Printable View
There is a surprise. It is just what I think, as stated, it isn't a government view,Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
Although there was something yesterday that did say numbers in school were driven by the external virus level and were not a net contributor to external levels. In other words, schools and the children in them are more sinned against than sinning.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56072460
Don't tell everyone FFS!Quote:
Originally Posted by City123
I am I am. And I'm doing it again today.Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUETIT
But then I have 4 days off so rave while you have the chance!!
You have been warned!! I AM the law! :hehe:
I have been wondering what effect all the social distancing/mask wearing/hand sanitiser using, has had on the number of cases of flu. It turns out that it has indeed been dramatic:
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...rates-19737474
Cases down 95%!
Don't know how many are still checking this thread but, seeing as you're reading this post, you might be the sort of person interested in this talk from main Walesonline journalist following covid in Wales. Thursday 25th of Feb, 8.30-9:30am, free registration.Quote:
Join Will Hayward, Acting Political Editor for Media Wales, and hear about Will's perspective on how Covid-19 has awoken Wales' devolved consciousness. If you haven't registered already, you can do so here: buff.ly/3r0HTLh
https://twitter.com/CbsExec/status/1361586158610841601
In terms of vaccines, 19,342 adults in Wales (0.77%) have now been fully vaccinated - up 49% on yesterday.
(https://twitter.com/GillibrandPeter)
https://twitter.com/withorpe/status/...114519042?s=19
these just keep on coming
Absolutely criminal how this has become an acceptable thing to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
Surprised that Starmer and the national media dont pick up on thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
Honest question. do you spend you day surfing to find these things or d oyou have a person or organisation that sends them to you/ It is outrageous, i just wonder why it so often seesm to be you that finds them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
how do you know about the organisation?Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
What organisation? I was asking you. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
By the way, I meant its the information that is outrageous, not the fact that you post them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
someone or other I follow on twitter presumably retweeted it. there is definitely no shadowy organisation
On listening to Kim jong Drakeford just now, 3 more weeks staying home hopefully, maybe able to travel by Easter. I get that he’s being cautious etc and he’s on about not doing things wrong possibly like last July, but surely the fact that a third of adults/ those most vulnerable have been vaccinated makes a huge difference compared to last July when no one had? No doubt in another 6 weeks a fair few more would have been jabbed too? Looking at the data coming in from Israel where infection rates have plummeted with the vaccination, surely we can all hope for some good times ahead....
I never ever suggested there was a shadowy anything, spreading the info is perfectly legitimate. My reference to an organisation was just that you seem to be the poster who gets these first and I wondered if you got them from a political group or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
clearly it is not the labour party or others on here would also get them and post them, quite rightly.
I was just asking.
PS. I like the way you said 'the' organisation before you dismissed any such thing existed. :hehe::hehe:
65+ just contacted for drive-in jab next Weds at CCS. Might wear my football shirt.:hehe:
Johnson just cannot stop trying to run before he can walk it seems and why do his grand schemes always have to be given childish names?
https://www.theguardian.com/educatio...ols-in-england
Meanwhile, this under reported story would have, almost certainly, led to a ministerial resignation once, now hardly anyone seems bothered by it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56125462
Johnson is wielding too much power so he thinks he can do what he likes, either that or Hancock and Patel have something on him.
I listened to our first minister yesterday and he said there were more than 1800 patients in hospitals in Wales with Covid. Yet the figure the Wales Gov feed into the UK data says there were 1165.( as of 18th Feb). Seems a large difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by goats
Are you saying Mark Drakeford is lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by lisvaneblue
Never. Perhaps he was counting the people in out-patients and A and E. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Former Labour leader
He does make the odd mistake, I quite like that about him, he said he hoped all primary kids could be back by the 15th Feb, he clearly meant March but it can’t be too easy standing there relaying all this info....Quote:
Originally Posted by Former Labour leader
Why do you say it was under reported?Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
And the governemtn has said Whitty was no against the plan, and he has not publicly said he is, the reported disquiet is third hand. I'd ait to see what he says himself.
Im not surprised by the Guardian comments. The only thing that's consistent with that newspaper since it originated as the Manchester Guardian is that it reviles the ToriesQuote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Because it was under reported and is that really the only thing you find worthy of comment in that story about a Minister breaking the law? It’s touchingly naive of you to think that, with the job he’s got, Whitty would come out and make his disagreement with a Government formed by any party public.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Well, it evens up the balance a little bit from all of the papers who slavishly support the Conservatives no matter what while also reviling other parties.Quote:
Originally Posted by lisvaneblue
I wasn't commenting on the story though was I? I was asking why you say it was under reported. It was in the newspapers, where you saw it, and it was reported by BBC news. Do you mean it should have been over-reported?Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
I see no reason why Mr Whitty wouldn't say what he means, after all Van Tam did and despite all the comments about him probably being gagged he wasn't and he still come on TV and answers questions on the briefings.
It's just that it is reported as a fact but in reality its someone else saying Mr Whitty said something and the government saying he didn't. It's just another example of journalist and the press looking for negatives to report, and not just the Gardian but all of them. Why not wait until he actually says it himself?
I make the point again jusat so it's clear - - I was not commenting on the story!!
I think xsnaggle hasn't realised that you have posted two separate articles judging by his response.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Yes ssnaggle did. you really must stop fololwing me round you know, its not a good thing. If you read m responses instead of diving in to try and have a dig you will see I commented on them both or rather commented on one and remaked on TOBW's comments about the other. But you must have you little go. I mst really irritate you! :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Yet again people defending the indefensible. Just because you voted for someone it doesn’t mean you have to defend something they do and cry when they are held account.
It’s bad enough when people are biased about football teams. But when it’s about a political party it is pathetic.
Actually saying someone is “following you around a messageboard” is even more moronic than defending a political party being criminal just because you voted for them.
It is less moronic than the person who is doing it though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
As for defending a political party just because you voted for them, if you are referring to me defending anyone in these few posts I'd like you to show me where, and I'd also like to know how you know which way I voted in a secret ballot.
But I don't expect you to answer any of those points directly, you'll just make more spurious comments. :hehe:
Notice that I didn't reply to your post as you always moan about it. The only one of us who gets irritated is, very clearly, you.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
If you don't want to see my posts just put me on ignore and stop fecking wingeing.
And, by the way, there's no way that you were referring to two different stories :hehe:
I like erading your posts, they make me laugh, why would I put you on ignore? I'm not winging I think its quite flattering.Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
You are clearly reading what you want to read not what is there.
1. Why do you say it was under reported?........referring to TOBW's rearks about the second article.
2. And the governemnt has said Whitty was no against the plan, and he has not publicly said he is, the reported disquiet is third hand. I'd wait to see what he says himself........... referring to the first article.
Got that?
You don't find it "flattering" at all, you have got angry numerous times when I have replied to your posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
You called me a "stalker" the other day and had a right little rant.
Look, if I think you're wrong about something or if I disagree with something you've said, then I might reply to it. That's how a forum works.
It just so happens that you post a lot of shit that I disagree with or that I think you're wrong about, so I may reply to yours posts more than some others.
If you don't have the mentality to handle people disagreeing with you, then you're on the wrong messageboard.
I can't believe that this has to be explained to a grown man to be honest.
You talk a load of shit too. To honestly believe that I get 'angry' about anything you say or anyone says on here indicates you have far to high an opinion of yourself and your own view of things. It's a message board, it's not real, get over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
your use of things like 'don't have the mentality' is just laughable. I am actually chuckling to myself typing this, which isn't helping my normally shite typing.
But I do notice you have dropped the comments about me not referring to both articles. Not to worry, keep trying. Just remember this isn't real life, its a joke and a bit of fun around the football, that is all.
Sad!!
Of course I talk a lot of shit, the only difference is that I don't get upset and call other posters stalkers if they tell me that I'm talking shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
You have seemed hurt a number of times when other posters have dared question your posts too... It's not just me that you've responded to and sounded like a wounded little puppy and have obviously taken offence.
You simply don't like being questioned by anyone. I'll stop responding to you and see how long it takes before you respond to another poster in the same manner :hehe:
Also, if you genuinely were referring to the two different articles, you definitely weren't making it clear in the slightest.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
Edit: "SAD!!!" Steady on there, Trump :hehe:
i really cannot b elieve a grown man takes what is said on here soseriously, have a nice evening.
I can't begin to get my head around the thought processes of someone who would have booed in this case, can anyone on here?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-56150021
Anti-vaxxersQuote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson