You do have to give it to the government the way they've procured and rolled out the vaccine has been incredible.
You only have to look at the EU to see how it can be done slowly and poorly.
Printable View
So you now think 80000 of the 100000 deaths have been caused by the government's negligence. Where is your evidence for the 80000 deaths you now claim? I'm not defending the government; unlike some I have no attachment or link to any political Party; I'm just trying to clarify some of the outrageous statements made. What proof do I require you ask. You are the one that is making the claim and all I am asking for is your evidence that 80000 deaths have been caused by negligence. If you think making outrageous unverifiable claims amounts to holding the government to account I suggest you have failed as quoting meaningless facts is merely showing up the inadequacies of your argument. Just give up.
I don’t know why anyone bothers knocking the government, and I agree they have been shocking most of the time, even the eat out to help out probably started the second wave ffs....but this is Britain, whoever would have been in control would have no doubt faced the same issues as we’ve run the NHS down over the last 15 years....so many things done wrong like mentioned above, not least care homes and not closing borders last March.
You're right I was being a bit hyperbolous with the 100,000 and even the 80,000, a proportion of the deaths were unavoidable. I do believe a large majority of the deaths in this country should have been avoided but I'll admit there are some mitigating factors and we can't blame the government for every death.
Maybe if we had acted quickly, hadn't underfunded our health service for years and not made the same mistakes 3 times we wouldn't have one of the worst numbers for deaths in the world though.
I'm definitely not saying a labour government wouldn't have the same mistakes. That doesn't mean there shouldn't be an enquiry held into our response nor does it mean the government shouldn't be held accountable for what they've done. I'm also being genuine when I say previous tory governments wouldn't have botched it as bad as this one, it is genuinley the worst cabinet we've ever had by a distance.
The jobs for the boys and handing out billions to mates for track and trace etc is one of the biggest crimes going.
It may be right to say that Drakeford and Sturgeon having slightly different rules about 12 year old's was wrong when clearly singing from same hymn sheet, but in practice this is often a veiled attack on devolution. Arguably, the worst each nation has done is when they had joined up thinking at the start of first wave (moving ill or untested people back into care homes) and their joined up plans for winter (proposed 5 days travel relaxation) but the best each nation has done is when it's been prepared to act more individually and boldly: Boris using the summer to give business a boost, Sturgeon going hard and early when needed especially at the start of winter, Drakeford putting whole of Wales into lockdown during winter and the better promotion of ventilation as part of the key message, NI....I still don't know enough about what they've done.
They should have been more willing to work together but, with knowledge gained up to this point, more often than not that would have meant Boris conceding ground to Sturgeon which you know was never going to happen.
I think in respect of closing the borders the government were on a sticky wicket. close the borders and end up with none or significantly fewer cases and the public will complain of overkill. Keep the borders open and see what happens has allowed the virus to spread.
I read an article yesterday where a professor at some London Hospital had suggested that the NHS had been underfunded since the mid 70s, so this issue transcends the political spectrum
We'll have a public enquiry post pandemic, lessons will be learned, and one of them hopefully is we need to be a little but more appreciative of both public and private healthcare provision here in the UK. Its amongst the best in the world. Another lesson learned would be to delegate immediate executive authority to the chief medical officer so decisions are based solely on science and not political expediency.
What I would say is that, even factoring in variations in how these grisly statistics are compiled, for every person who has died in Germany of a covid-related cause, two people died in the UK. It too has a structure where health care responsibility is shared between the Federal government and the lander. The decisions made, the timing and nature of restrictions, the delivery structures used both by central and devolved governments and the overall competence of those with political responsibility for key decisions must have a part to play in this.
I don't agree with the idea that in an elected democracy, responsibility and accountability for key decisions and regulation should be taken out of the hands of the people the country voted to put in place and cede it to an appointed official, no matter how qualified.
Monti was (one of the very few) appointed to the senate and was not elected.
My point was that in times of national crisis, we need a mechanism whereby science trumps politics so decisions are based on contemporaneous medical thinking, and not how matters may look come the next election. whatever that mechanism is is up for debate.
Yep, it's also true of people in Outer China. Locals also wear face masks in the cities when pollution is bad.
Masks were one of the things I had in mind with the cultural difference. Also they are less likely to feel they have to rebel against government advice, unlike the western libertarians.
We do need to be careful when making international comparisons as the practices of recording deaths varies from country to country. An ONS report
http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati...uarytojune2020
confirmed this by stating:
"Given the widely differing practices between countries in recording and reporting deaths relating to COVID-19 it is not possible at this time to conduct accurate international comparisons of deaths involving COVID-19 specifically."
What we can say is that the situation in the UK is very bad and has not been handled well apart from the vaccine rollout which has been exemplary.
It would be funny to have a message board meet up after all this calms down, if only to put some usernames to faces:hehe: I’m sure we’d all get along just fine....with plenty of things to chat and laugh about. I owe Matt a few pints anyway for his Disney info service....
His “basic mistakes” were the fundamental reasons we found ourselves in the position we are.
The “big plus... the speed in which we procured vaccines...”
Bit like getting a shot of penicillin after you caught the fuucking clap.
For a lad who has avast experience of the medical industry, you have a skewed strategy in these things. I thought prevention was better than cure?
[QUOTE=Jordi Culé;5162621]His “basic mistakes” were the fundamental reasons we found ourselves in the position we are.
The “big plus... the speed in which we procured vaccines...”
Bit like getting a shot of penicillin after you caught the fuucking clap.
For a lad who has avast experience of the medical industry, you have a skewed strategy in these things. I thought prevention was better than cure?[/QUOTE]
I think you missed the point. The vaccine does prevent it.
“Basic mistakes...”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ummings-scheme