The US Election Thread...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

Controlled opposition everywhere. :biggrin: It takes some practice to keep thinking with the dialectic in mind but you start to see things differently when you do, agenda 30 is one humongous Hegelian Dialectic :hehe:

---

Yeah, but on the other hand Trump could be the real deal and he's going to kick some ass :biggrin: I would like to think it was so, but I can't see how he would be let anywhere near the Whitehouse on a Republican ticket if he was just going to cause chaos for the establishment.

Anyone thinking that the security scare at the Trump rally was a manufactured? It fits in too neatly with with false "truther" card Trump is playing. His Trump card.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37886291

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Yeah, but on the other hand Trump could be the real deal and he's going to kick some ass :biggrin: I would like to think it was so, but I can't see how he would be let anywhere near the Whitehouse on a Republican ticket if he was just going to cause chaos for the establishment.

---

Order out of chaos, you know the drill :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blue in the Face

Anyone thinking that the security scare at the Trump rally was a manufactured? It fits in too neatly with with false "truther" card Trump is playing. His Trump card.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37886291

---

We were watching that last night, looks FAF :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

Order out of chaos, you know the drill :hehe:


We were watching that last night, looks FAF :hehe:

---

The individual was a Republican was only holding up a 'Republicans against Trump' poster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taunton Blue Genie

The individual was a Republican was only holding up a 'Republicans against Trump' poster.

---

Ahh, I didn't realize how much danger he was in, those paper cuts can really hurt. :hehe:

FBI email stuff never looked like keeping Clinton out of the oval office, in reality she was always way to far ahead of trump.
However it might make a crucial difference in determining control of the senate.
Before the email case reopened the democrats had some real momentum in that area and having a democrat president and a democrat senate she wouldn't have been as hampered as Obama has been.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...-forecast.html

The down tick in the predicted outcome chart coincides neatly with the reopening of the FBI investigation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taunton Blue Genie

The individual was a Republican was only holding up a 'Republicans against Trump' poster.

---

Somebody in the crowd shouted out that the Republican fella who was only holding up a 'Republicans against Trump' poster had a gun, so the secret service agents took the appropriate action.

I'm sure there is a job waiting for you at the BBC with the way you only tell half the story (only kidding old bean :biggrin:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Somebody in the crowd shouted out that the Republican fella who was only holding up a 'Republicans against Trump' poster had a gun, so the secret service agents took the appropriate action.

I'm sure there is a job waiting for you at the BBC with the way you only tell half the story (only kidding old bean :biggrin:)

---

I was referring merely to the protestor's action and not the reaction of someone in the crowd which prompted the Secret Service being involved.

More good news, a powerful coronal mass ejection (CME) is set to hit Earth tomorrow :hehe:
http://investmentwatchblog.com/coinc...ding-disaster/

@ Organ and Gluey, if the lights go out, see you in FEMA camp :wave: :hehe:

I feel I must inform you that I'm now in the same camp as Goslow, Doc, TruBlue and several others. I henceforth refuse to believe anything unless the info is found within the pages of the Sun or Daily Express.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I feel I must inform you that I'm now in the same camp as Goslow, Doc, TruBlue and several others. I henceforth refuse to believe anything unless the info is found within the pages of the Sun or Daily Express.

---

Comes to something when those papers have a better strike rate than you. :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I feel I must inform you that I'm now in the same camp as Goslow, Doc, TruBlue and several others. I henceforth refuse to believe anything unless the info is found within the pages of the Sun or Daily Express.

---

I think one of them sneaks in to my camp late at night :hehe:

I'll take a punt on that being the nightowl TruBlue. Can you confirm if he wears pantomime slippers, the type that curls upwards at the toes?

Off up the wooden hill now. Something massive and world-changing will happen today. Take note as I'm rarely wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I'll take a punt on that being the nightowl TruBlue. Can you confirm if he wears pantomime slippers, the type that curls upwards at the toes?

Off up the wooden hill now. Something massive and world-changing will happen today. Take note as I'm rarely wrong.

---

Even you can't get this one wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I'll take a punt on that being the nightowl TruBlue. Can you confirm if he wears pantomime slippers, the type that curls upwards at the toes?

Off up the wooden hill now. Something massive and world-changing will happen today. Take note as I'm rarely wrong.

---

:hehe: He's behind you!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TruBlue

Even you can't get this one wrong.

---

Therell be a new us president elected.

Unless something happens that means Obama has to stay on...which is another of organs predictions :hehe:

Looking like the shit sandwich is going to win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I feel I must inform you that I'm now in the same camp as Goslow, Doc, TruBlue and several others. I henceforth refuse to believe anything unless the info is found within the pages of the Sun or Daily Express.

---

Pretty pathetic way to discredit when you read back isn't it really? :-)

Turn out by hispanics is over 100% in florida. Some suggest a "landslide".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordKenwyne

Pretty pathetic way to discredit when you read back isn't it really? :-)

Turn out by hispanics is over 100% in florida. Some suggest a "landslide".

---

Yeah, I heard a rumour that the winner was already declared a year ago, so you may be onto something :thumbup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Yeah, I heard a rumour that the winner was already declared a year ago, so you may be onto something :thumbup:

---

Who won?!

Hey we are all winner winner chicken dinner in this one :-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vimana.

Who won?!

Hey we are all winner winner chicken dinner in this one :-)

---

Florida is huge, just like the man said :thumbup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Florida is huge, just like the man said :thumbup:

---

Florida vote skulduggery got Bush elected

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordKenwyne

Pretty pathetic way to discredit when you read back isn't it really? :-)

Turn out by hispanics is over 100% in florida. Some suggest a "landslide".

---

Did some of them vote twice?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

Did some of them vote twice?

---

It certainly looks that way.

Clinton's odds are generally 1-5, Trump is 4-1.

I think we can all agree that this has been a bizarre election. It seems an awful lot of people will vote according to who they hate the least.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Clinton's odds are generally 1-5, Trump is 4-1.

I think we can all agree that this has been a bizarre election. It seems an awful lot of people will vote according to who they hate the least.

---

I imagine there will be no scenes like with Obama.

Hundreds of thousands cheering on his inauguration.

Optimism everywhere.

Usually it is an exciting time, after the USA election. This'll just be depressing.

Last time I stayed up all night. I doubt I will today.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

Did some of them vote twice?

---

Last time there was a early turn out of around 300k. Now it is 800k.

Before the main day of voting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Clinton's odds are generally 1-5, Trump is 4-1.

I think we can all agree that this has been a bizarre election. It seems an awful lot of people will vote according to who they hate the least.

---

The various psyops have been fun to watch though, some real mind twisters going on.

Perhaps it's the type of sites I visit, but the comments at my regular haunts are 95% pro Trump. I ended up at the Huffington Post to read an article the other day. I'm used to reading slanted MSM stuff but that one was so absurdly biased that not even the BBC would publish it. There was, I think, 1,200 reader comments on it, and I spent 10 minutes scrolling through them before giving up on finding anyone who wasn't going to vote for Clinton.

Just like many constituencies in this country, a lot of states in the USA always vote the same way for ideological reasons regardless of the candidates' merits. I say ideological when it's really 'who'll give me the most free dosh.'

I'd say there's a 1% chance that Trump's a real alternative, so contrary to popular opinion it will make no difference who wins.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Perhaps it's the type of sites I visit, but the comments at my regular haunts are 95% pro Trump. I ended up at the Huffington Post to read an article the other day. I'm used to reading slanted MSM stuff but that one was so absurdly biased that not even the BBC would publish it. There was, I think, 1,200 reader comments on it, and I spent 10 minutes scrolling through them before giving up on finding anyone who wasn't going to vote for Clinton.

Just like many constituencies in this country, a lot of states in the USA always vote the same way for ideological reasons regardless of the candidates' merits. I say ideological when it's really 'who'll give me the most free dosh.'

I'd say there's a 1% chance that Trump's a real alternative, so contrary to popular opinion it will make no difference who wins.

---

I expect it's because the websites you go on are full of conspiracy kooks on them. Trump seems to be the king of the conspiracy at the moment so hence 95% of them voting for him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TruBlue

I expect it's because the websites you go on are full of conspiracy kooks on them. Trump seems to be the king of the conspiracy at the moment so hence 95% of them voting for him.

---

What conspiracies are these?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Perhaps it's the type of sites I visit, but the comments at my regular haunts are 95% pro Trump. I ended up at the Huffington Post to read an article the other day. I'm used to reading slanted MSM stuff but that one was so absurdly biased that not even the BBC would publish it. There was, I think, 1,200 reader comments on it, and I spent 10 minutes scrolling through them before giving up on finding anyone who wasn't going to vote for Clinton.

Just like many constituencies in this country, a lot of states in the USA always vote the same way for ideological reasons regardless of the candidates' merits. I say ideological when it's really 'who'll give me the most free dosh.'

I'd say there's a 1% chance that Trump's a real alternative, so contrary to popular opinion it will make no difference who wins.

---

Bloody hell, has it taken this long for the penny to drop?

This is why it's always been so ridiculous to hear you talk about the Alternative News. Just as the Guardian and the Mail have very different views in mainstream, you can find Alternative News sites from across the spectrum too. People think that their view is more widespread than it really is because their social media is full of what they want to hear. What you're experiencing is no different, as you found when you went to Huffington.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lardy

Bloody hell, has it taken this long for the penny to drop?

This is why it's always been so ridiculous to hear you talk about the Alternative News. Just as the Guardian and the Mail have very different views in mainstream, you can find Alternative News sites from across the spectrum too. People think that their view is more widespread than it really is because their social media is full of what they want to hear. What you're experiencing is no different, as you found when you went to Huffington.

---

No, that Huffington Post piece was pure propaganda. The comments must have been filtered for there not to have any dissenting voices. I'd link it here but I cleared months of internet history yesterday. Something else it had was incredible editor's notes at the end of the article just to hammer home how supposedly dangerous Trump was.

Here's an article they published yesterday which has the same editor's note at its end. Take a look then try and contend that it's anything other than ridiculous tosh. I've seen Huffington Post journalists interviewed on the BBC for their insights. Even TruBlue wouldn't describe this as objective. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0aac624863e02

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lardy

Bloody hell, has it taken this long for the penny to drop?

This is why it's always been so ridiculous to hear you talk about the Alternative News. Just as the Guardian and the Mail have very different views in mainstream, you can find Alternative News sites from across the spectrum too. People think that their view is more widespread than it really is because their social media is full of what they want to hear. What you're experiencing is no different, as you found when you went to Huffington.

---

Yes, you have to choose your media carefully :biggrin:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqCIub3SmCI

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

No, that Huffington Post piece was pure propaganda. The comments must have been filtered for there not to have any dissenting voices. I'd link it here but I cleared months of internet history yesterday. Something else it had was incredible editor's notes at the end of the article just to hammer home how supposedly dangerous Trump was.

Here's an article they published yesterday which has the same editor's note at its end. Take a look then try and contend that it's anything other than ridiculous tosh. I've seen Huffington Post journalists interviewed on the BBC for their insights. Even TruBlue wouldn't describe this as objective. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0aac624863e02

---

But your sites are 95% pro Trump?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lardy

But your sites are 95% pro Trump?

---

Yes, the sites I visit the comments are 95% pro Trump.

Anyway, are you not going to dispute that that corporate media article I linked is hysterically one-sided and has next to no credibility?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Yes, the sites I visit the comments are 95% pro Trump.

Anyway, are you not going to dispute that that corporate media article I linked is hysterically one-sided and has next to no credibility?

---

I haven't read the article and I haven't read your 95% Trump articles, but I would suggest that whatever you think applies to one side applies to both.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Yes, the sites I visit the comments are 95% pro Trump.

Anyway, are you not going to dispute that that corporate media article I linked is hysterically one-sided and has next to no credibility?

---

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lardy

I haven't read the article and I haven't read your 95% Trump articles, but I would suggest that whatever you think applies to one side applies to both.

---

Maybe, maybe not. It depends on the propaganda element that either group is being exposed to, and whether their beliefs are obtained through manipulation or freewill, truth or lies etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

Here's an article they published yesterday which has the same editor's note at its end. Take a look then try and contend that it's anything other than ridiculous tosh. I've seen Huffington Post journalists interviewed on the BBC for their insights. Even TruBlue wouldn't describe this as objective. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0aac624863e02

---

Terrible acting and the script is a complete giveaway :biggrin: