Middleweight and below I think that's a fair call
But some of the heavyweights are porkers
Printable View
That’s a fair enough point.
Their sacrifices, fitness, talent, drive and consistency is something to behold.
It’s obviously very grueling as well and to come back when you are losing takes incredible fortitude.
Boxing to me though is for want of a better word… romantic.
With the exception of scheduling (for those lucky enough to be considered as established fighters), boxing has all of the above with the added gladiatorial aspect.
“One tournament ends, and they’re off to another” That sentence alone proves to me that boxing is more challenging. If a boxer loses a world title fight, he may never get another chance. Tennis players can suffer lots of defeats, and still come back time after time to challenge for other titles.
A boxers training camp leading up to an important fight, can be 3months of testing, gruelling , exercising, running, bag work and sparring. To fight for a possible 36 minutes, with a 1 min break between every 3 mins, you have to be one of the fittest athletes in sport.
I do admire top class tennis players, but a boxer wins it for me any day of the week.
I don't think there is a right answer. I would make a case for cyclists though. This year's Tour de France is a case in point. At its head two fantastically well matched athletes way above anyone in the field trying (with team-mates) to grind each other down to attrition. The psychology and the physical attrition is like watching marathon runners playing chess.