-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
https://ourplnt.com/north-magnetic-pole-location/
Here's a different website that suggests that the magnetic north is actually currently closer to the geometric north pole than at any point in the last several hundred years.
It also lists sources at the bottom.
It's quite interesting actually
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
That article is laughably poor.
It says "evidence suggests" and then fails to mention what the actual evidence is.
Yes the poles are wandering around - they always have.
And they could be on their way to "flipping", but we just don't know.
There could be catastrophic events associated with a pole flip - but we don't know and eminent scientists I've heard talk about the subject think that there probably won't be as there is no evidence of mass extinctions during any of the other pole flips in history.
It then talks about Isaac Newton making a prediction about the end of the world, based on studying the bible and links that back to the poles flipping - with nothin to really suggest that's what he meant and it was based on a load of nonsense anyway.
Any website called endtimesand2019 when it's now 2022 is on the back foot from the start to be fair :hehe:
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
https://ourplnt.com/north-magnetic-pole-location/
Here's a different website that suggests that the magnetic north is actually currently closer to the geometric north pole than at any point in the last several hundred years.
It also lists sources at the bottom.
It's quite interesting actually
Indeed. Anyone who uses maritime navigational charts is aware of the annual rate of change between true north and magnetic north.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
this is very basic stuff to refute.
the Van Allen belts were known about at the time of the Apollo missions, they calculated how much exposure they thought they would receive during the few hours they spent crossing the belts and the astronauts wore dosimeters that were reviewed after they returned, which showed they'd received pretty much the amount of radiation they had expected.
That was a rebuttal?
Where's your evidence that any state has sent a man farther than 400 miles away during the past five decades? It should be easy-peasy to provide some.
I'm sure Cyril and a few others have desperately searched for evidence that the Chinese, Indians, Russians, The European Space Agency or some other country has in order to refute my assertion but they have failed to find any because none exists.
Again, it was somehow possible between 1969 to 1972 to send man 240 thousand miles to the Moon (that's six hundred times farther than 400 miles) but it's proved impossible to get someone as little as 500 miles ever since?
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
That was a rebuttal?
Where's your evidence that any state has sent a man farther than 400 miles away during the past five decades? It should be easy-peasy to provide some.
I'm sure Cyril and a few others have desperately searched for evidence that the Chinese, Indians, Russians, The European Space Agency or some other country has in order to refute my assertion but they have failed to find any because none exists.
Again, it was somehow possible between 1969 to 1972 to send man 240 thousand miles to the Moon (that's six hundred times farther than 400 miles) but it's proved impossible to get someone as little as 500 miles ever since?
Haven't NASA announced that the Artemis project intends sending astronauts to the Moon again in 2025? Can you link to a source regarding NASA having lost the technology to do so, by the way?
And you didn't answer my question as to why the Russians don't seem to have declared the moon landings as fake.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
I didn't answer your Russia question as I viewed it as a deliberate distraction to the discussion at hand. But for what it's worth, I believe the so-called Cold War was another hoax. Russia and USA spent over 40 years sabre rattling while their troops never fired a single bullet in their arch-enemy's direction. The mutual bogeyman threat served to keep both their populations in fear while the connected got rich off of building nukes and tons of other armaments.
Eisenhower knew what the game was. Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech Origins and Significance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
As for your other query. How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon - https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2...h=2abbf7bb1f48
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
I didn't answer your Russia question as I viewed it as a deliberate distraction to the discussion at hand. But for what it's worth, I believe the so-called Cold War was another hoax. Russia and USA spent over 40 years sabre rattling while their troops never fired a single bullet in their arch-enemy's direction. The mutual bogeyman threat served to keep both their populations in fear while the connected got rich off of building nukes and tons of other armaments.
Eisenhower knew what the game was. Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech Origins and Significance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
As for your other query. How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon -
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2...h=2abbf7bb1f48
If it suited them both so well, why did they end it?
Oh, let me guess. The ending is a hoax and the hoax Cold War is still going on.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
I didn't answer your Russia question as I viewed it as a deliberate distraction to the discussion at hand. But for what it's worth, I believe the so-called Cold War was another hoax. Russia and USA spent over 40 years sabre rattling while their troops never fired a single bullet in their arch-enemy's direction. The mutual bogeyman threat served to keep both their populations in fear while the connected got rich off of building nukes and tons of other armaments.
Eisenhower knew what the game was. Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech Origins and Significance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
As for your other query. How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon -
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2...h=2abbf7bb1f48
The latter link isn't inconsistent with the new project being built on newer technology as the article does refer to the complications and drawbacks of merely tweaking existing designs and the need to sometimes start from scratch again. However, you now seem to suggest that the Russians and Americans were involved in a 40-year-old conspiracy (which provided me with a 40-year career in the MoD, so I can't complain).
Do you have a matrix of the various conspiracies you believe in/discuss/promote etc? I get confused with the Bilderbergers, The Illuminati, The US-Russia conspiracy, the Great Reset, The Chinese Covid conspiracy, the global vax conspiracy etc etc etc. Are they all lnked and part of the same thing or how do you reconcile one against the other, old fruit?
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
If it suited them both so well, why did they end it?
Oh, let me guess. The ending is a hoax and the hoax Cold War is still going on.
If you would take my advice to enrol on a critical thinking course then you may be able to answer your questions without my help.
I recall Putin visiting the scene of where three towers fell in 2001. He, with a straight face, blamed "terrorists." You know, a gaggle of blokes with huge beards armed with Stanley knives. Nowt to do with those Mossad agents, the 'Dancing Israelis', who also happened to be demolition experts.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
If you would take my advice to enrol on a critical thinking course then you may be able to answer your questions without my help.
I recall Putin visiting the scene of where three towers fell in 2001. He, with a straight face, blamed "terrorists." You know, a gaggle of blokes with huge beards armed with Stanley knives. Nowt to do with those Mossad agents, the 'Dancing Israelis', who also happened to be demolition experts.
But I'm very stupid, you tell me that weekly. Can't you tell me why they ended the so-called Cold War that was so profitable for them both? I'm definitely too stupid to work this out for myself. Don't go trying to confuse me with 9/11, it's almost like you're changing the subject!
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
That was a rebuttal?
Where's your evidence that any state has sent a man farther than 400 miles away during the past five decades? It should be easy-peasy to provide some.
I'm sure Cyril and a few others have desperately searched for evidence that the Chinese, Indians, Russians, The European Space Agency or some other country has in order to refute my assertion but they have failed to find any because none exists.
Again, it was somehow possible between 1969 to 1972 to send man 240 thousand miles to the Moon (that's six hundred times farther than 400 miles) but it's proved impossible to get someone as little as 500 miles ever since?
It’s pretty obvious why nobody has bothered sending anyone much further out into space, unless you’re going to the moon Or another celestial body there’s nothing there. Surely anything you can do 10000 km into space you could also do 400km into space?
And they haven’t been back to the moon because there hasn’t been a good reason to. Robots can do a lot more these days and it’s very expensive to go there
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
It’s pretty obvious why nobody has bothered sending anyone much further out into space, unless you’re going to the moon Or another celestial body there’s nothing there. Surely anything you can do 10000 km into space you could also do 400km into space?
And they haven’t been back to the moon because there hasn’t been a good reason to. Robots can do a lot more these days and [COLOR="#000000"]it’s very expensive to go there[/COLOR]
I don’t think money has anything to do with it.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
I don’t think money has anything to do with it.
That would be a first in the US.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
I don’t think money has anything to do with it.
really? well the sums involved are - if you'll forgive the pun - astronomical.
NASAs budget during the apollo program was about 4% of the federal budget, these days it is around 0.5%
If it isn't anything to do with budget then what do you think it is about?
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Just googled an article, albeit 2018 , NASA doesn't occupy a large portion of the federal budget at all, clocking in at a 0.4% of the 2018 budget. Even then, it's not like the money that goes into NASA is being wasted. Each dollar that goes into NASA adds $7-14 to the economy.
Anybody seen the Wiki-Leaks article on the moon landings , it’s quite interesting.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
If you would take my advice to enrol on a critical thinking course then you may be able to answer your questions without my help.
I recall Putin visiting the scene of where three towers fell in 2001. He, with a straight face, blamed "terrorists." You know, a gaggle of blokes with huge beards armed with Stanley knives. Nowt to do with those Mossad agents, the 'Dancing Israelis', who also happened to be demolition experts.
Was Corbyn there ?
He is keen on attending memorials with bearded fellas :sherlock:.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Just googled an article, albeit 2018 , NASA doesn't occupy a large portion of the federal budget at all, clocking in at a 0.4% of the 2018 budget. Even then, it's not like the money that goes into NASA is being wasted. Each dollar that goes into NASA adds $7-14 to the economy.
Anybody seen the Wiki-Leaks article on the moon landings , it’s quite interesting.
Is the Wikileaks article concerned unrelated to what is referred to here? :
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/f...ge/9217263002/
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taunton Blue Genie
Not that one. The one where a lot of the space walks etc are filmed under water to replicate zero gravity.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Not that one. The one where a lot of the space walks etc are filmed under water to replicate zero gravity.
¿Fuente, por favor?
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Not that one. The one where a lot of the space walks etc are filmed under water to replicate zero gravity.
Giant steps are what you take, walking in the pool - Sting.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Giant steps are what you take, walking in the pool - Sting.
:hehe:
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taunton Blue Genie
It is a wryly ironic that people posting about the gullibility of people who consume mainstream media will happily accept stuff purporting to come from Wikileaks as proof without ever checking if they have been duped or not.
It would be fun to see the "Wikileaks" article that isn't based on out-takes from Capricorn one showing lot of the space walks etc that are filmed under water to replicate zero gravity to test this theory, but somehow I doubt this will every make it off the cutting room floor!.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
The WEF shills plan is to cower in fear behind their front doors and obediently remain on their knees as the purchasing power of their income and life savings is reduced to nothing whatsoever. And those few who should miraculously emerge from a total societal collapse having swerved being eaten by starving human predators will have to agree to exchange all their assets for a box room in a world government hostel where they will be provided with a free 18" telly to ensure they remain happy and docile when they tuck into their daily allowance of bugs and worms.
Naturally, they will also have to agree to have a microchip implanted in their head to 'enhance their safety and security'.
Klaus and the boys are determined to deliver this new reality by 31-12-2029 at the very latest.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
The WEF shills plan is to cower in fear behind their front doors and obediently remain on their knees as the purchasing power of their income and life savings is reduced to nothing whatsoever. And those few who should miraculously emerge from a total societal collapse having swerved being eaten by starving human predators will have to agree to exchange all their assets for a box room in a world government hostel where they will be provided with a free 18" telly to ensure they remain happy and docile when they tuck into their daily allowance of bugs and worms.
Naturally, they will also have to agree to have a microchip implanted in their head to 'enhance their safety and security'.
Klaus and the boys are determined to deliver this new reality by 31-12-2029 at the very latest.
I love it, very good.
Perhaps I can make a suggestion towards the next part:
CHAPTER 2
SATAN KLAUS AND HIS SLAY
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
I did look into the theories years back but was left undecided and more than a little bewildered by it all.
The most interesting one I thought was that it is indeed true and all governments have done so since the mid-1990s. Not as a covert population control measure to poison enough of them to keep typical life expectancy from going too high, but for a beneficent purpose... to help shield the world's population from the effects of a weakening magnetosphere and the increase in radiation.
Those that promote it say in late March or early April 2023, with March 23 the most forecasted date, the earth will suffer a catastrophic magnetic pole reversal. These reversals, they maintain, occur on average every 12,700 years.
It's said if and when it happens it will be so violent most people will die instantly as virtually every structure on the surface will collapse and for those outdoors who are standing will suffer broken legs at a minimum. Survivors would then have to contend with monster-sized tsunamis. All those not high enough above sea level will drown.
Further, the connected billionaires who are aware of what's inevitable believe they can survive it inside their underground cities that they have been constructing for decades. The largest of which is directly beneath Denver airport in Colorado, USA.
not long to go now - march 23 is fast approaching
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
not long to go now - march 23 is fast approaching
First we've got to deal with the massive earthquake in California by tomorrow.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
First we've got to deal with the massive earthquake in California by tomorrow.
Don't forget the "something" that was happening last night that meant U.S. politicians were heading for their secret bunkers.
The MSM probably won't report what happened.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
First we've got to deal with the massive earthquake in California by tomorrow.
Poor Californians, aren't they still recovering from the 10+ magnitude earthquake that hit them in early February? Odd why there's been zero coverage of it. Hopefully Mr OM can find a twitter link about it.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Canton Kev
Poor Californians, aren't they still recovering from the 10+ magnitude earthquake that hit them in early February? Odd why there's been zero coverage of it. Hopefully Mr OM can find a twitter link about it.
The news of it has been suppressed by MSM. Similarly, the polar shift, just over two weeks away, will be kept quiet. You will only be aware of it when using your compass outside the bunker.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
That's a bit unfair Bob. It's the first time that Ofcom has ruled against them.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
This one is interesting , no mistake here it appears
https://twitter.com/gbnews/status/16...LhmySD2aRt-GNg
Care to comment ?
Again the rule makers were the rule breakers ….. hmmmmmmmm
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
You think I’m defending the likes of Hancock by posting that? What I’m talking about is the anti vaxer agenda followed by that channel and the people on here who make unsubstantiated claims about the vaccine.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
You think I’m defending the likes of Hancock by posting that? What I’m talking about is the anti vaxer agenda followed by that channel and the people on here who make unsubstantiated claims about the vaccine.
Perhaps they are unsubstantiated but I try to keep,out of the vax debate I don’t know much about it apart from it’s no longer required for under 50’s , it doesn’t prevent transmission and apparently natural immunity is just as good.
I also know (Knew) that the variant agenda was “Deployed” as a fear tactic towards the population according to the Lockdown Files.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Perhaps they are unsubstantiated but I try to keep,out of the vax debate I don’t know much about it apart from it’s no longer required for under 50’s , it doesn’t prevent transmission and apparently natural immunity is just as good.
I also know (Knew) that the variant agenda was “Deployed” as a fear tactic towards the population according to the Lockdown Files.
So you now know that someone who wasn't vaccinated was equally likely to contract covid from a vaccinated covid sufferer or a non-vaccinated covid sufferer. (Spoiler alert, that vaccinated person was far less likely to contract it in the first place and even more less likely to pass it on to a vaccinated person).
Also unvaccinated people (that's everybody before we had vaccines) who survived covid had just as good immunity as vaccinated people (Spoiler alert, but far greater chance of death or ill-health when contracted).
Any other pearls of revision....sorry wisdom?
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
So you now know that someone who wasn't vaccinated was equally likely to contract covid from a vaccinated covid sufferer or a non-vaccinated covid sufferer. (Spoiler alert, that vaccinated person was far less likely to contract it in the first place and even more less likely to pass it on to a vaccinated person).
Also unvaccinated people (that's everybody before we had vaccines) who survived covid had just as good immunity as vaccinated people (Spoiler alert, but far greater chance of death or ill-health when contracted).
Any other pearls of revision....sorry wisdom?
What are mumbling on about now FFS :wave:
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
This morning ….. surely not? Got to be some sort of mistake
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ccine-dr-sara/
ITV News , surely Not…..
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/i...m-b975928.html
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
What are mumbling on about now FFS :wave:
Jesus, it's like debating with Oscar Wilde. Stick to smileys if it's too tough.
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Jesus, it's like debating with Oscar Wilde. Stick to smileys if it's too tough.
I’m not interested in what you have to say old bean ….. you’re draining …..get the message …. :wave:
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
They should absolutely be picked up for airing false statistics and claims on their channel.
That's probably not the bite that you wanted, sorry.
