Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
You'd do well to take that advice. :thumbup:
You don't have to "win" ever little interaction. Listen to what's being said and move on.
Try not to repeat yourself on too many more threads the rest of the month,every little helps.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
I was looking more for the people that could answer my question really.
You could answer it yourself if you weren’t so lazy. However, it’s crystal clear that you’re one of those people who prefers others to do all the work for them.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
You don't have to "win" ever little interaction. Listen to what's being said and move on.
Try not to repeat yourself on too many more threads the rest of the month,every little helps.
Nobody is winning are they.
I wanted a question answered. I've got you popping up telling me that it is the same as all the other threads.
I've got TLG giving tips on how to obtain accounts. I just wanted an answer.
The threads about the club and its predicament come back to Tan for one very good reason. He has employed anybody that has any influence at the club. He has paid the money and tightened the purse strings that dictate what those people can spend.
The situation the club is in is down to Tan and the board he picked.
People can blame the manager picked by Tan if they like.
They can blame the players picked by the transfer committee and manager picked by Tan if they like.
That's up to them.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Henry Hill
Bollocks
If anyone needs to give anyone a break it’s you and the OP repeating yourself daily. Boring pair of pricks. Probably the same person.
Get a life
Well'ard that innit, being a keyboard warrior and giving people verbal abuse on a messageboard. It seems to be you that needs to get a life, and some anger management classes while you're at it by the sounds of it :thumbup:
And don't lump me in with Lewj, I don't like what's going on at the club, but I don't spam the board with shit all day, I just offer my opinion. If you don't f*cking like it, then block me. Simples innit.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
You could answer it yourself if you weren’t so lazy. However, it’s crystal clear that you’re one of those people who prefers others to do all the work for them.
I could. Again, that is none of your business is it.
I'm not a fan of arsing about with spiders and see that as a waste of time too.
Again, I came here in the hope somebody might have an answer and it could be discussed. Not possible with people like yourself.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
Nobody is winning are they.
I wanted a question answered. I've got you popping up telling me that it is the same as all the other threads.
I've got TLG giving tips on how to obtain accounts. I just wanted an answer.
The threads about the club and its predicament come back to Tan for one very good reason. He has employed anybody that has any influence at the club. He has paid the money and tightened the purse strings that dictate what those people can spend.
The situation the club is in is down to Tan and the board he picked.
People can blame the manager picked by Tan if they like.
They can blame the players picked by the transfer committee and manager picked by Tan if they like.
That's up to them.
We know.
You've said.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
We know.
You've said.
And yet have posted a fair bit less than you. :thumbup:
We can all agree, I think, that posting on here isn't the greatest use of time. It won't change much and is all a bit pointless really.
So regardless of the content a few here have wasted a fair bit more time on here than me. Including you.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
And yet have posted a fair bit less than you. :thumbup:
We can all agree, I think, that posting on here isn't the greatest use of time. It won't change much and is all a bit pointless really.
So regardless of the content a few here have wasted a fair bit more time on here than me. Including you.
You love the post count argument.
I think I average 6 a day. Probably takes up 6 minutes of my day to read and reply.
I'm not really sure what you're getting at with it tbh.
I have a lot of posts, but I don't drone on and on squeezing the life out of threads saying the same thing over :thumbup:
Everyone knows your stance on Tan etc. You don't have to tell us 28 times on 4 different threads 7 days a week.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
You love the post count argument.
I think I average 6 a day. Probably takes up 6 minutes of my day to read and reply.
I'm not really sure what you're getting at with it tbh.
I have a lot of posts, but I don't drone on and on squeezing the life out of threads saying the same thing over :thumbup:
Everyone knows your stance on Tan etc. You don't have to tell us 28 times on 4 different threads 7 days a week.
The post count argument is fitting when people pop up here telling me that posting anything here is basically a waste of time and that I'm wasting my time and should use it better but fail to note that they post a lot more.
Post what you like, I'll post what I like and if people are annoying or bore you then put them on ignore. It isn't hard
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
And yet have posted a fair bit less than you. :thumbup:
Lew, just a bit of friendly advice from someone who actually agrees with your thoughts and comments in general.
It's like, I happen to really enjoy a pint and l always look forward to drinking a few. However, as much as I enjoy them too many make me feel sick. You can have too much of anything.
I think you're already in the overkill zone. Sometimes less is more.
No offence intended, just hoping you read the runes of some of the contributors here, some of whom have responded civilly while unfortunately others haven't.
I will still look forward to reading your contributions but maybe less frequently would be good 👍
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dorcus
Lew, just a bit of friendly advice from someone who actually agrees with your thoughts and comments in general.
It's like, I happen to really enjoy a pint and l always look forward to drinking a few. However, as much as I enjoy them too many make me feel sick. You can have too much of anything.
I think you're already in the overkill zone. Sometimes less is more.
No offence intended, just hoping you read the runes of some of the contributors here, some of whom have responded civilly while unfortunately others haven't.
I will still look forward to reading your contributions but maybe less frequently would be good ��
I understand exactly where you're coming from.
This thread was intended to actually discover something.
It was set out to try to see exactly where we are financially month to month in comparison to where the club was.
Usual suspects pop up just having a dig without adding to it and it descends into arguing again. I more than play my part in that.
You are right though. Posting less is probably for the best.
This thread is as good an example as I can give that starting threads looking for an actual answer doesn't work.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
I understand exactly where you're coming from.
This thread was intended to actually discover something.
It was set out to try to see exactly where we are financially month to month in comparison to where the club was.
Usual suspects pop up just having a dig without adding to it and it descends into arguing again. I more than play my part in that.
You are right though. Posting less is probably for the best.
This thread is as good an example as I can give that starting threads looking for an actual answer doesn't work.
👍
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
I understand exactly where you're coming from.
This thread was intended to actually discover something.
It was set out to try to see exactly where we are financially month to month in comparison to where the club was.
Usual suspects pop up just having a dig without adding to it and it descends into arguing again. I more than play my part in that.
You are right though. Posting less is probably for the best.
This thread is as good an example as I can give that starting threads looking for an actual answer doesn't work.
I offered advice.
Tlg told you where to find the info.
Dorcus has said what I've said but nicer.
Stop playing the victim mate, you know full well what you're doing on these threads "the usuals casue arguments"
Read it back. Tlg literally tells you where to find the answers, you choose not to listen..
I've told you you repeat yourself, because you do.
Like said above, less is more,why not listen and stop super spamming multiple threads with the same posts, yes people can put you on ignore but you can still be quoted...so your still visible..why not make a conscious effort to stop repeating yourself instead of multiple people putting you on ignore..
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Mad that people will be in town today paying 100 quid for an hour and a half’s entertainment when threads like these are free of charge :hehe:
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
I offered advice.
Tlg told you where to find the info.
Dorcus has said what I've said but nicer.
Stop playing the victim mate, you know full well what you're doing on these threads "the usuals casue arguments"
Read it back. Tlg literally tells you where to find the answers, you choose not to listen..
I've told you you repeat yourself, because you do.
Like said above, less is more,why not listen and stop super spamming multiple threads with the same posts, yes people can put you on ignore but you can still be quoted...so your still visible..why not make a conscious effort to stop repeating yourself instead of multiple people putting you on ignore..
Not playing the victim in the slightest.
I started a thread asking a question that nobody seems to know the answer to. That's about it really.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
If the intention was to show how much worse we are now than then the OP hasn't taken into account the fact that footballers prices and wages have exploded to such an extent that no realistic comparison can be made. It's apples and oranges.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vindec
If the intention was to show how much worse we are now than then the OP hasn't taken into account the fact that footballers prices and wages have exploded to such an extent that no realistic comparison can be made. It's apples and oranges.
It was the intention to find out.
Maybe discuss it after that. I'm not sure we can cut wages any more than we already have in my opinion. Certainly not in the Championship.
The intention was that. Nothing less, nothing more.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
Not playing the victim in the slightest.
I started a thread asking a question that nobody seems to know the answer to. That's about it really.
You were directed to an answer.
You ignored it and argued.
Nothing more nothing less.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
You were directed to an answer.
You ignored it and argued.
Nothing more nothing less.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
:facepalm:
Re: How much were we losing per month prior to and after Tan arrived?
I think when Sam Hammam took over we were £3m in debt
Here are the the accounts
https://find-and-update.company-info...history?page=7
