-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
OK Here goes.
So there we have it, he is linked to a group of conspiracy theorists.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:48
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
OK Here goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
There is no evidence either way of the actual plane.
Hence where the logic comes in. http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/thumbup.gif
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:50
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:48
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
OK Here goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
There is no evidence either way of the actual plane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
So I'm left with believing a couple of copy ad pasters on speed on a football messageboard, who have continually in this thread got details of the aviation industry wrong.
Thus, now stay with me on this TrueBlue, his "conspiracy theory" is no different, better or worse than any other "conspiracy theory," as none of them are substantiated by irrefutable evidence of any kind.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
The plane landed on Diego Garcia. Immarsat confirmed it flew in that direction and there was a ton of evidence suggesting the plane landed on that island before Immarsat investigated and gave their opinion.
If anyone still thinks it crashed into the sea, explain how the Air Asia plane was found within a few days but MH370 still hasn't been found?
I can talk all night about this, but I will leave it there as I will be a "crackpot conspiracy theorist" to the majority of you who refuse to open your mind about what really goes on in the world.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:50
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:48
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
OK Here goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
There is no evidence either way of the actual plane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
So I'm left with believing a couple of copy ad pasters on speed on a football messageboard, who have continually in this thread got details of the aviation industry wrong.
Have you got anything 'logical' to say, or is that post count a little hobby you collect?
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonteg Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:58
The plane landed on Diego Garcia. Immarsat confirmed it flew in that direction and there was a ton of evidence suggesting the plane landed on that island before Immarsat investigated and gave their opinion.
It was seen by a New Zealand oil worker working on a rig some distance from Diego Garcia, heading in that direction and flying quite low.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:57
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:50
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:48
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
OK Here goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
There is no evidence either way of the actual plane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
So I'm left with believing a couple of copy ad pasters on speed on a football messageboard, who have continually in this thread got details of the aviation industry wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
Or the other option is to listen to a professional in the industry give me his suspicions along with that of many of his professional colleagues.
Except, now stay with me on this Sheepie. His conspiracy theory is based on his training, his experience and his knowledge, along with that of many of his colleagues, not from a few cash generating websites, added to that his version of events is entirely feasible and doesn't require the tight lippedness of thousands of people.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:01
The plane landed on Diego Garcia. Immarsat confirmed it flew in that direction and there was a ton of evidence suggesting the plane landed on that island before Immarsat investigated and gave their opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonteg Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:58
If anyone still thinks it crashed into the sea, explain how the Air Asia plane was found within a few days but MH370 still hasn't been found?
It was also seen by several people in the Maldives flying towards Diego Garcia: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/malaysia/1070 6853/MH370-Maldives-Islanders-claim-to-have-spotted-low-flyi ng-jet.html
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:05
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:57
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:50
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:48
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
OK Here goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
There is no evidence either way of the actual plane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
So I'm left with believing a couple of copy ad pasters on speed on a football messageboard, who have continually in this thread got details of the aviation industry wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
Or the other option is to listen to a professional in the industry give me his suspicions along with that of many of his professional colleagues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
Which seems more logical to you?
So in short, a "feasible" conspiracy theory? But a conspiracy theory nevertheless.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonteg Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:07
The plane landed on Diego Garcia. Immarsat confirmed it flew in that direction and there was a ton of evidence suggesting the plane landed on that island before Immarsat investigated and gave their opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:01
If anyone still thinks it crashed into the sea, explain how the Air Asia plane was found within a few days but MH370 still hasn't been found?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonteg Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:58
I can talk all night about this, but I will leave it there as I will be a "crackpot conspiracy theorist" to the majority of you who refuse to open your mind about what really goes on in the world.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584123/Revealed-Mal aysian-Airlines-pilot-high-security-US-base-Diego-Garcia-pro grammed-homemade-flight-simulator-deleted-data-just-taking-c ontrol-missing-plane.html
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonteg Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:58
The plane landed on Diego Garcia. Immarsat confirmed it flew in that direction and there was a ton of evidence suggesting the plane landed on that island before Immarsat investigated and gave their opinion.
Sorry to piss on your chips.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:11
If you are as ignorant as me why are you telling everyone else they are wrong? If I say 'possibly' the plane didn't crash I would get a load of crap for it but if you do it it's fine, I know people who have had depression and suicidal tendencies, thoughts of what happens after their death do not come in to it a lot of the time, I'm sure many wouldn't go through with it if they thought about the affect it would have on their families ect, that is why I can't see any logic in why this guy would care if any evidence was left behind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:05
Put it this way, it's more likely the pilot wouldn't have wanted to have be seen as a suicide rather than the plane being flown through a shedload of international airspace to a secret location with all the people killed so they could setup Russia for shooting down a different place with a different load of people on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:57
If the pilot didn't want to be seen as a suicide why didn't he crash it to the sea so it looked like a crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:50
Who said he didn't crash into the sea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:48
Sky High Bluebird: The lack of any debris from the aircraft suggests that the it was deliberately landed on the water like the Hudson river Airbus a320 but then sank to the bottom of the ocean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:38
Oh, I get you. I was taking that as crashing it into the sea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:30
It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? This is a description of what he thinks is the most plausible explanation, I was hoping your usual logic could explain it a bit better for me.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:21
OK Here goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:16
There is no evidence either way of the actual plane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:07
So I'm left with believing a couple of copy ad pasters on speed on a football messageboard, who have continually in this thread got details of the aviation industry wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:56
Or the other option is to listen to a professional in the industry give me his suspicions along with that of many of his professional colleagues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:46
Which seems more logical to you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 21:20
Lets do this slowly for you:
Either way it's an educated theory and not a made up one for advertising money like your ones. http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/thumbup.gif
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
So Thats 4500 people all with satellite tv etc, and not one of them ringing CNN etc or going on the Internet to tell various media outlets ,,,,,,oi !! that big **** off jet that you reckon has crashed is parked on the airfield up the road.
You think the passengers might want to ring people to tell them "it's ok we've landed on an island" but it's all a big secret. Shhhhhhhhhh !!
that's bat shit mental on a grand scale.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before. http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
Please tell me you can see the link between the two?
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:25
Advertising money? Oooh that's a new tactic.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
I don't use AdBlock. I work with adverts and websites for a living. I know the sorts of revenues a high traffic website can expect to earn from well placed adverts.
So you will know that all web sites will try and get the best advertising on their sites, that has nothing to do with this topic.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky High Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:11
The plane landed on Diego Garcia. Immarsat confirmed it flew in that direction and there was a ton of evidence suggesting the plane landed on that island before Immarsat investigated and gave their opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonteg Bluebird wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 22:58
If anyone still thinks it crashed into the sea, explain how the Air Asia plane was found within a few days but MH370 still hasn't been found?
Whatever you think, everything points towards Diego Garcia and the activity on that island shortly after MH370's disappearance is VERY unusual and suspicious.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:29
Advertising money? Oooh that's a new tactic.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:25
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
I don't use AdBlock. I work with adverts and websites for a living. I know the sorts of revenues a high traffic website can expect to earn from well placed adverts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
Please tell me you can see the link between the two?
Uh? The adverts earn the webmasters the money, the money is what they want, but they need visitors to get that money. Hence making up stories which then get linked all over the internet. http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/thumbup.gif
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:35
Advertising money? Oooh that's a new tactic.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:29
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:25
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
I don't use AdBlock. I work with adverts and websites for a living. I know the sorts of revenues a high traffic website can expect to earn from well placed adverts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
Please tell me you can see the link between the two?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
So you will know that all web sites will try and get the best advertising on their sites, that has nothing to do with this topic.
Well you can same the same about any web sites if that's the case, anyway, lets get back to this: It was also suggested that he did this so as to leave no evidence, evidence of what exactly? any ideas?
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:39
Advertising money? Oooh that's a new tactic.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:35
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:29
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:25
I don't use AdBlock. I work with adverts and websites for a living. I know the sorts of revenues a high traffic website can expect to earn from well placed adverts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
Please tell me you can see the link between the two?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
So you will know that all web sites will try and get the best advertising on their sites, that has nothing to do with this topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
Anyway, I assume you are getting at the skillset of the passengers on the flight or the cargo.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by clearly offside wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 18:20
My question was to offside who dismissed any involvement from politicians and said it was the 'alphabet agencies'. That is why I use them. As it happens, I would agree with you that as these things are political then politicians would be invovled.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 10:45
I'm repeating the question because it hasn't become close to being answered. But the question was for offside as it was about thoughts that have come from his posts so you can ignore!
Thanks for replying to this. How about responding to the other questions you've ignored, despite me posting a few times? On page 3 of thread, I will repost if you need.
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:35
Advertising money? Oooh that's a new tactic.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:29
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:25
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
I don't use AdBlock. I work with adverts and websites for a living. I know the sorts of revenues a high traffic website can expect to earn from well placed adverts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
Please tell me you can see the link between the two?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
So you will know that all web sites will try and get the best advertising on their sites, that has nothing to do with this topic.
So your point is?
-
Re: One for the beam me up scotty Brigade. MH370
Quote:
Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:52
Advertising money? Oooh that's a new tactic.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:35
Yes, no one has ever mentioned about CT websites wanting clicks for their adverts before.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/Dsmile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:29
Turn your adblock off and see how many are on this site, what does that have to do with the price of fish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:25
I don't use AdBlock. I work with adverts and websites for a living. I know the sorts of revenues a high traffic website can expect to earn from well placed adverts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:22
Please tell me you can see the link between the two?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:20
So you will know that all web sites will try and get the best advertising on their sites, that has nothing to do with this topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R wrote on Wed, 11 March 2015 23:17
Finally the penny drops. Do you believe the nonsense you read on the Daily Mail? If not why do you believe on other websites that rely even moreso on advertising. http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/shrug.gif
