Rachel Reeves says she wants 'Spades in the ground' for most of the projects mentioned in her speech today
But ...
Wouldn't Industrial excavators diggers and Bulldozers be much quicker......???
Printable View
Rachel Reeves says she wants 'Spades in the ground' for most of the projects mentioned in her speech today
But ...
Wouldn't Industrial excavators diggers and Bulldozers be much quicker......???
Was hoping she uttered the words, Drill baby Drill 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😁😁.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elwood Blues
Maybe she's old order Amish.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elwood Blues
Good thinking Elwood, and they will need those spades in the ground for the new euthanasia law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elwood Blues
You seen those fellas putting up barns? They would get us moving.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
https://youtube.com/shorts/vxbwl0dpp...tM1SlGq2-KGcfa
what were you hoping she would drill exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathblue
I've no fracking idea, but oil be back if I can think of anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
Thanks Derrick:thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Tell you one thing. The economy will have to Trump environmental concerns if she wants to speed up development, as that is by far the biggest blocker, with a case in point below.
And that's not to say we shouldn't have environmental concerns because we absolutely should, but it's hard to do both.
The silly tossers brought it upon themselves with talk of "climate emergencies", which true or not does imply a complete halt on developments.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3e1pw7npklo
The European countries are in a race to see who can get back to the stone age first, while the rest of the world is cracking on.Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesWales
Isn't that basically what the chancellor has said? that growth will trump anything else. Didn't think you were a fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesWales
Which silly tossers?Quote:
The silly tossers brought it upon themselves with talk of "climate emergencies", which true or not does imply a complete halt on developments.
What have they brought on themselves?
It is what she's said. I don't disagree with her. I'm just saying it's far easier said than done and will be made far more difficult politically and legislatively by environmental commitments, which as I say, is at least in part understandable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
I mean stuff like this. In an emergency, you do nothing more than exit the building / put out the fire etc. You certainly don't build anything on green spaces.
It was a stupid term to use really (by most parties)
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ction-campaign