Laugh about what , you’re jealous as **** - it’s hilarious
Printable View
Laugh about what , you’re jealous as **** - it’s hilarious
You made an offer, I accepted. No biggie!Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Pmd braQuote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Right , you can have it but you must not contravene data protectionQuote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Apart from looking an idiot, what does that mean?
You know what it means bra, and why copy the PM I sent on here?Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Weird ****
Rent free my Lord …..
Another success for the anti science brigade. Cardiff has the biggest measles outbreak in the UK.
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/h...wsApp_AppShare
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doucas
Stop calling Tony Blair anti science-
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...rmed%20as%20he
https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/e...air/index.html
I think you’re way behind the facts in many areas, hence why you come out with some very different conclusions
Hesitate to ask the same question - but did you read these articles?Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Yeh at the time I did it was well known he opposed it and I’ve no reason not to believe he changed his mind regardless of what you think.Even if he did change his mind the fact that he withheld the information speaks volumes doesn’t it especially in his position at the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
This the same guy who pushed Iraq into war on false claims which resulted in ~4m deaths and displacements - you are trusting him are you :hehe:
I gave you solid advice earlier, I’d loath to see you hiding behind the sofa.
Let's just do this one step at a time
Could you help me find the bit in those articles where Blair opposed the vaccines?
Without sounding like I’m repeating myself , I’m not your personal google search engineQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
This tends to speak volumes - inverted commas , basically as assumption
Blair baby 'has had' MMR jab
The ESRC report demonstrated the high awareness amongst the public of the Leo Blair issue, in spite of it not being the most prominent aspect of the media coverage. In December 2001, during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons, Tony Blair was asked whether his infant son had been immunised with MMR. Mr Blair declined to answer on the basis that it was a private family matter. The perception in the media was that if Leo had been immunised, Mr Blair would have been happy to say so. His wife, Cherie Blair, had been the subject of media reports highlighting her interest in New Age alternative medicine which contributed to the suspicion that Mr Blair was promoting MMR in public but opting out in private. The impact of this issue on immunisation levels is hard to measure in isolation but uptake certainly fell in the wake of the publicity (Fitzpatrick, 2004).
Note - uptake fell in the wake of publicity - so that in itself suggests he was not actually acting in the public’s best interests- ok bra
Given that the "has had" headline came from a completely different Guardian article than the one he posted. Indeed there are 12 years between them, I think you have your answer!Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...23/uk.research
In your opinion, Lardy , sorry CEA , what’s funny though is that if you read an assumed story you agree with it , but if a person with a different opinion posts an assumed story you don’t :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
In conclusion ( which you have failed to mention) :-
The impact of this issue on immunisation levels is hard to measure in isolation but uptake certainly fell in the wake of the publicity (Fitzpatrick, 2004). There is nothing more to say in response the statement- There appears to be overwhelming evidence that, because of his profile at the time, he may have caused deaths in children (with the reduced uptake)
If you want to defend him then you’re a hypocrite.
Just doing my own research. What's not to like?
Of course , when it suits ,MHQuote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Hahahahahahaha you do this every single time. You spout utter nonsense, make a claim. Others ask for evidence of your claim, you reply 'google it', we then Google it and find nothing about the drivel you're speaking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
I guess during your extensive research you would have seen that the prime determinant for the MMR take up was the Lancet article that linked it to autism, which was partially retracted in 2004 and fully in 2010. Rates then rose from around 80% peaking at 93% in 2013/14.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Out of interest, given that take up rates were over 90% at the time of your son's stated 2nd birthday did you follow the science or your opinion or would you rather not say whether he "has had" it?
https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/res...-and-mothers-1
No offence but this is coming from a kid who is too sacred to have kids because of climate change :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Doucas
I bet you have a secret crush of Greta , she a great actress.
Just like Tony Blair it’s a personal matter.Why do you press posters on their kids etc ?Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays