-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Huw good, Giggs bad.
And Dan?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66240304
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
I'm not really into spreading reports that concern people's private lives but as Dan Wootton is a hypocritical waanker (seems apt that description) and more than willing to put the boot in on others, those who live by the sword...
https://bylinetimes.com/2023/07/17/g...shing-scandal/
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Huw good, Giggs bad.
You call Huw a prevert for exchanging sexting images, a common practice in the year 2023, and yet seem to want to defend a man who was having an affair with his brothers wife. Odd.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
You call Huw a prevert for exchanging sexting images, a common practice in the year 2023, and yet seem to want to defend a man who was having an affair with his brothers wife. Odd.
tbf it is possible to find the alleged actions of both morally dubious.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Very bad!
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
You call Huw a prevert for exchanging sexting images, a common practice in the year 2023, and yet seem to want to defend a man who was having an affair with his brothers wife. Odd.
It's common practice for married men to pay young lads who are 40 years younger for graphic sex videos? I need to get out more!
And "seem to be defending", where did you get that from???
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
It's common practise for married men to pay young lads who are 40 years younger for graphic sex videos? I need to get out more!
And "seem to be defending", where did you get that from???
Lads, girls, what does it matter? Have you not heard of Only Fans?
You definitley need to get out more. 30,000+ posts on this one account alone says you need to.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
tbf it is possible to find the alleged actions of both morally dubious.
Quite. But only one was called a prevert by Mr Bales.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
Quite. But only one was called a prevert by Mr Bales.
You could call Giggs a liar, a bully and a cheat, but I'm not sure where prevert comes into it.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
You could call Giggs a liar, a bully and a cheat, but I'm not sure where prevert comes into it.
Is prevert a few weeks before they become a fully fledged pervert:shrug:
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
splott parker
Is prevert a few weeks before they become a fully fledged pervert:shrug:
Best to ask H. Hill about that as I am using his terminology.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Best to ask H. Hill about that as I am using his terminology.
It was a typo, dearest Mr Bales. Out of interest, you say Edwards was exchanging pictures with a young lad. Where has it been confirmed that it was indeed a young lad and not a young lady?
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
It was a typo, dearest Mr Bales. Out of interest, you say Edwards was exchanging pictures with a young lad. Where has it been confirmed that it was indeed a young lad and not a young lady?
Most young girls think it's gross when an old man tries to flirt with them :hehe:
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Most young girls think it's gross when an old man tries to flirt with them :hehe:
That doesnt answer the question. Where was it confirmed?
I think you give a lot of these young girls too much credit. Its big business to those on Only Fans, and id hazard a guess they couldnt give two hoots of peoples marital status, age or looks as long as they are paying their monthly subscription. The instagram lifestyle doesnt come cheap.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Huw good, Giggs bad.
Both bad
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
I think you give a lot of these young girls too much credit. Its big business to those on Only Fans, and id hazard a guess they couldnt give two hoots of peoples marital status, age or looks as long as they are paying their monthly subscription. The instagram lifestyle doesnt come cheap.
He wasn't on Only Fans though, he was looking for a more personal experience.
Regarding giving these young girls too much credit, I got the info from niece who is a switched on young lady. Trust me, it grosses them out.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
That doesnt answer the question. Where was it confirmed?
I think you give a lot of these young girls too much credit. Its big business to those on Only Fans, and id hazard a guess they couldnt give two hoots of peoples marital status, age or looks as long as they are paying their monthly subscription. The instagram lifestyle doesnt come cheap.
That only fans is crazy, why would people pay a fortune for a flash of whatever?
I suppose it's just the modern day more accessible peep shows?
There is always some sado prepared to pay for a flash.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
North Cardiff Blue
There is always some sado prepared to pay for a flash.
In the old days it used to involve a raincoat and a park.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
He wasn't on Only Fans though, he was looking for a more personal experience.
Regarding giving these young girls too much credit, I got the info from niece who is a switched on young lady. Trust me, it grosses them out.
Only Fans, Adultwork, private whats app. etc. Its all one and the same. People paying others for sexual content. Usually older men paying young women but its not gender or age exclusive. The online sex industry is big business for these people.
Young girls are becoming millionaires in their teens / twenties just for flashing their gash. All power to them.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
Only Fans, Adultwork, private whats app. Its all one and the same. The online sex industry is big business for these people.
You seem to think that all young girls are vacuous hoes, which is truly not the case at all.
PS are you an Only Fans member?
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Anyway, I digress Mr Bales, it hasnt been confirmed Edwards was paying a young male, or female, so thats a libelous allegation without foundation.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
You seem to think that all young girls are vacuous hoes, which is truly not the case at all.
PS are you an Only Fans member?
No, im an Only Fans content provider.
You are basing your view of young women in the sex industry on your niece, who, if she is anything like her uncle, is not very worldly.
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
splott parker
Is prevert a few weeks before they become a fully fledged pervert:shrug:
And when do they become a BBC one?
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
Anyway, I digress Mr Bales, it hasnt been confirmed Edwards was paying a young male, or female, so thats a libelous allegation without foundation.
The person involved is not a child, they are a consenting adult, so why are they keeping it quiet?
-
Re: Giggs not to be re-tried
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
The person involved is not a child, they are a consenting adult, so why are they keeping it quiet?
Stop avoiding the question. Why are you stating its a lad when it hasnt been confirmed? You're implying that Mr Edwards is a homosexual.