Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Quote:
Originally Posted by
xsnaggle
The law must set a line somewhere. If 16 is too young where do you think it should be Set?
Try telling 17 Yr old girls that they are too young to make a decision about having sex and see how far you get.
It may be OK for them to have sex, but surely that means with people close to their own age? Why would anyone too old want to do it just because the law says they can? My niece and nephew are both over 21 I'm 35 I would feel weird as **** going with anyone close to that age, even if the law says I can.
A 21 year old going with a 21 year old is legal. As is it a 1u year old its still a bit weird in my opinion.
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
It may be OK for them to have sex, but surely that means with people close to their own age? Why would anyone too old want to do it just because the law says they can? My niece and nephew are both over 21 I'm 35 I would feel weird as **** going with anyone close to that age, even if the law says I can.
A 21 year old going with a 21 year old is legal. As is it a 1u year old its still a bit weird in my opinion.
I agree with you , a bloke who is in his thirties having sex with a 21 year old is odd
It happens but its odd
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Quote:
Originally Posted by
xsnaggle
The law must set a line somewhere. If 16 is too young where do you think it should be Set?
Try telling 17 Yr old girls that they are too young to make a decision about having sex and see how far you get.
I dont think the age of consent is too young, it's about right. But older fellas with 16 and 17 year olds, just because you could doesn't mean you should.
Stick to your age group, until you're over 30
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chrisp_1927
I've almost become immune to the scumbags like him now. What gets me as or more angry are the idiots who didn't sack him. When presented with that evidence, who in their right minds think 'we'll just give him an informal warning'. They're guilty of letting him get away with it.
Edited
1. He was already working his notice.
2. You can’t dismiss anyone without some sort of process including an investigation, the club suspended him instantly and instigated that process.
What more could the club do?
