-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
I heard that Comey dumped her as she was a very Steep Date:sherlock:
Also something to do with not liking women... I kept hearing people say "Buttery Males".
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
I can think of a very high profile Democrat who was investigated by the FBI in a very high profile way... it wasn't that long ago. You may have heard about it. The Democrat's name rhymes with Shmillary Vlinton.
Oh yeah I remember more of an examination than an investigation with no prosecution , swept well under the carpet .
"" containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails not marked classified were retroactively classified by the State Department.
Some experts, officials, and members of*Congress*contended that Clinton's use of a private*messaging system*and a private server violated federal law,*""
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Oh yeah I remember more of an examination than an investigation with no prosecution , swept well under the carpet .
"" containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails not marked classified were retroactively classified by the State Department.
Some experts, officials, and members of*Congress*contended that Clinton's use of a private*messaging system*and a private server violated federal law,*""
Where are you getting the term "examination" from? Is it from the source you've quoted? I've just Googled your quotes at the bottom (since you never put the source in your posts) and found this:
"During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton drew controversy by using a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts keeps on secure federal servers. An FBI examination of Clinton's server found over 100 emails containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" as well as 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails not marked classified were retroactively classified by a State Department.
Some experts, officials, together with members of Congress contended that Clinton's ownership of the private messaging system moreover to a private server violated federal law"
You can't investigate a server, you moron. The examination of her server was part of the FBI investigation.
If someone handed the police a bloodied knife - would they examine that single piece of evidence or investigate it? It's a 50-50, so good luck.
Ultimately... You contended that the FBI don't investigate Democrats.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system
You were wrong. Own it.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
Where are you getting the term "examination" from? Is it from the source you've quoted? I've just Googled your quotes at the bottom (since you never put the source in your posts) and found this:
"During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton drew controversy by using a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts keeps on secure federal servers. An FBI examination of Clinton's server found over 100 emails containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" as well as 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails not marked classified were retroactively classified by a State Department.
Some experts, officials, together with members of Congress contended that Clinton's ownership of the private messaging system moreover to a private server violated federal law"
You can't investigate a server, you moron. The examination of her server was part of the FBI investigation.
If someone handed the police a bloodied knife - would they examine that single piece of evidence or investigate it? It's a 50-50, so good luck.
Ultimately... You contended that the FBI don't investigate Democrats. You were wrong. Own it.
Donald Trump has been President of the United States for over 3 1/2 years. In that time anyone calling out his eccentricities, racism, narcissism and naked self interest has been called out by the free thinkers and the "I wish I was a free thinker like the free thinkers" like LoM as part of some TDS sect.
Yet they are busily obsessed with the behaviour of a Secretary of State and failed Presidential candidate who left office 3 1/2 years ago and still HDSing without the slightest whiff of irony
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Donald Trump has been President of the United States for over 3 1/2 years. In that time anyone calling out his eccentricities, racism, narcissism and naked self interest has been called out by the free thinkers and the "I wish I was a free thinker like the free thinkers" like LoM as part of some TDS sect.
Yet they are busily obsessed with the behaviour of a Secretary of State and failed Presidential candidate who left office 3 1/2 years ago and still HDSing without the slightest whiff of irony
:hehe::hehe::hehe:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
Perhaps she refused his advances and that's why they fell out
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Oh yeah I remember more of an examination than an investigation with no prosecution , swept well under the carpet .
"" containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails not marked classified were retroactively classified by the State Department.
Some experts, officials, and members of*Congress*contended that Clinton's use of a private*messaging system*and a private server violated federal law,*""
You know, there is one simple explanation for why so many of Trump's team have been prosecuted and convicted, and so few democrats.
And it doesn't need a group of Hollywood script writers to come up with it.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
Where are you getting the term "examination" from? Is it from the source you've quoted? I've just Googled your quotes at the bottom (since you never put the source in your posts) and found this:
"During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton drew controversy by using a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts keeps on secure federal servers.
An FBI examination of Clinton's server found over 100 emails containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" as well as 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails not marked classified were retroactively classified by a State Department.
Some experts, officials, together with members of Congress contended that Clinton's ownership of the private messaging system moreover to a private server violated federal law"
You can't investigate a server, you moron. The
examination of her server was part of the FBI
investigation.
If someone handed the police a bloodied knife - would they
examine that single piece of evidence or
investigate it? It's a 50-50, so good luck.
Ultimately... You contended that the FBI don't investigate Democrats.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system
You were wrong. Own it.
The problem for LOM is that he constantly says that the democrats are just as bad as Trump. So when there is no evidence to show this is true, the only answer is to make it up or mislead.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Funny how they all seem to end up like this.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How it started: How it's going: <a href="https://t.co/Z0sova775f">pic.twitter.com/Z0sova775f</a></p>— Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) <a href="https://twitter.com/ditzkoff/status/1316146690773209091?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 13, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Funny how they all seem to end up like this.
<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" class="" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 476px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;" title="Twitter Tweet" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1 316146690773209091&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fww w.ccmb.co.uk%2Fnewreply.php%3Fdo%3Dnewreply%26p%3D 5125677&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A16015 88405575&width=550px" data-tweet-id="1316146690773209091"></iframe>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Acting US Attorney Gregg Sofer will pick up ‘unmasking’ probe: report
https://nypost.com/2020/10/06/acting-us-attorney-gregg-sofer-to-pick-up-unmasking-probe-report/<iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.96fd96193cc66c3e11d4c5e4c7c7ec97.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.96fd96193cc66c3e11d4c5e4c7c7ec97.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.96fd96193cc66c3e11d4c5e4c7c7ec97.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe"></iframe>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Funny how they all seem to end up like this.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How it started: How it's going: <a href="https://t.co/Z0sova775f">pic.twitter.com/Z0sova775f</a></p>— Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) <a href="https://twitter.com/ditzkoff/status/1316146690773209091?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 13, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Here is the Hill's report stating that Bash put a nice bow around his adonyne report and dropped it into Barr's lap before buggering off to the private sector as quickly as he could. Still we all know that conspiracies don't die they morph.
According to the Post, Bash and his team reviewed unmasking practices as well as whether officials at the time improperly leaked information to reporters. Bash reportedly turned over his findings to Barr, whose office chose not to publicly release them. The findings did not rise to the allegations Trump and his allies have made about wrongdoing, according to the report.
Bash announced that he would be leaving the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Oct. 5 without making any mention of the unmasking probe, but the Post reported that the move came after he had concluded his investigation. No criminal charges were made, and a report of his findings will not be released publicly.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-...ive-wrongdoing
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Chomsky was essential reading regarding the news media, but he now seems to have succumbed to the same fake news he was warning everybody about!
You mean he was right when you agreed with him, but now you don't he's wrong?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
You mean he was right when you agreed with him, but now you don't he's wrong?
Not at all, Chomsky was fundamental in changing the way I view the media. I saw through all the anti-Trump media rhetoric, so I was wondering why Chomsky allowed himself to be influenced by all the fake news, or maybe it was just a simple political decision to run with it?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Not at all, Chomsky was fundamental in changing the way I view the media. I saw through all the anti-Trump media rhetoric, so I was wondering why Chomsky allowed himself to be influenced by all the fake news, or maybe it was just a simple political decision to run with it?
:hehe:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Rudy Giuliani has been quiet lately.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
We will end surprise medical building! You know the surprise medical building is a disaster.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"Surprise medical building" <a href="https://t.co/Igp1wYWbAi">pic.twitter.com/Igp1wYWbAi</a></p>— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1316543356424593409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
It's all gone quiet in here.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Rudy Giuliani has been quiet lately.
He's on a laptop search
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/...firmation-vote
Not sure if anyone has watched her , no one can land a punch , if she gets on think Republicans will take that instead of another 4 years of Trump many in the party hate him, as its a very powerful decision making body
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
People under 40 yrs old have no clue, but @RudyGiuliani single handily took down the largest organized crime syndicate in America - the Mafia. Exposing the #BidenCrimeFamily is peanuts for Rudy.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Not at all, Chomsky was fundamental in changing the way I view the media. I saw through all the anti-Trump media rhetoric, so I was wondering why Chomsky allowed himself to be influenced by all the fake news, or maybe it was just a simple political decision to run with it?
The laptop will reopen very soon
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
The laptop will reopen very soon
Oooh... Will it be an examination or an investigation?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
The problem for LOM is that he constantly says that the democrats are just as bad as Trump. So when there is no evidence to show this is true, the only answer is to make it up or mislead.
not my fault you can't Google search .
For those who can google just go to the search bar simply type in ' corruption Democrats' have fun ,lots to read, take your own view don't have to take a side just have an open mind .
It's an easy one America is a very corrupt political country , its not just a Trump, he's just a loop that has rattled them.
Democrats are cleverly masqueraded as the goodies, backed by a very supportive media , again you can Google that.
I find it very amusing that the socialist on this board have any interest in the Democrats, they are only a right sided version of the Tory Party or Labours Blair, and soon to be Kiers politics .
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
Oooh... Will it be an examination or an investigation?
.
Revelation, keep up .
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
We will end surprise medical building! You know the surprise medical building is a disaster.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"Surprise medical building" <a href="https://t.co/Igp1wYWbAi">pic.twitter.com/Igp1wYWbAi</a></p>— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1316543356424593409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 15, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
why are so many of the crowd called MAGA