'Huggy Bear says that word on the street' is that Son in law Mr J Kushner - who has rapidly found himself rather rapidly and increasingly 'distanced' from/by the President - might be taking a turn in the barrel next.
Who knows .. will soon see.
Printable View
'Huggy Bear says that word on the street' is that Son in law Mr J Kushner - who has rapidly found himself rather rapidly and increasingly 'distanced' from/by the President - might be taking a turn in the barrel next.
Who knows .. will soon see.
^^
Skip to 2:54 - thats where the action is ;)
Still all seems to be about opinions at the moment. We'll know what happens as it unfolds - or doesn't
Dershowitz is a known liberal and a scholar of United States constitutional law. He is not some news hack desperate to score political points.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vimto
OK calm down! its getting like the football section over here :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
You watch those 'liberals' mind there was a chap warning us about them on here only a few days ago ;)
I mean he's backing Trump's position and not trying to demolish him like the rest of the liberals are, and he seems to be speaking from a position of authority on the matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vimto
OK, thanks for explaining that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
No problem, you are a good egg :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vimto
Who is Q-Anon?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
The Calm before the Stormy :sherlock:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...daniels-report
Why is there so much internet and media noise going on, distraction after distraction, you'd think they were trying to keep people's attention away from something :sherlock:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
I thought you wanted to know about Q-Anon which seems all about Stormy....or have I got that bit wrong?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
All the noise and distractions seem a bit stormy, everybody is going nuts.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Here is something more helpful but probably a bit too logical for your taste.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://medium.com/@willsommer/meet-...t-3ec94bf7d8a3
Yes, you are right. I am talking about my twitter feed, everybody is having a meltdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
That reads like Gluey's greatest hits. There's only a couple that he hasn't done on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Not so much itk as feeding off crumbs!Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
It’s like some strange cult that seeps into the sub concious. One of my jobs when I’m not doing my business activities is driving people to their places of work. One of the people I drop off (nice lady, always polite) has mentioned to me in last week :
Donald Trump is doing a great job but the elites won’t let him
Clinton Foundation
EU Fabian society
Elites (again)
Then this Pizza parlour conspiracy
I challenged her when she mentioned Sandyhook not being right
I asked her. Where do you get this info then? Told me it’s all over the Internet before sending me a Facebook message later of a link to Breitbart and Fox News and even worse Infowars and that shameful Sandyhook conspiracy nonsense. .
Must be some sort of start up kit you get for subscribing. Those bellends I mention in the White Pendragons Sadique Khan thread have obviously subscribed to it as well.
You're a funny guy, everything I have posted on here is now under official investigation, while your only contribution has been to serve as a fake news Trump Russia Collusion megaphone :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
I'm getting mixed messages on what you think an investigation means. Is it certain guilt or fake news? Or does it depend?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Investigations undertaken by congressional oversight committees, federal law enforcement, the department of justice, and the office of the inspect general, as opposed to stuff being made up by corrupt government officials, the MSM, various "unnamed" sources, Fusion GPS, and shady ex-British spies.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Like the investigation by Robert Mueller’s team? That looks pretty official to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Yeah, like that if the wheels don't fall off due to some bad appointments to his team.Quote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
Trump's own son publishes details of a meeting with Russians with the express purpose of finding dirt on an opponent, and yet you still say it's all made up. Incredible really.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Who were those Russians? Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS met with them the day before, on the day, and the day after the meeting. Absolutely Incredible really!Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
How does that absolve Little Trump?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The meeting was setup by Fusion GPS/FBI/Clinton/Obama, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Which doesn't explain why Young Trump accepted it with such vigour and enthusiasm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
All this Russia talk is made up by the MSM, yet no one told Michael Flynn. The silly goose admitted lying to the FBI about his meetings with the Russians, he should have just told them it's all made up, all of it!
Now talk of hundreds, or possibly over a thousand Americans who were connected to the 2016 election being unmasked for political purposes.
https://mobile.twitter.com/FoxNews/s...044864/video/1
It was a legal meeting, he didn't do anything wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Why the continual attempted/failed cover ups?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl4GFmoGlm8Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
You really should come down off that fence you know :hehe:.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
I can't answer for Michael Flynn, but I am sure we will find out one day. He is a former head of military intelligence, so I'm sure he would have known a lot about what was going on behind the scenes, which incidentally is starting to look pretty badQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Unless he was doing it in his sleep, I'd imagine he does know a little.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
I'm taking a factual position here Bob, just see for yourself the stuff that is starting to come out. If this is happening in America it could happen anywhere. The whole democratic process is under threat. Like I said nearly a year ago, this is way bigger than Watergate, and we haven't even got to the spying in congress yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
House Report Concluded Pakistanis Made ‘Unauthorized Access’ To Congressional Servers
[Cont ...]Quote:
House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.
Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen.
When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed.
The presentation, written by the House’s Office of the Inspector General, reported under the bold heading “UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS” that “5 shared employee system administrators have collectively logged into 15 member offices and the Democratic Caucus although they were not employed by the offices they accessed.”
It found indications that a House “server is being used for nefarious purposes and elevated the risk that individuals could be reading and/or removing information” and “could be used to store documents taken from other offices.” The server was that of the House Democratic Caucus, a sister group of the DNC that was run at the time by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/16/ho...ional-servers/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTcnjFFSRzE
Always knew you were right on this one. Well done you!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Bumpety Bump :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays