Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid
Printable View
I used to view the message-board as I’ve told you, can I ask why you are so concerned about me when clearly there are hundreds if not thousands of new accounts on here, it seems odd that you are only concerned about me.
You can add me of Facebook if you want :hehe:
It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.
I just wonder if this is really worth posting. We had a pandemic, get over it, we move on. If it comes again we do the same, we protect the elderly sick and vulnerable: common sense, no big deal
If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.
What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.
See, I’m not even remotely interested in engaging with this because clearly it’s someone with strong views, albeit views I think are mental. Obviously we’ve heard all this sort of stuff continually and it goes into a rabbit hole where insanity lies.
The original post on the other hand just seemed so odd!
Presuming your reply was serious, just what was insane about what he wrote?
This is Fauci speaking in 1999 about the grave dangers of introducing a new vaccine too quickly.
https://youtu.be/MjVVw841eUo
I dont get paid to make those decisions however, I would have followed Sweden’s pathway if I wanted to please the majority of the population, and let the rest make their own risk assessment, knowing full well they would only suffer mild to moderate symptoms akin to many other coronaviruses
Let me guess, you're another one who was daft enough to place your faith in Pfizer, because - and I'm speculating here - you were far too busy to spare 10 minutes of your precious time researching that company's egregious business practices.
Here's but one example: Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing - https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justi...nt-its-history
In 1999 he was very aware how carefully a new vaccine must be introduced for its effects to be studied over a number of years. He abandoned that reasoning in 2020. Now he advocates giving it to those as young as six months old for an alleged disease that has contributed to the deaths of fewer than 1 per every thousand of the world's population in almost three years.
Let me guess. You trust Fauci in that 18 second clip. But not once over the past 2.5 years because he’s an agent of the Great Reset?
You believe your 10 minutes of research are worth more than the countless tens of thousands of top healthcare officials from countries all across the world that have both extensive and first hand experience in the development of the vaccine and have vouched for its effectiveness and safety.
Of course all of their knowledge is instantly inadmissible because the corporate marketing wing of Pfizer broke the law in 2005.
That’s like blaming Puma for the rebrand because they made the red kits.
Every fan of depopulation was extremely eager for people to volunteer for what they promoted was a life saving injection. Why would they - isn't that counter-intuitive? Shouldn't they have instead warned of the dangers of taking something that had no long-term safety data so that more would die to ease the strain on the earth's depleting resources that they also say they care so deeply about?
I was suspicious of the prevailing narrative because of what's above, and a great deal more so when it became plain that politicians in alliance with corporate media and health authorities were deliberately concealing the fact that the manufacturers of their 'safe and effective' products demanded, and were granted, complete immunity from court proceedings for any deaths or injuries which resulted from volunteering for a jab.
That strategy was so effective that I've still yet to speak to a volunteer who was aware Pfizer and co enjoyed total indemnity.
By doing so they were in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code which emphasises the protocol of informed consent, and they remain so because Moderna does as well for this latest shot in the UK.
Thanks for you thoughts. I know a professor of tropical diseases, a senior doctor who is heavily involved in things Covid, two retired GP's, a senior nurse who ran a Covid ward, a trainee nurse who have worked on Covid wards and another nurse who specialises in viruses - and none of them go along with the conspiracy theorists on here.
I know a binman a brickie a hooker and a bookie none of them has taken the #clotshot
each of them wanting to live to an age where they get to see their grandchildren.
For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest,
neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad
GOD Wins
Clandestine