No wingers please

Printable View

29-07-20, 13:09
WJ99mobile

No wingers please

Fulham did a job on us in my opinion not allowing us to play in the channels

Hoilett is knackered
NML can't play when they cover the kick and chase
Murphy loses possession when not given space and they don't need to come out so there's going to be no space in behind

4-3-3

Ralls Vaulks Bacuna in the middle

Ward Glatezel Pato

Bring Tomlin on at HT
29-07-20, 13:22
delmbox

Re: No wingers please

Tomlin has to start if we're chasing two goals, especially in that team. Ward and Glatzel upfront, Tomlin behind
29-07-20, 13:37
Rjk

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by WJ99mobile

Fulham did a job on us in my opinion not allowing us to play in the channels

Hoilett is knackered
NML can't play when they cover the kick and chase
Murphy loses possession when not given space and they don't need to come out so there's going to be no space in behind

4-3-3

Ralls Vaulks Bacuna in the middle

Ward Glatezel Pato

Bring Tomlin on at HT

Their fullbacks were excellent last time and our wingers barely got a sniff, so I was thinking the same, but instead:

4-3-1-2 with tomlin behind pato and glatzel
29-07-20, 13:41
delmbox

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rjk

Their fullbacks were excellent last time and our wingers barely got a sniff, so I was thinking the same, but instead:

4-3-1-2 with tomlin behind pato and glatzel

Ward's our best finisher though
29-07-20, 13:42
NYCBlue

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by WJ99mobile

Fulham did a job on us in my opinion not allowing us to play in the channels

Hoilett is knackered
NML can't play when they cover the kick and chase
Murphy loses possession when not given space and they don't need to come out so there's going to be no space in behind

4-3-3

Ralls Vaulks Bacuna in the middle

Ward Glatezel Pato

Bring Tomlin on at HT

That team would have no shots on goal in the first half. The only way we could get the ball forward is by booting it out of defence. Whatever their limitations NML and Hoilett are our best options of getting the ball forward.
29-07-20, 13:42
Eric the Half a Bee

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by delmbox

Ward's our best finisher though

Keep him for the last 20 minutes
29-07-20, 13:53
dembethewarrior

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by delmbox

Ward's our best finisher though

Yeah but Pato is a nuisance see, so that will work.
29-07-20, 14:22
The Hooded Claw

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by dembethewarrior

Yeah but Pato is a nuisance see, so that will work.

Oh, the famous Plan A...
29-07-20, 14:35
delmbox

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee

Keep him for the last 20 minutes

I disagree Eric, we have to score first, by the last 20 mins we'll be 160 minutes into this tie and it could be well past over
29-07-20, 14:55
City123

Re: No wingers please

Smithies

Bacuna Morrison Nelson Bennett

Vaulks

Paterson Flint Glatzel Bamba Ward

6-0 win, easy. :thumbup:
29-07-20, 16:16
dembethewarrior

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Hooded Claw

Oh, the famous Plan A...

Went quiet once it obviously failed didn't he :hehe:
29-07-20, 16:30
splott parker

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by delmbox

I disagree Eric, we have to score first, by the last 20 mins we'll be 160 minutes into this tie and it could be well past over

True the whistle to start the game is the half time whistle in effect and we’re two down.
29-07-20, 16:30
splott parker

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by splott parker

True the whistle to start the game is the half time whistle in effect and we’re two down.

The whistle to start the second half I meant
29-07-20, 16:31
dembethewarrior

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by splott parker

True the whistle to start the game is the half time whistle in effect and we’re two down.

You've had a BLUETIT there.
30-07-20, 10:36
BLUETIT

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by dembethewarrior

Went quiet once it obviously failed didn't he :hehe:

Nope, still here, and plans B, C, and D, did us proud, didn't they.

Remind me, how many has Glatzel scored, when starting. ?
30-07-20, 10:44
Rjk

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLUETIT

Nope, still here, and plans B, C, and D, did us proud, didn't they.

Remind me, how many has Glatzel scored, when starting. ?

4 in the league when starting, 3 when coming on as a sub.

Paterson has 4 in the league as a starter and 1 as a sub.

both played a very similar number of minutes
30-07-20, 10:57
BlueArmy 86

Re: No wingers please

I want Bacuna back in the middle, where he has been most effective, and give Sanderson the chance to make amends for his last Craven Cottage howler. I think he got the right attitude to put it right.

I would still start NML and Junior. It was one bad game.
30-07-20, 10:59
BLUETIT

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rjk

4 in the league when starting, 3 when coming on as a sub

Paterson has 4 in the league as a starter and 1 as a sub.

both played a very similar number of minutes

One a pelanty, at Derby, when were the other 3, I take it before lockdown ?
30-07-20, 14:19
dembethewarrior

Re: No wingers please

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLUETIT

Nope, still here, and plans B, C, and D, did us proud, didn't they.

Remind me, how many has Glatzel scored, when starting. ?

We look a better more fluid team with him up top. He's growing and getting used to the league. He's an actual striker, and has a head, unlike the other headless one that runs about doing what? Nobody knows.