-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Fox News = Fake News! It has come to something when the only news source we can trust is Donald Trump's twitter feed!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
Fox News = Fake News! It has come to something when the only news source we can trust is Donald Trump's twitter feed!
Judicial Watch have been very busy with their FOIA requests, not that you would have noticed or even wanted to have noticed. We all know how leftism works by pretending not to know stuff, but unfortunately you cannot avoid the truth forever.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
That's not very nice, Mr Q :frown:
I don't get angry about anything on here (unless I get called a rapist apologist). I'm easily amused by everything else posted on the politics board by your "squad"*
*including the posts I can see when Gluey is quoted.
I'm genuinely not sure what's wrong with you though, to be completely honest. You're obviously more intelligent than the other two and you can sometimes come across as reasonable... but then you can turn the dial to '100% Tinfoiler' and nobody can take you seriously. It's a shame, really.
H+/-Q=?
Moral Narcissist alert
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Yes FISA needs looking at , who initially directed it to spy on USA citizens ???
Spy on foreign nationals yes , but your own , 4th admendemnt ??? , mmmmm ??
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
Fox News = Fake News! It has come to something when the only news source we can trust is Donald Trump's twitter feed!
It's not about trust there talking about reform of dodgy FISA warrants , though one would support reforms of being able to not spying upon ones own people ,wasn't Labour shouting strongly about this stuff in the UK , and peoples rights to not have communication intrusion??
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nelsonca61
Day 3 will be easy, we finish at 13.00 😂
Good biblical target is 1pm on day 3 as its an acceptable time to start supping copious amounts of booze and packets of Pork Scratchings , my local vicar told me .
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
It's not about trust there talking about reform of dodgy FISA warrants , though one would support reforms of being able to not spying upon ones own people ,wasn't Labour shouting strongly about this stuff in the UK , and peoples rights to not have communication intrusion??
I'd love to see the smirk on his face as he scrolls through his favourite media outlets, thinking to himself how clever he is, totally oblivious of the large elephant sitting in his room :biggrin:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Moral Narcissist alert
:hehe: I'd love for you to explain what that means in relation to my post.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
Is this your own self-imposed fasting regime - or is there some tradition of not eating during working hours (even if you finish at 1.00 pm)? I have known a lot of people who have decided to fast or restrict what they ate for a period (sometimes something like 2 days a week) - usually for weight loss or health reasons - but never a working hours 'Lent' fast. Is it a religious thing, or just using Lent as a hook to hang something else on? Intrigued.
Just a spur of the moment decision whilst munching pancakes on shrove Tuesday, christened catholic but hate Religion, don't eat fish on good Friday as well, also a personal challenge to myself, I worked with a Muslim colleague for 7 years and watched for him 7 years be faithful to Ramadan each year and thinking WTF how stupid, I bumped into him last week and in our chat Ramadan/Lent came up so I just thought Fcuk/it lets have a go, but for me its easy, I can take fluid in the day and its only 4 days a week, I would like to think I can lose a couple of lbs. to boot in preparation my holiday, but as that starts in Italy, I'm starting to have doubts if it will go ahead the way the fear porn brigade (MSM) are pushing it at the moment.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nelsonca61
Just a spur of the moment decision whilst munching pancakes on shrove Tuesday, christened catholic but hate Religion, don't eat fish on good Friday as well, also a personal challenge to myself, I worked with a Muslim colleague for 7 years and watched for him 7 years be faithful to Ramadan each year and thinking WTF how stupid, I bumped into him last week and in our chat Ramadan/Lent came up so I just thought Fcuk/it lets have a go, but for me its easy, I can take fluid in the day and its only 4 days a week, I would like to think I can lose a couple of lbs. to boot in preparation my holiday, but as that starts in Italy, I'm starting to have doubts if it will go ahead the way the fear porn brigade (MSM) are pushing it at the moment.
:thumbup:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I'd love to see the smirk on his face as he scrolls through his favourite media outlets, thinking to himself how clever he is, totally oblivious of the large elephant sitting in his room :biggrin:
Nellie I suppose? Trust you to bring the subject back to Trump. This is fanboy devotion gone mad! :biggrin: :biggrin:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
Nellie I suppose? Trust you to bring the subject back to Trump. This is fanboy devotion gone mad! :biggrin: :biggrin:
It's nothing to do with Trump, in case you haven't realised the gatekeepers only let the chosen candidates through, and it didn't just start in 2016 America. You and your ilk are the enablers that allow it to happen, the useful idiots of the world.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
It's nothing to do with Trump, in case you haven't realised the gatekeepers only let the chosen candidates through, and it didn't just start in 2016 America. You and your ilk are the enablers that allow it to happen, the useful idiots of the world.
You'll see this as heresy I'm sure, but I've just watched an American public service documentary series on Bill Clinton which was far from just a tribute to him and it struck me that the way he was treated by the Republicans compares very closely to how the Democrats have been with Trump. Was that also an attempted coup against an elected President or do different rules apply because Clinton is a, despised, globalist?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
It's nothing to do with Trump, in case you haven't realised the gatekeepers only let the chosen candidates through, and it didn't just start in 2016 America. You and your ilk are the enablers that allow it to happen, the useful idiots of the world.
So you are saying that Trump was the chosen candidate of the 'gatekeepers' when he won the Republican nomination and then the electoral college vote?
That seems to contradict everything you (and your ilk) have been spouting for the past 4 years.
And my previous post on this wasn't about Trump - it was about trump, trump, trump. :biggrin:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
So you are saying that Trump was the chosen candidate of the 'gatekeepers' when he won the Republican nomination and then the electoral college vote?
That seems to contradict everything you (and your ilk) have been spouting for the past 4 years.
And my previous post on this wasn't about Trump - it was about trump, trump, trump. :biggrin:
Read up on operation crossfire hurricane and get back to me..
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Good news for those who believe in the rule of law as Rep Radcliffe reappears..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qRBMMxcugM
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
So you are saying that Trump was the chosen candidate of the 'gatekeepers' when he won the Republican nomination and then the electoral college vote?
That seems to contradict everything you (and your ilk) have been spouting for the past 4 years.
And my previous post on this wasn't about Trump - it was about trump, trump, trump. :biggrin:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Read up on operation crossfire hurricane and get back to me..
It is alright for you to admit you have tied yourself in a knot again. You said above: '....in case you haven't realised the gatekeepers only let the chosen candidates through, and it didn't just start in 2016 America.' I asked you if that meant that Trump was the chosen candidate of these gatekeepers - as he was nominated and elected. He clearly got through.
I have read way too much on Operation Crossfire Hurricane already and have no intention of getting back to you on it.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
I have read way too much on Operation Crossfire Hurricane already and have no intention of getting back to you on it.
Obviously, as it exposes you as being a shill of the fake news media :wink:
PS Trump wasn't supposed to make it, but the incompetence of those trying to stop him was unprecedented.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
President Trump negotiates an end to the 18-year Afghan war
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-51689443
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Hell's bells, the Don has called another coronavirus press conference for later on. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...99741630230530
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
I will be having a 1:30 P.M. Press Conference at the White House to discuss the latest CoronaVirus developments. Thank you!
5:02 PM · Feb 29, 2020
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
Hell's bells, the Don has called another coronavirus press conference for later on.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...99741630230530
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
I will be having a 1:30 P.M. Press Conference at the White House to discuss the latest CoronaVirus developments. Thank you!
5:02 PM · Feb 29, 2020
I expect he's found a cure.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
Hell's bells, the Don has called another coronavirus press conference for later on.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...99741630230530
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
I will be having a 1:30 P.M. Press Conference at the White House to discuss the latest CoronaVirus developments. Thank you!
5:02 PM · Feb 29, 2020
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thank you Mr. President for keeping America safe and being on top of the coronavirus.</p>— RD (@real_defender) <a href="https://twitter.com/real_defender/status/1233800465059647491?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
I didn't dream it, he appointed Pence as the virus tsar just days back, now he's going to front a presser on a Saturday afternoon.
Can watch it here live https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jv8v...ature=youtu.be it's scheduled to start in 10 mins.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Although it was an uninspiring performance, he did at least manage to drag his sorry arse to the prior press conference to the time that he appointed.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
WTF is he rambling on about? He's either been at the Mogadon tablets or hasn't slept for days.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
He essentially said nothing when reading a script while looking tired and depressed.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
He essentially said nothing when reading a script while looking tired and depressed.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A POS “reporter” tried to have a gotcha moment by asking <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTr ump</a> “Why have you been muzzling Doctor Fauci?<br><br>I dont think she realized Dr Fauci was right there<br><br>"I’ve never been muzzled and I’ve been doing this since Reagan." Dr Fauci responded.”<a href="https://t.co/jEBtJsbBBs">pic.twitter.com/jEBtJsbBBs</a></p>— Femme Fatale (@RealBasedMAGA) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealBasedMAGA/status/1233844635161780225?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Are they CGIing the fanny out of trump's neck, now?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/1Awkh7BRsi">pic.twitter.com/1Awkh7BRsi</a></p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1231715794217623552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
You'll see this as heresy I'm sure, but I've just watched an American public service documentary series on Bill Clinton which was far from just a tribute to him and it struck me that the way he was treated by the Republicans compares very closely to how the Democrats have been with Trump. Was that also an attempted coup against an elected President or do different rules apply because Clinton is a, despised, globalist?
in your own time Gluey.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
in your own time Gluey.
We're the CIA, FBI, DOJ and foreign intel agencies also involved?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
We're the CIA, FBI, DOJ and foreign intel agencies also involved?
Nothing to do with the question I asked you, but, even if it were, the situation remains that the fate of both men was in the hands of a group of people with the power to remove an elected leader from his job and, in Clinton's case, the vote went entirely along party lines and, in Trump's, it went almost entirely along party lines. As both men had enough members of their own party involved in the vote to ensure that the required two thirds majority did not happen, they were always going to survive because of the deeply biased nature of those doing the voting - Clinton and Trump would have been removed from office if the Republicans in Clinton's case and Democrats in Trump's had over 66 per cent of those eligible to vote.
Yet, you constantly tell us that there was an attempted coup to remove Trump, the legally elected President (despite him losing the popular vote by a far bigger margin than the one which decided the Brexit referendum), so why won't you say the same about Clinton's impeachment?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Nothing to do with the question I asked you, but, even if it were, the situation remains that the fate of both men was in the hands of a group of people with the power to remove an elected leader from his job and, in Clinton's case, the vote went entirely along party lines and, in Trump's, it went almost entirely along party lines. As both men had enough members of their own party involved in the vote to ensure that the required two thirds majority did not happen, they were always going to survive because of the deeply biased nature of those doing the voting - Clinton and Trump would have been removed from office if the Republicans in Clinton's case and Democrats in Trump's had over 66 per cent of those eligible to vote.
Yet, you constantly tell us that there was an attempted coup to remove Trump, the legally elected President (despite him losing the popular vote by a far bigger margin than the one which decided the Brexit referendum), so why won't you say the same about Clinton's impeachment?
Clinton actually did what he was accused of doing.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Clinton actually did what he was accused of doing.
Trump admitted to the thing he was accused of as well, so, once again, I ask why is one an "attempted coup" and not the other one?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Trump admitted to the thing he was accused of as well, so, once again, I ask why is one an "attempted coup" and not the other one?
He was well within his rights to ask the Ukrainian president to investigate corruption as there is an anti-corruption agreement between both countries, which incidentally is now underway in Ukraine.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
He was well within his rights to ask the Ukrainian president to investigate corruption as there is an anti-corruption agreement between both countries, which incidentally is now underway in Ukraine.
Yeah, of course he was. Oh well, I tried, but I knew all along I would not get a straight answer from you - no one ever does
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Yeah, of course he was. Oh well, I tried, but I knew all along I would not get a straight answer from you - no one ever does
Facts are facts, even if you don't want them to be facts. Ukraine are now officially investigating Burisma Holdings whether you like it or not. How much straighter do you want my answer to be?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
I expect he's found a cure.
Israel has
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Israel has
No.
No they haven't.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Facts are facts, even if you don't want them to be facts. Ukraine are now officially investigating Burisma Holdings whether you like it or not. How much straighter do you want my answer to be?
So, this is an anti corruption deal whereby the American President is required to withhold Congress approved military aid payments to Ukraine as a part of the procedure and demand that one of his political opponents' sons be investigated by them before said investigation can take place is it? I see, but the thought does strike me that it's all a complicated for a deal whereby two countries are co-operating isn't it? I find your use of the word "now" in your last messages interesting.