1 Attachment(s)
Once again, Wales is let down by Labour
A debate comes around for further amendment to the wales bill, including devolution of policing and APD to Wales. Welsh Labour policy is for devolution of policing. Out of 25 Welsh MPs, 2 of them turn up. Pathetic and unacceptable. They continuously moan that brexit is going to give the tories more power, but when a vote comes around for them to take some of that power away from the tories (and give to Labour), they don't even show up. Even the SNP turned up ffs.
Thank **** we have Plaid standing up for us, its certain that no one else is.
Attachment 581
Re: Once again, Wales is let down by Labour
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tommy31
A debate comes around for further amendment to the wales bill, including devolution of policing and APD to Wales. Welsh Labour policy is for devolution of policing. Out of 25 Welsh MPs, 2 of them turn up. Pathetic and unacceptable. They continuously moan that brexit is going to give the tories more power, but when a vote comes around for them to take some of that power away from the tories (and give to Labour), they don't even show up. Even the SNP turned up ffs.
Thank **** we have Plaid standing up for us, its certain that no one else is.
Attachment 581
Flynn plus a woman, I'll be asking my MP Stephen Doughty why he couldn't be arsed turning up
Re: Once again, Wales is let down by Labour
The Brexit vote and the peoples blinkered decision, will hang over this country forevermore .
Re: Once again, Wales is let down by Labour
Just to show, this is what was being voted on:
Clause 44 extends the Secretary of State’s power to block an Act of the
Assembly to include the grounds that a provision might have a serious
adverse impact on sewerage services or systems in England. At present,
section 114 of the 2006 Act allows the Secretary of State to make an
order prohibiting the Clerk of the Assembly from submitting a Bill for
Royal Assent. This can be done if s/he believes that it would have an
adverse effect on a reserved matter, on water resources, supply or
quality in England, or on the operation of the law in England, or if it is
incompatible with international obligations, defence or national security.
If anyone can read that and come to any other conclusion other than 'colony', please enlighten me.
