Are you saying it was some sort of conspiracy? :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by goslow
Printable View
Are you saying it was some sort of conspiracy? :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by goslow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R
Assassination
A conspiracy just means more than one person involved which there irrefutably was.
The Russian angle is not without merit. JFK publicly reached out to the Ruskies publically but he and his brother played a dangerous double game with them.
I don't buy it though. His enemy was homegrown I think. That speech I posted at the foot of the last page will have made him a lot of enemies. Enemies who were the most powerful people in the world.
The USA and Russia are like Celtic and Rangers - they need each other more than they hate each other. They don't go around killing each other's leaders. They try to embarrass each other for sure and they have proxy wars but they are not stupid. Do you think Jack Ruby was a KGB agent?Quote:
Originally Posted by goslow
A conspiracy was possible but not irrefutable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue in the Face
Here's an interesting article on Ruby.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabalphaville
http://jfklancer.com/mobconnections.html
The evidence that he was shot from the front is compelling to the point of being conclusive for me Gab. The fact all evidence to support this was surpressed only compounds the likelihood that the front shot evidence has credence at least. The Zapruder film was not even seen until 1975. The technical ideas that the film has been tampered with are very compelling. It shows the presidents head kicks back quite clearly from being shot from the front. All witnesses that didn't support the Warren commission narrative of the shots coming from the book depository was thrown out. Bits of skull were found behind the position where the motorcade would have been on bullet impact. When Jacqie climbs onto the back of the motorcade she's reaching for some of JFK's brain. Again behind. Audio was accidentally recorded by the police (also suppressed), the echoes when analysed show that shots came from two different positions. And then there's the footage of all those people running up the grass bank (some having ducked because of shots coming from this area) to chase the 2nd shooter. And there's avalanche more stuff too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabalphaville
Oswald is involved somehow. He was maneuvered by powerful US forces for some time leading up to the event. He could be a patsy. Or one of two shooters. One thing that needs to be questioned more is how he came to have the job in the book depository a month before the act. He was a known "traitor" by this point.
Have you seen this before?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue in the Face
"Zionist Mole Zapruder and the Mossad Connection to JFK Assassination"
http://nodisinfo.com/26630/
Poor old LHO - he carries off the most audacious political assassination of the twentieth century and everybody on this board wants to give the credit to somebody else. There’s no justice.
Thanks Dave. I have come across this accusation before. While it's interesting, something doesn't add up with discrediting Zapruder. After all he shot this film which disqualifies the magic bullet theory and the lone book depository gunman notion. There is a lot of evidence to suggest that both he and his film was manipulated after the fact though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott David
As an aside, his depiction in the film "Parkland" is utterly laughable. The film uses his tears as an excuse to not actually show you the Zapruder film footage, which shows The killshot was from the front.
It makes you ask the question, who made "Parkland" and why?
He seemed to not want want credit for it after the fact though Gab? Then silenced by a mob human before anyone heard what he had to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabalphaville
Can I ask what sources you've got your viewpoint from? Any books or docs? I'd like to check them out if so. Maybe I need to re-educate myself on the subject as I simply cannot buy the lone gunman theory at all. But I would rather that was the truth.
There are lots of things which simply don't make any sense as far as the official narrative on JFK's assassination is concerned. You rightly mentioned the Zapruder film and how it transpires it was doctored or altered.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue in the Face
http://www.rense.com/general96/missingframes.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by goslow
What about those in bold ?
The best book I've read on him is Marina and Lee by Priscilla Johnson McMillan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue in the Face
Cheers Gab! Will definitely check it out. :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabalphaville