See Trump has already given her a nickname(laughing Kamala)Quote:
Originally Posted by pipster
Wht does he have to give infantile names to people?
Printable View
See Trump has already given her a nickname(laughing Kamala)Quote:
Originally Posted by pipster
Wht does he have to give infantile names to people?
Simple, it’s done so as to resonate with the majority voter intellect , rather than yourself. Remember he is not trying to get you to vote for him, that’s where people tend not to understand his logic.
The question she needs to find an answer to is - how to respond to his questions as well as ask him questions he will find difficult.
How do you debate with a bully?
Do you call him names back, do you ask him if he gets a kick out of trying to dominate and bully a woman who dares to disagree with him
‘Or just ask him what is it you don’t like about yourself’
She needs to up her game a bit and to put it his way , grab him by the bollox until he changes his tac
He should have called her Kama Kama Kama Kamala Cameleon :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepster
I never thought about it this way.Quote:
Originally Posted by pipster
He meant Donald Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
I'd posted on here previously that a recent "what if" poll by New York Times had Kamela Harries winning in all swing states if she was matched up against Trump.
Of course this is just one random poll and its hardly conclusive but it does raise the possibility of a tighter race in the event Harries is pitched against Trump.
Where this might make a significant difference in swing states in particular (where the war is won or lost) is that the lowest demographic might be more persuaded to actually vote in the first place. This is the demographic which has notoriously low polling numbers in any democracy but Harries might tip the balance in a demographic more likely to vote Democratic than Republican if only they can be persuaded to actually get to the ballot box in the first place.
:thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by pipster
It's good news he's stood down. Respect for that. For Trump and his team....be careful what you wish for.
No need for elaboration, he has already pronounced!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Blue
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...=1#post5520692
HARRISQuote:
Originally Posted by Dorcus
It's Newsom, but he could wait until 2028 if he thinks the failed Trump shooting has hindered his chances. We will find out at the Democrat convention, but Biden was only ever going to be a one-term president for those who were pulling the strings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Blue
Good Lad! I'm glad you're supporting her👍Quote:
Originally Posted by Dembe
Didn't we find out yesterday?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://www.latimes.com/politics/sto...-newsom-harris
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sunday endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president, hours after President Biden announced he would not seek reelection.
“Tough. Fearless. Tenacious,” Newsom said in a post on X, formerly Twitter. “With our democracy at stake, and our future on the line, no one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump’s dark vision and guide our country in a healthier direction than America’s Vice President.”
Newsom has been talked about as a potential presidential candidate after Biden’s left office and over the two years has been raising his profile by speaking out on national issues, debating Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and served as a Biden campaign surrogate.
Since Biden’s disastrous debate performance, Newsom has remained a public supporter of the president. Earlier this month, he said he would not challenge Harris for the presidency in 2024.
“Of course,” Newsom said when asked whether he stood by comments he made last year about not running against Harris. “Yes.”
I'll be supporting her just for the giggles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorcus
You are entitled to believe whatever you want, even things like Biden suddenly starting to use Twitter and also drawing a line underneath his signature.Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
I do not believe Biden suddenly started to use Twitter or draw a line under his signature.
I think it was someone else on behalf of Biden.
I also think recent events - and recent statements - have exposed as bollux your ITK claims about the New World Order having Newsom lined up as Democratic nominee for over 2 years.
And I'm entitled to believe that!
You mean the switcheroo isn't happening and it isn't as plain as day?Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
As Kamala herself would say ... hahahahahahaha!Quote:
Originally Posted by pipster
Shame on Democrats and media who gaslighted the world about Biden. Gutless sleazy bunch.
They staid silent that includes, Clinton's, Obama, VP Harris. Oh and the Liberal left media.
This didn't just happen he was a useless VP.
Don't forget those on here who have also been pretending for the past four years!Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
Extremely weird to even have an interest in American politics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorcus
Not at all. American politics influences us all, whether it be regarding Middle East policy, NATO issues, Chinese expansionism in the Pacific, Ukraine, global economics and a lot else. Not being interested in American politics is hugely myopic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dembe
Well this is all good to see
I would absolutely love to see Kamala Harris as President
At the very least a black woman would be a double whammy for the right wing in America
I bet trump and his followers are itching a bit now
She's a striking looking woman too
Weird? If you don’t realise why this is important I guess it’s not worth explaining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dembe