You seem to be taking this new information as fact - yet you have literally questioned every part of the news about Cummings. Why is that?
Printable View
Partly because the man who lied admitted himself and none of the others have denied their actions. It's really a case of one being as bad as another, and the amount of spin that the media puts on everything.
I think Cummins was wrong whatever is said, but things like this just don't breed confidence do they?
That isn't trolling. That is pointing out your lack of consistency and is, therefore, relevant to the point you are making. You claim you read something, but you have also claimed you don't read these things. It's important, to the casual reader, to point this out.
"The retired teacher saw Cummins in Barnard Castle whilst he was'isolating' in Durham" - where in Durham was he "isolating" that makes this is an issue?
When did he pick his daughter up from Berkshire? Was it before or after CummingsGate and the easing of lockdown in England?
Asking for a friend.
Latest on the Oxford vaccine
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-h...virus-vaccine/
Arguably, this response is trolling. But, I take your lack of words as a lack of an argument. I'll let the casual reader decide on how much weight they'd want to put on your observations which, to put it mildly, seem to be based on you actually reading a newspaper (real or online) and getting a story that confirms your own bias.
apparently it was either just before or just after the ban on driving distances was relaxed but form what I saw he wasn't sure, and he definitely contacted and traveled with a person who was isolating at another place and took them into his family which risked possibly infecting either his family or the people in the house he went to to collect her, which despite when he did it was still contrary to the lockdown requirements. So basically he took the risk of contaminating the people in the house in Berkshire or of his daughter contaminating his family in Durham.
As I have now said 3 times, it doesn't make what Cummins did right but it makes you doubt people when they say things, particularly when its held and altered by the media. That is the main point, that the media spin things so you cannot take anything on face value.
I know you struggle with facts, that is fine. I am just reminding any readers that you have an awful lot of opinions on something that you claim you don't even read.
Either you are a liar (in that you do read newspapers "real or online")
Or, you have an anti-media agenda and are cherry-picking examples to back up your anti-media sentiments and biases.
I can't really see it being anything other than those two things at present.
Type :wave: if you are unable to refute the above
Type an answer if you are able to refute the above.
I'm asking you these questions because you are taking the medias word for it on how they're reporting the "facts" yet questioned everything else preceding the news today.
You have said yourself that the gentleman in question "saw Cummins in Barnard Castle whilst he was'isolating' in Durham" - I want to know how you know he was isolating in Durham as if you're going to keep saying that the media twist everything, then surely you can see that this could be twisted? Does he even live in Durham?