Sidney was toast as soon as she called Biden the President.
Printable View
Sidney was toast as soon as she called Biden the President.
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5...resident-elect
Probably explains why ihateglue.....sorry I meant ihatealiens was getting so worked up about Biden's title on social media a week or so ago
More likely to be this.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
https://www.newsweek.com/sidney-powe...mpaign-1549386
Her lunacy was also casting doubt on the integrity of the vote in the special election to represent the Republicans in the Senate election. The winner of that is one of two candidates in a run-off election. If both lose the Republicans lose control of the Senate.
Looks like even Trump's gang couldn't let this madness continue if it risked polluting the run-off
https://thehill.com/homenews/527238-...something-fast
One by one they take a few steps backwards
A minor setback for Trump's team in the courts. Not only have they racked up 35 defeats, but one of them was a victory that has now been reversed!
P36 W1 D0 L35
It's a long way back, but let's believe in the rule of law, wait for it all to play out, trust the plan, etc
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-55052640
Trump accepts transition to Biden must begin
Quote:
Donald Trump has accepted a formal US transition should begin for President-elect Joe Biden to take office.
The president said the federal agency overseeing the handover must "do what needs to be done", even as he vowed to keep contesting his election defeat.
The General Services Administration (GSA) said it was acknowledging Mr Biden as the "apparent winner".
It came as Mr Biden's victory in the state of Michigan was officially certified, a major blow to Mr Trump.
The Biden team welcomed the start of the transition process.
"Today's decision is a needed step to begin tackling the challenges facing our nation, including getting the pandemic under control and our economy back on track," said its statement.
"This final decision is a definitive administrative action to formally begin the transition process with federal agencies."
What did Trump say?
Mr Trump tweeted as the GSA, which is tasked with formally beginning presidential transitions, informed the Biden camp that it would start the process.
Administrator Emily Murphy said she was making $6.3m (£4.7m) in funds available to the president-elect.
While pledging to keep up the "good fight", the president said: "Nevertheless, in the best interest of our Country, I am recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols, and have told my team to do the same."
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...61209.html?amp
Are we still talking about Hunter Biden's laptop?
maybe so bob but why did she persist in filing a lawsuit in Michigan challenging the result yesterday ?Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
can be found here as I ,m told twitter as deleted it on there platform
https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-...11.25.2020.pdf
I did mention on here jokingly about watermark gate as it was being reported at the time but never crossed over into the main stream media but on page 35 at the bottom it has been mentioned about the greying of watermarks found on some . surely if there was wide spread fake ballot forms surely an audit could pick this out putting it through a proper machine again ??
Back in the game Mozz...good for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
You just need to follow Sidney's logic.
The software designed to keep a dead Venezuelan in power was bought in undue haste by a Republican Governor to fix the Georgia election.
But obviously if the software secretly switched lots of votes from Trump to Biden, the hand count of those votes would show the fraud.
Unless of course there was a burst water pipe, the building was cleared and the "old switcheroo" kicked in and loads of the actual paper votes were put in the Biden pile to tally with the software switch.
Where the watermarks bit fits in on a hand-count is anyone's guess.
Anyway. The Trump campaign is obviously not happy with Sidney's explanation as they have requested a full automated recount of the automated recount that was hand recounted!
Glad to see your MAGA mates haven't thrown in the towel though.
Are the credulous still sending their life savings to Trump, Giuliani and the rest of the syndicate in the belief they are funding lawsuits to expose election fraud? This is the most cynical fundraising con yet. Very sad.
No point in recounting existing voting ballots is there ?
to me you should audit the ballot votes for signatures and addresses etc but then again reading between the lines ballots have disappeared into thin air in some states !
anyway onto pennsylvania the judge blocks certification
https://davidharrisjr.com/steven/jud...ction-results/
things are hotting up just reading some woman has been arrested for voter fraud in Wisconsin for voting for a dead person !!
The Pennsylvania one is halted until tomorrow. There's no precedent for what the judge has done and I'll be shocked if it hasn't been rectified by the end of Friday.Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
As for things "hotting up"... You'll have to explain why.
If you think a woman in Wisconsin being arrested for voter fraud where the system is obviously working as her vote wasn't counted and...well, she was caught , is proving something else, then please spell it out for us.
For things to go the way you think/hope they are then you would literally need to see them find evidence of hundreds of thousands to potentially millions of counts of voter fraud. Not dozens.
Why do you think Trump hasn't gone after any of the states that Biden was declared to win early? Was there no widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire, Washington state, Oregon etc, just in the states that were called later due to the way that the counting procedures were run?
It's all very exciting for people who desperately want there to be something underhand going on and there is some big conspiracy that Biden stole the election. When, in fact, it's simply that Trump lost the election because of his response to Covid and the BLM stuff. If he had managed either one of those national crises well (or even just slightly better than he did and not sow discourse throughout the states) then he more than likely would have won.
One final thing before I go to bed.
Can you qnswer this question, please... Why do you think the Democrats would need to allow people to fraudulently use their votes (dead people, different signatures, voting twice, voting later than was legally approved by the courts etc), destroy Trump ballots and make some disappear in places that they would be more likely to get caught, block spotters in counting rooms etc... Ultimately, leaving a lot more room to make mistakes and leave traces of evidence of wrongdoing, if they had the power to switch Trump votes to Biden using Dominion software?
Oh mozzer....Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
Trump is now at 38 defeats and 1 victory. He's turfed Sidney Powell out of his team.
And you're saying "why did she persist in filing a lawsuit in Michigan challenging the result yesterday ?"
She's doing it because someone is paying her, not because she thinks she's going to win!
Smell the coffee :hehe:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1762554.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
Thought you may enjoy this one, Jon.
not s happy man is he :hehe:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg1J9k4tyAI
How can such a dumb ass be in a financial position where he can happily give away millions? What have I done wrong with my life? :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Annoying, isn't it?! :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Mozzy, mate... See my above post. It's 100% unlikely to resonate with you because you seem to have strayed too far from the light with the election fraud stuff, but please read it and consider my points.Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
The scattergun approach to accusations and lawsuits brought on by Trump (still without any evidence after almost 3 weeks of declaring that there was widespread voter fraud) should make you wonder what possible reason they could have for not showing their cards and putting this all to bed now, right?
They haven't got time for playing poker with their supposed evidence as Biden is going be inaugurated in a couple of months and the transition of power has already begun!
C'mon, man! This new look doesn't suit you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
:hehe:
Nothing can stop what's coming 😜 you guardian reading leftist fools😛
I know January 20th. It's even got a date for a change!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogersblue
Trump will still be president 👍Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Nurse... nurse... !Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogersblue
This might explain certain behaviours given the advocacy of the miracle cureQuote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
https://www.politico.eu/article/drug...ders-says-ema/
you will be pleased to know that his legal has lost an appeal today to overturn the decision in pennsylvannia . I think this has been designed by trumps legal team as it will go to the supreme court even quickerQuote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
as for evidence check the 104 page lawsuit above by sidney powell in terms of bad practice at polling stations . talking of her just saw some footage of her claiming her legal team has now got pics and footage of ballot harvesting and evidence of more than 10 million illegal votes . No doubt this will be used in the supreme court as evidence
maybe it's all b@@llocks who knows but lots of mileage in this election for sure get the pop corn out :hehe:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...court-showdown
Mozz,Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
I fear I can't help but there might be bits of clarity in the following:
The Pennsylvania lawsuit that Guiliani presented was first considered by a judge who was considered a right wing Republican. He ripped it to shreds. Trump's gang appealed. Three Republican judges, the lead of which was appointed by Trump shredded it even further.
Trump's lawyers supposedly cheer because the strategy of presenting a shit case to the lower court, which was the same shit case that went to the appeal court can now be the shit case that goes to the Supreme Court. At which point it will be the first time it is considered by any judge appointed by a Democrat President. Obviously the swivel eyed mob expect the new make up of the Supreme Court to forget their oath to the constitution and overturn the Pennsylvania election.
The lead judge said "“Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,” Remember that Mozz.
As for Sidney in Georgia and Michigan... completely different case. She may look she's away with the fairies but those fairies are funded by lots of people like your mates in the States who believe this shit and are happy to fill Sidney's bank account up to and beyond the point she is laughed out of court.
i agree voters choose the president
trump lost and has the right to challenge this using the powers that's presented to him
over to wisconsin now think this whole process is going to supreme court too infact all of the swing states will me thinks
https://thegreggjarrett.com/emergenc...-160000-votes/
if the supreme courts kick all the evidence into touch in all swing states do you think this sideny powell will be taken to court herself for false evidence ?
Ever thought what username you might fancy when this is all over Mozz?Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
Just going to bump this.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Any of yours you fancy following up on, mozzer? How did the FBI sting in Serbia go? :hehe:
You know that new evidence can't be introduced to the supreme court via appeals, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
MOZZER2 will suit me fine
i would hate to be 1 of those multi user names :hehe:
exactly why powell and the trump team split . shes got her fingers on the pulse with dominion whilst his team did the donkey work with voting discrepanciesQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
they were going nowhere fast !
This makes no sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
You said that they were losing cases quickly (P39 W1 L38) to get to the supreme court quicker, but they're losing because the cases have very little, or usually no, evidence. They would be taking the exact same cases there.
There was a time when it looked like Trump had his new judge on the supreme court ready to make a decisive ruling in his favour, but those days are gone. It cannot happen now. I know you won't take my word for it, but it's the truth.
agree but having been introduced to american politics maybe from this thread for the first time ever this time around i find the whole thing captivating
to me trump has been shafted big time what i,m seeing on the ground obviously from what i,m seeing and reading from the states
if he dosen't turn it around this time he will contest it until he dies .
as for this powell lady now she s a strange one . when you listen to her she sounds so convincing with her so called evidence . surely if she presents her evidence to a court and it get kicks out she will go prison her self
heres a clip of her in action with her big mouth
https://mikepuree.com/wp/2020/11/25/...eorgia-coming/
They don't introduce the evidence to court though, that's the point! They tell everyone about it beforehand to raise funds, but when they're actually IN COURT they not only don't show evidence but they (and I mean from Guiliani down) say "we are not alleging fraud".Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
That's because lying to the public has no consequences but can be lucrative, but lying in court has serious consequences. So they don't do it.
This has happened over 30 times in a few weeks. Judges are saying things like "this case has absolutely no merit" * and you are STILL falling for it every time there's a new one!
* https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/11/27/...tion-case.html
(Also LOL @ the 'from what I'm seeing on the ground' line :hehe:
The big worry is how many fires trump will light between now and his departure, there's some big warships in the Persian gulf , another assassination in Iran .
There's also the lin wood case as well 🤔
Meanwhile in Milwaukee county Wisconsin at a cost of $3 million dollars the Trump funded hand recount resulted in a net gain to Biden of 132 votes :hehe:
I think it's all part of the master plan though because that's the stage we're at now with those who see plots, cover ups and corruption around every corner, but cannot recognise it when it's right in front of their eyes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Packerman
Gluey, who it seems has more or less accepted the inevitable and looks to be playing for laughs now, was more convincing at making out that multiple setbacks were actually part of a bigger plan which would become clear to the rest of us shortly (it never did) than those on here who are still fighting the bad fight, but it was always telling that no one ever knew what the big plan was until after something they had been relying on previously had failed spectacularly.
Finally, say we do end up in a situation where Trump does manage to remain President because the Supreme Court (including an inbuilt Republican majority) overturns a verdict of the voters which sees Biden winning the Electoral College by the same margin that Trump did in 2016 and securing over 6 million more votes than his opponent, are these Trump apologists expecting everyone to just go about their business as if nothing happened? We're getting close to a month since the vote and I see nothing yet to justify all of the claims of an electoral fix.