Three central midfielders in the starting lineup and two more as substitutes. Only two attacking players on the bench.
Printable View
Three central midfielders in the starting lineup and two more as substitutes. Only two attacking players on the bench.
And the Bagan goal machine!Quote:
Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy
For our surge to mid table?Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Looking at the lineup I'd take us scoring :hehe:
Jokes..I think we are going to be scrappy today and I'd take a draw, don't want a nil nil.bht I'd also like us to keep up the trend of not conceding many..
Illness in the camp stillQuote:
Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy
Promising opening
Great chance for Hugill, saved well by Marshall.
Straight swap won't work as he's not a CM.Quote:
Originally Posted by Undercoverinwurzelland
Fiddling the formation about to go with 2CM and using him further forward behind 2 strikers would work, as he actually is an attacking midfielder.
Since I posted that, they have dominated us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wash DC Blue
We are very much the underdogs so far. We are barely keeping them at bay.
I haven’t been Colwills biggest fan in the past but he’s had some nice runs and touches today
poor from ng
Yes he's looked usefulQuote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Bollocks.
Shite clearance. Should have dealt with it.
I wish hugill would stop snapping at shots that are quite obviously not going in, do they talk about percentages? If the shot isn't on turn around and recycle the ball what good is shooting when the ball is behind you?
Oh well there's the first, bit shit defensively that.
And play it to who? There was nobody around himQuote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
There was no point in shooting either. Was never going in. Just giving the ball back.Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
I don't know who, I'm not hugill, but I'm sure with his 2020 vision he could have managed to locate another player in salmon.
And uts not just that occasion, I'm talking in general, he wastes a lot of the ball shooting the impossible.
Cripey according to the QPR commentary we are playing the Brazilian 1970 team posing as QPR.
Id rather him shoot than wait for the perfect goal. The % would be more in favour of a shot on target than lumping it back into midfield.Quote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
Now if we got more bodies around the box I’d agree, but we don’t
Is Ralls on the pitch...?
2nd game in a row he's been MIA
Vaulks totally anonymous as usual.
We've had 25% possession in the first half.
Seemed less than that! Chasing shadows towards end of the halfQuote:
Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy
Why is he playing??Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Gillis
The ball was behind him, there was nobody around him so I can see why he went for it, but its seems like it's something he always does and it's a bad habit because plenty of times he's decided on an impossible angled sjot he HAS had someone to Pass to, like in the first half of this game if you were watching.. now if he had been on a scoring run and was full of confidence I'd understand shooting, I get that he's a goal scorer but faced with a hard angle or a pass a smart striker gives up his personal goal tally and plays the pass.Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Anything else which you've got me?