I shit you not, snopes 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Printable View
The Politics Board is littered with threads like this. First you post or support something that another contributor is able to easily discredit. Your own self esteem won't allow you to admit to being wrong so you go into this endless loop of deflection or generalisation thinking that others will see that you were right all along. Never directly confronting the specific points that made you look silly in the first place.
Still, I'll play.
As the evidence-based guru you are will you now point to the supporting facts that
a) show that Pelosi, Kerry and Romney have children who work for Ukrainian gas companies and
b) Joe Biden stole $140 million from the Federal Treasury, transferred to Rosemont Seneca, purportedly for bank bailouts, then, to his personal account in the Caymans?
LOLOLOLOL
Still waiting for you or Gluey to provide evidence to the contrary.
It's well well and good using the "HAHAHA the source he used is one that we discredit as we don't like it... we prefer right wing bloggers, conspiracy theorists and f**king Q!" but you still haven't backed up a meme gluey found on twitter with any evidence, despite believing it to be true... also without any evidence.
All you have to do is post a link that shows any of the kids of Pelosi, Kerry or Romney have had worked at Ukrainian gas companies at any time in their lives. That's a get of jail free card for you both considering the crap you believe actually states that all of their kids are currently working for Ukrainian gas companies.
Snopes :hehe:
Hmm let me think. Was it me who started this specific thread with three OAN videos pivoting away from Trump Ukraine corruption followed by unsupportable memes and tweets. Given the outcome I could see why you might want to expunge this little venture. However, since you started a thread on the Biden's alleged Ukraine corruption and chucked in Romney, Kerry and Pelosi as well we may as well carry on in the vain hope that you may be able to salvage some dignity by finding a shred of evidence to support the statements I posted above!
The videos were interesting because they included interviews with former high ranking Ukrainian officials who had documentary evidence of alledged criminal activity, which is a lot more than Nancy had for her impeachment campaign. Either way, the truth is going to come out.
Let's go back to the start of this little vignette.
I said:
First you post or support something that another contributor is able to easily discredit. Your own self esteem won't allow you to admit to being wrong so you go into this endless loop of deflection or generalisation thinking that others will see that you were right all along. Never directly confronting the specific points that made you look silly in the first place.
Since the posts that were easy to discredit we have had:
Deflection
You seem to be turning the spotlight away from the Trump Ukraine corruption, is this another pivot?
which is a lot more than Nancy had for her impeachment campaign.
Generalisation
I'm still waiting for the specifics of who done what and when, as the corruption has generally been well hidden up until now.
The videos were interesting (the ones you said you hadn't watched when you posted them) because they included interviews with former high ranking Ukrainian officials who had documentary evidence of alledged criminal activity,
Confronting the specific points that made you look silly in the first place
Zip
Even when you were told beforehand that this was exactly what you would do you don't seem to have the self-awareness to stop you doing it!
You are currently losing 4-0, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it end 5-O or 6-0 when the full-time whistle is blown. It's probably a good idea for your team to change managers, after shipping so many goals on your watch against a part-time pub team!
Thanks for more meaningless bluster. Now about the evidence to support your assertions in this thread
or Imran Awan was guilty of more than fraud;
or Carter Page was UCE1;
or Seth Rich was murdered because he was involved in the Clinton e-mail server;
or Uranium One was going to collapse the Clintons like a house of cards;
or Pizzagate involved Clintons and others in child trafficking;
or Sandy Hook was a false flag;
or General Flynn is innocent and will never be prosecuted.
5 or 6-0 you say?
Pizzagate was Bill and Jeffrey flying around on aeroplanes compromising powerful people, and the goings on at the famous island and other places. The pizza restaurant was just a media distraction. Regarding Sandy Hook, I've only ever commented about the video testimony of the caretaker. Carter Page worked for the CIA. Everything else is dependent on cases actually being investigated, and is still a work in process. You obviously haven't read the report from the House sergeant at arms regarding Awan. You just fall for everything that you read in the compliant media. However, it does demonstrate how corrupt certain goverment agencies are, and without Trump none of it would be known.
A priceless repainting of years of bad calls unlikely to convince anyone other than its author that you got these right.
Still as you are on a roll why don't you give the Romney/Kerry/Pelosi kids all work for Ukraine gas companies and Joe Biden stole $140 million from the Federal Treasury, transferred to Rosemont Seneca, purportedly for bank bailouts, then, to his personal account in the Caymans a spin with your airbrushes.
It's a pretty good record considering you got the Steele Dossier, Trump Russia Collusion, Obstruction of Justice, and the Mueller Investigation 100% wrong, even after I continuously pointed out exactly why you were wrong. I'm afraid it's time to admit that you were duped by your favourite news media, and it's still happening!
I guess we can put to bed that the meme about Biden, Kerry, Pelosi and Romney's kids was fake then... And add the Biden funneling federal funds into his Cayman account bollocks into that category too.
Imagine not being able to back down on anything (even the slightest little thing) when you know you're wrong just because your ego won't let you. It's embarrassing and cringeworthy to witness.
Do you remember the time he posted an advert for actors as being proof that the violence around the Unite the Right rally was probably started by agent provocateurs from the left/Antifa.
Then someone pointed out that the actors were needed in Charlotte, North Carolina rather than Charlottesville, Virginia where the rally was being held and a counter demonstrator run over and killed. He spent about four pages dissembling and deflecting rather than admit this obvious mistake.
It is obviously cringeworthy to witness but I am not sure about the embarrassment factor. If you have no self-awareness that these things are as plain to everybody else as the nose on your face then you can carry on as normal with your super-ego intact.
All credit to those of you in this Politics forum who are still indulging a certain person on here who falsely attributes statements to other posters and whose ego obliterates any balanced debate by obfuscation, diversion and lack of any awareness when he is plainly wrong.
He's either a wind-up merchant or has very serious ego problems.
By the way, if he chooses to reply to this message it would be wasted on me as I have him on ignore.:hehe:
I don't remember that one - but of course he would do that. All credit to you for continuing to make him look like an idiot. I reached my breaking point when he was losing an argument and had to resort to calling me and TOBW rapist apologists instead of backing down or accepting that he'd got the facts wrong. He's a child, lashing out at anyone who doesn't agree with him.
Yes, the Charlottesville one was mine. All I did was read the link and it was clear it was a different place, but Gulley The Gullible stuck to his guns that they* were paying uber expenses for these actor/protestors to travel 100+miles instead of just finding local ones.
*Probably Soros
Thanks, just found it. I don't think I started looking at the politics board properly until after that. I could be wrong though.
What a complete shitshow those posts are. The Sandy Hook stuff he posted a page or two later is new to me too. What a lovely human being he is.
Haha, carry on with all your nonsense, cos you lot haven't got anything to say for yourselves, you can only talk about other people. You are like a bunch of old woman :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
I tried that quite a number of times and without any success. Not only did he fail to come up with any evidence whatsoever about a number of his statements (and despite endless requests to do so) he just kept repeating them and even embellishing them further - and he thinks that putting a smiley at the end of his fabricated arguments makes any difference. However, I am merely stating the obvious as you all know what he's like (with one or two exceptions perhaps).