Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Printable View

18-03-25, 09:37
BLUETIT

Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Without VAR, when was the last time you seen a referee change his mind ?

I can’t remember one !
18-03-25, 09:48
North Cardiff Blue

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

No I can't but good job he did as he was definitely wrong to award it in the first place.
18-03-25, 09:54
the other bob wilson

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLUETIT

Without VAR, when was the last time you seen a referee change his mind ?

I can’t remember one !

Didn't Warnock get annoyed with Mike Dean at Burnley in our last season in the Premier League? Can't remember the exact details now, but I think he may have awarded us a penalty and then changed his mind.
18-03-25, 10:01
Rjk

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by the other bob wilson

Didn't Warnock get annoyed with Mike Dean at Burnley in our last season in the Premier League? Can't remember the exact details now, but I think he may have awarded us a penalty and then changed his mind.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/47836291
18-03-25, 10:09
The Lone Gunman

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Here's another from the same season - Huddersfield were awarded a penalty at the CCS, but the decision was then overturned. Warnock was happy with that one.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46766859
18-03-25, 10:47
Steve the Tea

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by the other bob wilson

Didn't Warnock get annoyed with Mike Dean at Burnley in our last season in the Premier League? Can't remember the exact details now, but I think he may have awarded us a penalty and then changed his mind.

Mike Dean's handling of that game left a taste in the mouth. As far as I can reflect there were four penalty-incidents for City that Dean ignored plus the incident mentioned in the article.

I also remember that one of Burnley's goals was allowed to stand by Dean despite a Burnley player being no more than a yard in front of the City goalkeeper and in his line of sight.

StT.
<><
18-03-25, 11:19
Undercoverinwurzelland

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve the Tea

Mike Dean's handling of that game left a taste in the mouth. As far as I can reflect there were four penalty-incidents for City that Dean ignored plus the incident mentioned in the article.

I also remember that one of Burnley's goals was allowed to stand by Dean despite a Burnley player being no more than a yard in front of the City goalkeeper and in his line of sight.

StT.
<><

Just a couple of weeks after the Chelsea incident too. How our history might have been different with a couple of different refereeing decisions.
18-03-25, 11:32
insider

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Last season away to Blackburn the ref gave us a goal then consulted with the lino and chalked it off
18-03-25, 11:39
Pedro de la Rosa

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by the other bob wilson

Didn't Warnock get annoyed with Mike Dean at Burnley in our last season in the Premier League? Can't remember the exact details now, but I think he may have awarded us a penalty and then changed his mind.

Yes, and that was a stonewaller. Camarasa had the ball on the spot and was ready to take it, it was bizarre.
18-03-25, 12:06
Dave Blue

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

I haven’t seen a clip of Saturday’s none penalty from any of the highlights I’ve seen. Can anyone drop it in here thanks?
18-03-25, 12:22
BLUETIT

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Blue

I haven’t seen a clip of Saturday’s none penalty from any of the highlights I’ve seen. Can anyone drop it in here thanks?

Last post in this Fred

https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...71#post5578971
18-03-25, 12:22
NinianKnight

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

I have some memory of a penalty being overturned at Ninian Park around 2006? I can't remember the opposition, but the penalty was cancelled because the linesman indicated a foul by the opposition in their half in the buildup to the incident where the penalty was awarded.
18-03-25, 14:52
Steve the Tea

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undercoverinwurzelland

Just a couple of weeks after the Chelsea incident too. How our history might have been different with a couple of different refereeing decisions.

Yes, very true, UCiW.

Yet, we are told that the game is as honest as the day is long. Yeah? Only the gullible can hold unswervingly to that, methinks these days. Yes, City may get the occasional decision ... thankfully the lino knew the Laws of the Game better than the man with the whistle at Blackburn last Saturday but the integrity of the game has never been lower. The introduction of VAR and the incessant meddling with the Laws have opened up a can of worms.

StT.
<><
18-03-25, 14:58
Steve the Tea

Re: Blackburn’s non-pelanty ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by NinianKnight

I have some memory of a penalty being overturned at Ninian Park around 2006? I can't remember the opposition, but the penalty was cancelled because the linesman indicated a foul by the opposition in their half in the buildup to the incident where the penalty was awarded.

I think there was one involving James Maddison in the PL. I believe the referee was Lee Mason who ruled a dive as Maddison tried to get a penalty. The lino got involved but Mason stuck to his original decision.

StT.
<><