Exactly this
Printable View
You come across as Mr Reasonable and seem quite knowledgeable about City and football generally but then you come out with something like this !! Do you think that we would deliberately bring a talented, ball playing, attacking midfielder through our system just so that we can stick him in the first team and try to get him to totally change the way he plays ? He is where he is currently in his development and is the type of player he is because he has been brought through our youth and under 23 systems and taught in the right way to make the most of his natural ability. Instead of giving praise to our current youth development structure and staff for the young players we are bringing through at the moment, you insinuate that he (and others) will fail because we don’t play the right way. How are we supposed to alter the way we play unless we develop our young talent and get them to the first team. Its all doom and gloom isn’t it, as usual.
So you think he hasn't shown ‘a mere semblance of promise’. Everyone else, including the current manager and his coaching staff, the Welsh manager and his coaching staff, all the scouts who have been watching him, the media and most of our fans (including me) are wrong then. I bow to your superior knowledge. :facepalm:
We don't play in a way that suits him.
That's the bare truth mate.
We play to the strengths of players like mozza Flint and Moore. The lumps basically, and that makes sense looking at the team in general.
Not sure what's wrong with bibs post tbh
You must be in the wind up again.
You should employ that tactic a bit more often. This board is about opinions. I thought there was a decent debate going on with varied points of view and then you show up with your faux indignation and start insulting people. Why don't you relax and just try and make your point?
It’s become a viscous circle with the City whereby we’re finally giving players like Colwill a chance, but during all of those years when we weren’t doing that we pursued policies which resulted in the present situation where we’re unable to provide the sort of service to so called flair players in the first half of matches in particular which gets the best out of them. This has made the challenge facing the current crop of youngsters breaking into the side tougher than it needed to be - having a first team which plays in a completely different manner to the age group teams could have been avoided with a bit of planning of a kind that some supporters were calling for when Russell Slade was here.
Very true. My mate is a Yeovil fan and he cannot believe that our Keiffer is the same Keiffer that was on their books in 2013. Seven goals in 50 appearances for Yeovil did not enamour him to their fans but he is obviously a late developer. The same thing could easily apply to Colwill.
After all, who would have thought that a 20 year old loanee called Danny Drinkwater would go on to help Leicester win the Premier League and get 3 England caps in the process.
I've not seen much of him and difficult to give an objective view on someone who is not only young but playing properly in front of probably the largest crowd in his career, not match fit and in a system which is what I doubt he has been used to.
The first half we played narrow with wing backs who not once, that I can remember, overlapped and hit the byline.
It was all too congested in the middle of the park by two teams that looked not to give the other anything. Not a great spectacle and nobody, not just Colwill, caught the eye.
Second half the game opened up and the lad found himself with a bit of time on the ball and made two errors in particular, one of which was a pass and not the preferred shot, and they prompted the substitution.
Colwill obviously has talent but we have not seen what he is capable of, hopefully Mick keeps faith in him and he can rise to the challenge and show us.
Didn't really grab his chance but given our options he should have more this season.
I'm sure most of us are willing him to do well and would be delighted to see more academy players able to compete for starting places.
We played 5-4-1 against Blackpool, and could have scored 5 or 6.
Our 2 best players that day were Bacuna and Giles, who played wide in the 4. Yesterday we replaced them with Colwill and Harris, and it looked like we’d never score.
For me, I’m not sure about Harris…is he a striker, a 10, or a midfielder? He did nothing yesterday, and until Giles came on, we were struggling to create anything.
Another observation, our 2 wing backs (Bagan and Sang) are very inexperienced, and don’t offer us much offensively at the moment, although both look very capable, and will hopefully get better the more they play.
And both were poor at Peterborough, on came Harris & Colwill and Harris' running in particular helped change the game. Sometimes things work, sometimes they don't. Harris has proven himself to be a useful option over the past year or so & Colwill is clearly talented, it just takes time.
Need to give these younger players a chance, if they were perfect then they would have been snapped up by bigger clubs ages ago. Bagan in particular at wingback will make costly mistakes from time to time but its how he learns from it.
I think Peterborough changed shape when they played us as well which obviously shows he did his homework on us. I much prefer Bacuna in a deeper midfield role, it also frees up a spot for a genuine attacking player
I think Harris has improved immensely over the past year or so. When he came into the side under Neil Harris he was effective but didn't seem to have many obvious attributes, when he came back under Mick he looked a far better player with his goal at Birmingham showing that