ah thats a blast from the pastQuote:
Originally Posted by Taunton Blue Genie
Printable View
ah thats a blast from the pastQuote:
Originally Posted by Taunton Blue Genie
Interestingly, Ufologists amongst other groups believe the Anunnaki were aliens as well as the orbs.
Aliens aside, I do have an interest in Ancient civilisations. I imagine Graham Hancock's theories about advanced ancient civilisations are not compatible with your beliefs. But it's clear that whoever built the pyramids and many other architectural wonders around the ancient world were very advanced. And since many credible witnesses from the US authorities have recently come forward and said that the US (and probably other superpowers) have been backward engineering UFOs for the last 80 years, I'm now starting to think this all adds credence to the possibility that the ancient world was built by aliens and led to the creation of the many religions we see today. It's all connected.
I've watched Graham's Hancock's tv programs, and while he's got an entertaining theory it really doesn't stand up to much scrutiny at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
I read Fingerprints of the Gods and another of Hancock's books almost 30 years ago. The new Erich van Daniken, and just as daft.Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
Hancock to my mind is a fraud. He picks out objects and places and and events and random stars to connect the dots in any way that makes his argument - ignoring the vast weight of data that doesn't fit his pre-selected conclusions.
He has made a livelihood out of it. It is mildly entertaining for a while - but then to me just gets annoying. It is of the same standard as those crappy American history channels that major on finding the Arc of the Covenant and an inscribed tomb of a Templar in a cave in Arkansas!
Oooh... I'd say there is a huge difference in terms of credibility between Hancock and van Daniken. Not comparable imho, but I understand where you're coming from. But Hancock aside, there are lots of other researchers out there who are questioning the engineering in a lot of ancient artifacts that just does not fit in with our understanding of human capability at that time. In fact, there are many examples which we'd struggle to achieve even with today's technology. I'm talking about things like perfect symmetry within thousands of an inch.Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
[QUOTE=stevo;5564164I'm now starting to think this all adds credence to the possibility that the ancient world was built by aliens and led to the creation of the many religions we see today. It's all connected.[/QUOTE]
Funny you should say that, but all false religion can be traced back to either an individual angel or a cluster of them.
I don’t know how many of you are following the “drone” story, but NewsNation have interviewed a high-ranking US military bloke, who was involved in the backward-engineering of captured alien UFOs. Will be available on YouTube 2:00am Sunday (UK time). Here’s a preview:
https://youtube.com/shorts/Z8G1YObjP...IESG9DA39bICF1
Was there anything of interest to you Stevo?Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
Sorry I didn't reply to your question - it was an interesting interview, but the video evidence he provided was underwhelming.Quote:
Originally Posted by truthpaste
But bringing this thread up-to-date, before Trump came into power, he promised he would spill the beans regarding the drones on day 1 of his presidency. It took him about a week to get an answer and his press office gave a statement the other day, saying they're all FAA approved and some of it is research-related and basically, there's nothing to see here. What a load of nonsense.
I see only two possible explanations here:
1. The US secret services are lying to the Trump administration
2. The Trump administration are lying to the American people and doing exactly what they accused the Biden administration of doing.
well there IS another possible explanation....Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
Or:Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
3. Nobody is meant to know any more at this stage, but in the greater scheme of things, when the time comes for the story to break, then people will remember these sightings and it will see them jump to the wrong conclusion.
Which is what exactly because they’re certainly not telling the truth?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
As we all now live in a post-truth culture, this is unfortunately what we should expect.Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
Wherever you look, the end time biblical scenario is rapidly falling into place. When we read reports like "A 2021 government report warned that the river (Euphrates) could run dry by 2040", then that leads those who have studied and listed the things (that must be happening or about to happen) to be aware that something is unfolding very quickly.Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
You mentioned Ezekiel (born around 623 BC), yet he is just one of many prophets given visions by God, and prophecies from many others including John, Jude, Luke, Mark, Paul, Peter, Amos, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Hosea, Joel, David (etc) have seen the majority of their prophecies now fulfilled, with ZERO prophecies needing to be fulfilled before God's next major play!
Furthermore, all the prophecies including those written almost 3000 years ago that have already been fulfilled have happened exactly as the Bible said they would; which means we can expect 100% accuracy going forward too.
Bet your house is a bundle of laughsQuote:
Originally Posted by truthpaste
Great nights out in Bridgend, fond memories
People who read probably spend a bit less time laughing than those at a funny farm, granted.Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepster
On balance, I'd rather understand WHERE we are in history and what comes next.
"Show me a family of readers, and I will show you the people who move the world" – Napoleon Bonaparte
Turned out well for him :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by truthpaste
This is how History records his life:-"regarded as one of history's greatest military leaders".Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepster
Hardly a failure.
Ultimately he failed.Quote:
Originally Posted by truthpaste
Because he died? Can you give the reason/s for your verdict?Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepster
Yes he lost in battle.Quote:
Originally Posted by truthpaste
He did, so we can agree to disagree on the value of his legacy.Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepster
It's a reminder that eventually we all get to lose, 100% of people die.
Making preparations for when people say we've 'passed on' is wise.
I've chosen a good 'pass' rather than leave it to chance :thumbup:
When you die that is it no trumpets or angels.Quote:
Originally Posted by truthpaste
And beyond wishful thinking, what evidence do you have for that?Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepster