I believe that, under pressure of being on TV (she started off a little flustered), she used the wrong word. It is common.
Since you are not implying anything, can you tell me what you are actually stating?
Printable View
The stir is where the video's hosted. It has 1.8 million views and attracted 1,800 comments.
Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LP9O...ature=youtu.be
It looks like Morg has accepted one of those social media challenges. You know the type. "Thanks for the nomination I'm going to share one You Tube video per day for 10 consecutive days that best show my philosophical, social and political outlook. No Explanations, just pictures".
So, let's get this straight. You've posted a link to a video, but you weren't making any implications nor statements from posting the video. You simply said the video "caused a stir". That is based on it getting 1.8m views and 1800 comments, none of which you have read.
Is it possible, then, that you were throwing in a strawman because your previous argument was getting ripped apart. You've tried it in this post too.
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php...=1#post5070381
This was his last one, just a week or so ago. It carries on, on the next page.
He never explains why he thinks the things he shares are important and says that the things themselves are what is important. Making no f**king sense whatsoever.