The whole socio-economic-political system is there to ensure that the people with power and wealth keep it. The peerage system is a small part of it.
Printable View
I don't think they announce who's turned them down until a while after. I think I'm right in saying that LS Lowry holds the record in turning down the most "honours". This is what Ballard had to say when he turned his down and I think he pretty much nails it: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ec/22/uk.books
I agree, there was so much calling for him to be given it, sometimes references made to him being black, that it was almost impossible for him not to get one.
I'd rather it was for outstanding achievements in the community or recognising sportsman perhaps after they retire.
As it is, based on others who have had one in the past then Hamilton certainly also deserves one.
I read something about the Michael Sheen situation. He said that he educated himself about the history of the family and then returned the award. Which sounds a bit fishy to me. You don't exactly need a high level of education to know that Wales has been oppressed by the English monarchy throughout history.
He pays income tax in 9 separate countries and out of a nation of 60 million here he's in the top 5000 highest income tax payers :shrug:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54965544
Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own governments that could honour their citizens.
I have no problem with people from the Celtic nations being recognised. I just think it's weird that they would accept an award from I institution that has subjugated them for centuries. I get that people are loyalist. I just don't understand why. The fact that any people from the island of Ireland would be loyal to the English queen whether they're from Scottish descent or not just blows my mind.
It is the Government that selects the recipients, not the Royal family. Would you prefer BJ sent certificate in the post. If an individual doesn’t want to accept then so be it. As for Drakeford or Sturgeon handing out gongs, yes of course that could be done and some recipients might enjoy that; not sure how many?
All of his Mercedes salary is paid in UK as the company is based in Bracknall or somewhere near there, and he pays full UK tax on all of it. He pays far far more than any of his detractors
It really sickens me when people slag off someone who earns a lot of money. It just stinks of envy.
Yes I know there are some high profile people who cheat but then there are exceptions to everything.
Show me one person who wouldn't want to maximise their income and I'd show you a liar! He earns what he earns because he is the best at what he does.
[QUOTE=City123;5151637]I don't think they announce who's turned them down until a while after. I think I'm right in saying that LS Lowry holds the record in turning down the most "honours". This is what Ballard had to say when he turned his down and I think he pretty much nails it: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ec/22/uk.books[/QUOTE
Do they announce who were offered one and turned it down?
In my memory it is the people who turn down an award who announce it. After all there is no good having a flounce if no one knows about it.
I've got no problem with what people earn as long as they pay the correct amount of tax on those earnings. Its tax receipts remember that will be central to getting the country out of the mess its currently in.
Its excellent that hes one of the UK's highest contributors but everyone should play by the same rules. Thus article suggests that he may not have.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ivate-jet.html
I've no doubt that he's the best Formula 1 driver and one of our most successful sportsmen. He probably deserves his accolades but he should also be under the same scrutiny as every other tax payer in the country.
The point is if he didn't earn a lot of money no one would even question it.
What about all the people who work "cash in hand"? They don't earn his money but you don't see people naming and shaming them, yet they probably defraud the country out of more money as a percentage of their income that he does.
No doubting that but he seems to invite more scrutiny and criticism than anyone else for his tax affairs for some reason. I'm yet to see anyone critcizing Jenson Button or Geraint Thomas for living tax free in Monaco but I've seen several having a go at the amount of tax Hamilton does or doesn't pay here
I'm not questioning his right to live in Monaco and the benefits that entails (a lot of us would given the chance)- I'm querying whether the vat benefit he gained from claiming his private plane was for business purposes only, and not personal use, has been settled one way or the other. If him getting a knighthood means that it has then that's fine. As for his residency status, that was an issue otherwise Boris wouldn't have had to intervene in Lewis's case to allow the knighthood to be awarded. I'm only commenting on what I've read.