Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hilts
I cant believe that after that shit show yesterday the suggestion of who Tan should have appointed was the man in charge of the shit opposition. Critchley ffs.������
All ears on who you'd have in charge.
As usual just have little digs with very little constructive.
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
All ears on who you'd have in charge.
As usual just have little digs with very little constructive.
Under our current circumstances id stick with Hudson.
We have no money a shit squad and are under a transfer embargo.
I dont think any of that is Hudsons fault and by the looks of QPR your suggestion of Critchley would have meant more money wasted.
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hilts
Under our current circumstances id stick with Hudson.
We have no money a shit squad and are under a transfer embargo.
I dont think any of that is Hudsons fault and by the looks of QPR your suggestion of Critchley would have meant more money wasted.
He's been there two games.
He has 4 points. More than we have in our last 5 games.
I'd prefer Critchley.
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Bristol City. Not having a great season are they - level on points with City. Allegedly a well-run club with attentive, on- the-job owners, excellent young players, shorn of all their over-the-hill players to the likes of us, and play some decent attacking football. Perennial play-off hopefuls most seasons until November. Yes, it feels like a club neglected by dis-interested owners, but the 1st thing to address is hitting the back of the net - how Hudson or any other manager tackles that is anyone's guess...
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Bristol City. Not having a great season are they - level on points with City. Allegedly a well-run club with attentive, on- the-job owners, excellent young players, shorn of all their over-the-hill players to the likes of us, and play some decent attacking football. Perennial play-off hopefuls most seasons until November. Yes, it feels like a club neglected by dis-interested owners, but the 1st thing to address is hitting the back of the net - how Hudson or any other manager tackles that is anyone's guess...
Indeed. It's a pity the previous manager didn't address the problem when he had the chance. After all, he had more than enough time.
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Bristol City. Not having a great season are they - level on points with City. Allegedly a well-run club with attentive, on- the-job owners, excellent young players, shorn of all their over-the-hill players to the likes of us, and play some decent attacking football. Perennial play-off hopefuls most seasons until November. Yes, it feels like a club neglected by dis-interested owners, but the 1st thing to address is hitting the back of the net - how Hudson or any other manager tackles that is anyone's guess...
Judging my their latest accounts they (Bristol) are certainly not a well run club.
Lansdown and Bristol sport keeping them with a whisker of a points deduction
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J R Hartley
Hudson hasn’t even been given a transfer window, he deserves that at least. Assuming we can get the embargo lifted.
When Morison was still working with Mcarthys squad people were saying can’t judge him until he’s had chance to bring some of his own
players in. Same should apply to Hudson.
Personally, I don’t think Hudson is the answer
long term. I would have liked to seen us take a risk with a foreign manager or an up and coming manager with a name. I said ages before he went to Boro I’d like to have seen Carrick here.
Carrick or the lad at Ipswich would've got my vote. Unfortunately, I don't think anyone with any ambition would consider touching City with a shiity stick?
Our manager choices suggest the club from the outset were aiming low and currently achieving lower. I honestly think the boards objective was just to stay up? I suppose its mission accomplished if the league table remains the same?
Crunch game with Wigan incoming. My lad can't wait.
Re: Message to Tan and the board
[QUOTE=J R Hartley;5375996
Personally, I don’t think Hudson is the answer
long term. I would have liked to seen us take a risk with a foreign manager or an up and coming manager with a name. I said ages before he went to Boro I’d like to have seen Carrick here.[/QUOTE]
Dean Smith of Norwich has just become available. Not that Tan would go for him, not taht he would come here anyway. I am sure his ambitions are far higher than City, having managed Villa and Norwich
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64017762
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Judging my their latest accounts they (Bristol) are certainly not a well run club.
Lansdown and Bristol sport keeping them with a whisker of a points deduction
They're losing a shed load of money just like most Championship clubs, it's true.
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr Soul '68
Dean Smith of Norwich has just become available. Not that Tan would go for him, not taht he would come here anyway. I am sure his ambitions are far higher than City, having managed Villa and Norwich
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64017762
Norwich have won just three of their last thirteen Championship matches :xmassherlock:
Re: Message to Tan and the board
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Bristol City. Not having a great season are they - level on points with City. Allegedly a well-run club with attentive, on- the-job owners, excellent young players, shorn of all their over-the-hill players to the likes of us, and play some decent attacking football. Perennial play-off hopefuls most seasons until November. Yes, it feels like a club neglected by dis-interested owners, but the 1st thing to address is hitting the back of the net - how Hudson or any other manager tackles that is anyone's guess...
Very wealthy owners too, just goes to show it doesn’t count for everything. We just need an owner who is committed, a decent CEO to run the club. At the moment we have neither and I think we are in last chance saloon with a very In experienced manager.
