-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jursset_BrisCity
Watch for another match where Cardiff have about 30% possession and the ball is in play for about 70% of the game.
Warnock should be put away for the brand of football he serves up at club after club. Cardiff being the latest in a long line of minimal possession anti football thuggery.
At least Forest will likely try to play football.
How many points do you get for trying to play football? (Whatever that means) The object of the game is to get ball in the other team's net more times than they can get it in yours. You can't do that by passing it around in your own half.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jursset_BrisCity
Possession
Barnsley 70%
Cardiff City 30%
“We probably won’t play in a match rest of this season where the ball is kept out of play by the opposition as much as that.
If you watched that tonight you wouldn’t know which side was 2nd and to be honest when we come up against teams that play like that, I’d like to think the referees will be a little bit stronger to cut it out.”
Paul Heckingbottom
"We'll be playing in the Europa Cup within 5 years."
Lee Johnson
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Another clean sheet. Another 3 points.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Keeping looking up Jursett :ayatollah:
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
We only had 31% possession again today.
Will we have to give the 2 goals back?
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
No sign of the Wurzel prankster today then?
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Treat the scarecrow to some new eyes so he can read the league table properly as well.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Fulham and Sheff weds are capable of going on a run..derby can leapfrog them by winning game in hand...and Boro aren't going to lie down. Bristol will be lucky to even make the play offs.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joecity
Treat the scarecrow to some new eyes so he can read the league table properly as well.
Best post to day:thumbup:
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
“Holding, time wasting, General all round thuggery. What more do you expect from a Warnock outfit.
What a horrible side Cardiff are”
31% possession again.
Shall we add Forest to the list as well?
Do you not understand why you get none of the plaudits that Wolves do?
Can you not see the correlation as to why so many say this about Cardiff.....
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
We should be thankful for jurrsett for a number of reasons.
1. He provides continuous entertainment.
2. No matter how divided we can be, he is the one thing we always agree on ie he is a sad little man.
3. A reminder that whenever we feel a bit insecure or inadequate, there is always someone else who really is both of those things.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TH63
We should be thankful for jurrsett for a number of reasons.
1. He provides continuous entertainment.
2. No matter how divided we can be, he is the one thing we always agree on ie he is a sad little man.
3. A reminder that whenever we feel a bit insecure or inadequate, there is always someone else who really is both of those things.
Yes he is a wanekr of the highest order.:thumbup:
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Oh, and we have also seen that table that shows we play far fewer long balls than Bristol Hoof-city.
But jursett always ignores that
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jursset_BrisCity
“Holding, time wasting, General all round thuggery. What more do you expect from a Warnock outfit.
What a horrible side Cardiff are”
31% possession again.
Shall we add Forest to the list as well?
Do you not understand why you get none of the plaudits that Wolves do?
Can you not see the correlation as to why so many say this about Cardiff.....
Cant you see we dont give a ****? xx Another 3 points in the bag .
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
His latest post will no doubt get 50 more reactions. He gets what he comes on here for alright.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
His latest post will no doubt get 50 more reactions. He gets what he comes on here for alright.
Indeed.
We are all he’s got for company though.
It’s absolutely tragic when you think about it.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eric the Half a Bee
Attachment 1958
Sorry, you're the hoofball champions of the division. Are you ignoring me intentionally?
I wonder if the stats actually take account of whether the long ball is to a forward or winger?
When a keeper punts it upfield - is that considered to be a long ball?
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jimmy the Jock
We only had 31% possession again today.
Will we have to give the 2 goals back?
Up to the judges I suppose. When do we find out?
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Personally I don't mind it off of
Jursett. He is consistent. He loves it. Some like giving it back to him. Me n all. Bit of fun. Yes he's a nob. So am I sometimes. (Not as much as him).
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
Up to the judges I suppose. When do we find out?
Different sport, but Wales dominated possession and territory against the all blacks and were behind in the game on points. Any time NZ had the ball they were effective with it.....Cardiff are happy to concede posession as when they have the ball its used effectively.
Wales v New Zealand: All Blacks take chances at Principality Stadium - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/42126083
"So much of what Wales did on a clear-sky, chill-air night in Cardiff on Saturday was exactly as coach Warren Gatland would have wanted - an ambition in attack, a willingness to go wide, the ability to dominate possession and territory, and chances against the world champions.
So much but so little to show for it once again as New Zealand ran out 33-18 winners. History repeats itself in this contest not because no-one is listening but because it makes logical sense. The side that takes its chances wins. Ruthless beats romantic every time."
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
Different sport, but Wales dominated possession and territory against the all blacks and were behind in the game on points. Any time NZ had the ball they were effective with it.....Cardiff are happy to concede posession as when they have the ball its used effectively.
Wales v New Zealand: All Blacks take chances at Principality Stadium -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/42126083
"So much of what Wales did on a clear-sky, chill-air night in Cardiff on Saturday was exactly as coach Warren Gatland would have wanted - an ambition in attack, a willingness to go wide, the ability to dominate possession and territory, and chances against the world champions.
So much but so little to show for it once again as New Zealand ran out 33-18 winners. History repeats itself in this contest not because no-one is listening but because it makes logical sense. The side that takes its chances wins. Ruthless beats romantic every time."
So what you're saying is "he who dares wins, Jursett"?
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
Up to the judges I suppose. When do we find out?
After I am celebrity tonight.
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
So what you're saying is "he who dares wins, Jursett"?
Absolutely
-
Re: Tomfoolery from Jursett
Imagine how many points we'd have on the board if we had more possession.
I think it's quite sporting of us to give other teams a chance by letting them have the ball for a bit.
Sums up what a fair and sporting outfit we've become under Warnock.
Perhaps we can get into the Europa league via fair play?