I'm sure we're the only team he ever does well against aswell. He looks like his grandad when he plays against us.
Printable View
260 to win. Game on! Come on Glammy
We did get him out pretty quickly this morning, and he was a tad cross with himself https://twitter.com/GlamCricket/stat...96151683305838
A big innings in the season going on here. Have they got the application?
Ingram gone unfortunately, need big innings from northeast and Carlson here
37/4. It's the hope that kills you.
Today’s effort will be later described as ‘disappointing’ by whoever is wheeled out for a reaction.
this is a pretty poor display from alleged professional sportsman. commentators are a right miserable lot
102/5, Cooke and Root, definitely doable, b100dy hate defeatists
Cooke looking good, got what looked like a questionable decision to me. Looked outside the line for lbw, and seemed to miss the bat. Bit of an either or appeal and the umpire gave it
And now it's over
dodgy umpire
Kellaway gone. 7 down. The end is nigh.
Dismal effort, not been following country cricket as much in recent years but has the Worcester wicket been problematic recently? Used to have a good track there
not really just poor batting, rolled over and given up
Just when you think the game of cricket can't make itself any more ridiculous. The spectacle of the Worcestershire morons running around and bowling part time spinners with 9 down, just to get on track with over rate. I'd fine them for bringing the game into disrepute if it was up to me. Absolutely pathetic
It’s been a pitch where it tends to be very hard to bat on the first morning, but, unlike Cardiff which can be similar before flattening out, Worcester’s pitch is a results one. If Worcestershire go up, they will have been helped by playing on a wicket which helps the bowler a lot more than the likes of Cardiff, Bristol and Derby. It looks like we let them score a hundred more than they should have on the first day.
dunno which team is more depressing to watch, Glammy or City?