-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Siopis looks like he’s running in treacle. Carrying a knock?
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Siopis skinned and nearly 2-3 - since the subs we have been decidedly second best.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maurice Swan
Hope someone asks EB that question....
It's not the first time he's made defensive changes looking to protect a lead and we've conceded.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PontBlue
Me either. We were well on top
Great mgt eh?
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Only one team looks like they might win this.....and it's not us....
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
We’ve seen this script two or three times this season already. Basic game management, make changes when things are not going well and leave things for 5-10 mins when they are.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Anyone else think it might be time to give Panzo a run in the team, give McGuinness a rest?
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Whole back line has looked like they can use a rest at times today, Goutas been solid as usual but Plymouth have got a lot of joy down the flanks and McGuinness has been shaky.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
I ask again..because I just don't understand...WHY change a team that is starting to dominate?? If we are 2 or 3 goals ahead ok....but not when just one ahead. I just do not buy this 'tiredness' excuse.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Subs cost us. Strange strange decision.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Maurice Swan
I ask again..because I just don't understand...WHY change a team that is starting to dominate?? If we are 2 or 3 goals ahead ok....but not when just one ahead. I just do not buy this 'tiredness' excuse.
The players he took off didn't look tired and I'd rather have seen this game out than save some energy for the Leicester game which we are highly unlikely to get anything from.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bluebirds17
Subs cost us. Strange strange decision.
Absolutley agree...why why why???
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
I suppose the only plus point is that Leicester are due to end their winning run.....
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Very frustrating, sub at the wrong tome in my opinion although I’m not sure they directly cost us the goal 2 minutes later.
We need to do better, players work hard but lacking massively in confidence, they don’t seem to want the ball.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Bit of a strange game that, Lucky to get a point but very nearly nicked it at the death, always going to be disappointing to concede when 2-1 up, but were very lucky to get back in it when 1-0 down, I don't think we are very difficult to play against, slow and ponderous about the back four, a quick press and we are incapable of working the ball out without losing it very quickly too many players playing with their heads down and not aware of opportunities around them trying the extra touch when the quick release would keep us on the front foot and going forward. Not too disappointed and the Blues stuffed the Dragons :xmasayatollah:.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sparticus_Mills
Anyone else think it might be time to give Panzo a run in the team, give McGuinness a rest?
Panzo is crap but I would have liked to see him come on for a few minutes today and switch to a back 3
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PontBlue
The players he took off didn't look tired and I'd rather have seen this game out than save some energy for the Leicester game which we are highly unlikely to get anything from.
Colwill was limping before he came off and looked knackered.
Best I’ve seen him play for a while. A few times he unnecessarily ran into crowds but he’s getting better
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Colwill was giving us all the momentum.
Additionally don't understand taking Etete off we had no one to aim for then when we continued to pump it up the pitch.
-
Re: FT: CARDIFF CITY 2 - 2 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Neither a good nor bad performance or result.
Interested to see what Bulut does Friday, as we should be targeting QPR for 3 points. Leicester will be hard enough as it is, I’d be happy for him to rest quite a few Friday and the fringe players a ‘prove yourself’ game.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Colwill...REALLY? is that what others see? Etete should NOT have been taken off...he was doing well.
I just saw WOL made Colwill MOM....were they at the game?
-
Re: FT: CARDIFF CITY 2 - 2 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Thanks Mr Bulut for surrendering the initiative.
-
Re: FT: CARDIFF CITY 2 - 2 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dave Blue
Thanks Mr Bulut for surrendering the initiative.
He can’t really duck this can he? Unless he was forced into the subs? If he wasn’t then he isn’t the one to lead us forward.
-
Re: CARDIFF CITY v PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LA Bluebird
Siopis looks like he’s running in treacle. Carrying a knock?
I think he’s been carrying the knock he took 3-4 games ago. Doesn’t seem to have really shaken it off. Bulut needs him in midfield so he plays
-
Re: FT: CARDIFF CITY 2 - 2 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goats
He can’t really duck this can he? Unless he was forced into the subs? If he wasn’t then he isn’t the one to lead us forward.
Has he got much to duck? The games come so thick and fast you have to rotate including during the game itself.
If anything this just shows how average we actually are which isn’t really his fault. The squad isn’t good enough and we need reinforcements to push on.
-
Re: FT: CARDIFF CITY 2 - 2 PLYMOUTH ARGYLE. Match thread
Thought Colwill was very good after half time - created at least 3 great chances, Ng took one off Ralls foot when you would have bet the captain to score and then played Collins in with a brilliant ball that wrongfooted the entire defense but was a shocking touch out of play.
Even in the first half looked by far the most likely to make something happen, just lacked a bit of end product. Only one of our players to ever show for the ball. Could argue him, Ralls or Grant for MoM but it’s not ridiculous.