-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
As for you Jirga.
If I want to debate with someone who hared my club I've got a knowledgeable Jack mate to do that with? So you can make 3-4 replies to my every post and it won't either make me respect your opinion or care about it.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lawnmower
Loramski.
I'm not meaning to be rude, but I'm not going to read all that. Long posts don't go well on my phone.
I've made my point and it's really no biggie if you don't agree.
I respect your opinion ( although not all that have disagreed with me) and want now to just enjoy the exciting few weeks we have to come.
👍
Sure, no problem. Let's move on.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Loramski
Sure, no problem. Let's move on.
I'll be at Ipswich if you want to debate it over a pint 👍
Won't be hard to find amongst the 200 or so.
Also...
I'll be the one shouting 'kill' every time Ipswich have the ball.
😂
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lawnmower
As for you Jirga.
If I want to debate with someone who hared my club I've got a knowledgeable Jack mate to do that with? So you can make 3-4 replies to my every post and it won't either make me respect your opinion or care about it.
Still avoiding the debate I see.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hilts
Hard but fair.
For his own sanity BIS should move on.
His gloating after our defeat to the wurzels minutes after the final whistle was a low.
Not particularly hard, let's be fair. What has my reaction to Tan's redbirds losing to Bristol City got to do with this thread?
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lawnmower
Loramski.
I'm not meaning to be rude, but I'm not going to read all that. Long posts don't go well on my phone.
I've made my point and it's really no biggie if you don't agree.
I respect your opinion ( although not all that have disagreed with me) and want now to just enjoy the exciting few weeks we have to come.
��
Except you don't respect his opinion. You've never respected an opinion that differs from yours, and you often delve into ridiculousness to make your point.
Loramski's post was hardly "long". What a cop out - like some of your challenges on a football pitch it seems.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
Not particularly hard, let's be fair. What has my reaction to Tan's redbirds losing to Bristol City got to do with this thread?
I've got to be honest I'm not sure you are Jirga. Your failure to ever leave anything rest reminds me of Roath
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
Still avoiding the debate I see.
You don't have anything to add.
I'm happy with my opinion, but respect that others don't agree ( although gave no respect for your opinion) and don't see the point in going around in circles.
You can't change that, no matter how many hollow gutless anonymous posts you make
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
As for your assumption about why I stop going to Cardiff games - it is wholly inaccurate. I stopped because Tan turned fan against fan.
Just as well you're around to build bridges again then innit.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lawnmower
You don't have anything to add.
I'm happy with my opinion, but respect that others don't agree ( although gave no respect for your opinion) and don't see the point in going around in circles.
You can't change that, no matter how many hollow gutless anonymous posts you make
Hollow and gutless - that's a bit rich coming from someone who has taken the "debate" to other forums to pour further unqualified speculation on me.
Run along you soppy old tart.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Baloo
Just as well you're around to build bridges again then innit.
What, by saying that Bennett's tackle was a bad one? I'm not the one who has turned this into petty personal insults. I'm also not the one who has turned this into another of those rebrand threads. I am likely to be the one to take the blame though!
It's flattering that you think I am both responsible and capable of building and knocking bridges down but I'm more amused that this thread is less about Bwnnett's awful challenge on Sane (which some Cardiff fans find amusing, but would be up in arms had it been reversed), and more to with slagging off my non attendance at Cardiff games - with some of the slagging off taking place on a forum run by people who have rarely attended games!
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
What, by saying that Bennett's tackle was a bad one? I'm not the one who has turned this into petty personal insults. I'm also not the one who has turned this into another of those rebrand threads. I am likely to be the one to take the blame though!
It's flattering that you think I am both responsible and capable of building and knocking bridges down but I'm more amused that this thread is less about Bwnnett's awful challenge on Sane (which some Cardiff fans find amusing, but would be up in arms had it been reversed), and more to with slagging off my non attendance at Cardiff games - with some of the slagging off taking place on a forum run by people who have rarely attended games!
I'm not referring to this thread. I agree having seen the pictures he should have received a red.
Just an observation that having left 'because Tan turned fan against fan', other than the usual message board bickering, you seem to have been more involved than most with ongoing ructions with other fans. Just seems a little ironic given the reason you stated for no longer going. Most seem to have decided to move on and thereby repair previous frictions - either from City sadly, or from the ridiculous rebrand.
I'm not planning to debate the issue with you, it's just an impression.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Baloo
I'm not referring to this thread. I agree having seen the pictures he should have received a red.
Just an observation that having left 'because Tan turned fan against fan', other than the usual message board bickering, you seem to have been more involved than most with ongoing ructions with other fans. Just seems a little ironic given the reason you stated for no longer going. Most seem to have decided to move on and thereby repair previous frictions - either from City sadly, or from the ridiculous rebrand.
I'm not planning to debate the issue with you, it's just an impression.
Um, you may need to take a look at Colonel Carediffi's board - apart from calling the lawnmower a tart earlier today, I don't really get involved in the name calling that is the predominant feature of the back-slappers board. I talk about football, I talk about Tan's cock-ups, I talk about my wish for Tan to sod off or, preferably, issue a full blown apology for the way he set fan v fan (again, I'll point you to Colonel Carediffi's board for an indication of how these things can manifest).
I make an observation, people usually ignore it, some debate it with civility, others turn it into a personal attack on me - to which I have a right to respond.
People, rightly, got upset when I posted I was happy to see Tan's team fail - I don't post such things anymore and instead of being selective about the sorts of things I supposedly post, perhaps take a look through my posting history with objectivity instead of subjectivity.
This is still, predominantly, a football message board. I still take an active interest in football and, in the near future, I will be attending games at CCS again because Tan won't stick around for much longer.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
Um, you may need to take a look at Colonel Carediffi's board - apart from calling the lawnmower a tart earlier today, I don't really get involved in the name calling that is the predominant feature of the back-slappers board. I talk about football, I talk about Tan's cock-ups, I talk about my wish for Tan to sod off or, preferably, issue a full blown apology for the way he set fan v fan (again, I'll point you to Colonel Carediffi's board for an indication of how these things can manifest).
I make an observation, people usually ignore it, some debate it with civility, others turn it into a personal attack on me - to which I have a right to respond.
People, rightly, got upset when I posted I was happy to see Tan's team fail - I don't post such things anymore and instead of being selective about the sorts of things I supposedly post, perhaps take a look through my posting history with objectivity instead of subjectivity.
This is still, predominantly, a football message board. I still take an active interest in football and, in the near future, I will be attending games at CCS again because Tan won't stick around for much longer.
Give it a rest mun you're like a broken record
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jamieccfc
Give it a rest mun you're like a broken record
I was replying to Baloo, and I was being civil. You don't have to read what I post, and the ignore user function is there for exactly this reason. You're also happily keeping the discussion alive by replying... make of that what you will.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
I was replying to Baloo, and I was being civil. You don't have to read what I post, and the ignore user function is there for exactly this reason. You're also happily keeping the discussion alive by replying... make of that what you will.
The ignore button is about as much use as a chocolate teapot!
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jamieccfc
The ignore button is about as much use as a chocolate teapot!
It's working wonders for me on Dembe - and I'm just adding you to my list. Bye!
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
Um, you may need to take a look at Colonel Carediffi's board - apart from calling the lawnmower a tart earlier today, I don't really get involved in the name calling that is the predominant feature of the back-slappers board. I talk about football, I talk about Tan's cock-ups, I talk about my wish for Tan to sod off or, preferably, issue a full blown apology for the way he set fan v fan (again, I'll point you to Colonel Carediffi's board for an indication of how these things can manifest).
I make an observation, people usually ignore it, some debate it with civility, others turn it into a personal attack on me - to which I have a right to respond.
People, rightly, got upset when I posted I was happy to see Tan's team fail - I don't post such things anymore and instead of being selective about the sorts of things I supposedly post, perhaps take a look through my posting history with objectivity instead of subjectivity.
This is still, predominantly, a football message board. I still take an active interest in football and, in the near future, I will be attending games at CCS again because Tan won't stick around for much longer.
Righteo, great update by the way :hehe:
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Baloo
Righteo, great update by the way :hehe:
?
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
I was replying to Baloo, and I was being civil. You don't have to read what I post, and the ignore user function is there for exactly this reason. You're also happily keeping the discussion alive by replying... make of that what you will.
But it's the same thing all the time I'm sure you've got better things to do
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jamieccfc
But it's the same thing all the time I'm sure you've got better things to do
Thats just it, he hasn't. He's one boring sad ****
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Butterwick Blue
Thats just it, he hasn't. He's one boring sad ****
At this moment in time, no I don't have anything better to do. I was contributing in a thread about Bennett's tackle on Sane. You are also contributing. The difference is, people know my opinion on the tackle. What's yours?
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
?
As I said it was just an impression. No disrespect, but I'm not really that interested in the ongoing motives and plans of somebody on the internet who I don't know. I personally know fans who wore red, marched like me and who no longer go.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Baloo
As I said it was just an impression. No disrespect, but I'm not really that interested in the ongoing motives and plans of somebody on the internet who I don't know. I personally know fans who wore red, marched like me and who no longer go.
Hence post #92... :hehe:
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
I was replying to Baloo, and I was being civil. You don't have to read what I post, and the ignore user function is there for exactly this reason. You're also happily keeping the discussion alive by replying... make of that what you will.
And Lawnmower was replying to Loramski, suited you to butt in then but you complain now the boot is on the other foot?
You really are one boring **** fair play.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
dembethewarrior
First Team
This message is hidden because dembethewarrior is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
Sorry dembe.... you'll have to talk a little louder.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
dembethewarrior
First Team
This message is hidden because dembethewarrior is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
Sorry dembe.... you'll have to talk a little louder.
Hmmm.
You directly replied to me not so long ago mind :hehe:
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Dirty bunch of bastards Man City - but of course Pep can't see anything wrong...
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Badly Ironed Shirt
Um, you may need to take a look at Colonel Carediffi's board - apart from calling the lawnmower a tart earlier today, I don't really get involved in the name calling that is the predominant feature of the back-slappers board. I talk about football, I talk about Tan's cock-ups, I talk about my wish for Tan to sod off or, preferably, issue a full blown apology for the way he set fan v fan (again, I'll point you to Colonel Carediffi's board for an indication of how these things can manifest).
I make an observation, people usually ignore it, some debate it with civility, others turn it into a personal attack on me - to which I have a right to respond.
People, rightly, got upset when I posted I was happy to see Tan's team fail - I don't post such things anymore and instead of being selective about the sorts of things I supposedly post, perhaps take a look through my posting history with objectivity instead of subjectivity.
This is still, predominantly, a football message board. I still take an active interest in football and, in the near future, I will be attending games at CCS again because Tan won't stick around for much longer.
Sorry to interject here but I just have one thing to say about a point you raised in this post.
I am sure that Mr Tan did not deliberately set out to set fan against fan, as you say, when he decided to change the colours to red as he would have known that this would be totally counter productive. His decision most likely came from a desire to raise further funds for the club from the far East and use a colour important to him and many other people in the part of the world he came from. He obviously made the decision without realising the depth of feeling from the fans or taking into account the history of the club, which he can not have been fully made aware of by his advisers. His decision must also at least partly have been based on the overall indication from the fans, in a number of surveys carried out, that they would accept a change to red on the basis he put forward. When he subsequently realised the depth of feeling against red he reversed his decision and did apologise. I am not sure what else he could have done to be honest but it seems that you want a grovelling apology for something he did not intend, which is unreasonable. For the last two years the club has been properly run within strict financial guidelines and we have now a manager who knows what he is doing. Why can you not let this go now and come back to watch the club you say you support, like quite a few other people have done. Its time to stop all this nonsense.
-
Re: Bennett makes a point on Sane recovery
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dml1954
Sorry to interject here but I just have one thing to say about a point you raised in this post.
I am sure that Mr Tan did not deliberately set out to set fan against fan, as you say, when he decided to change the colours to red as he would have known that this would be totally counter productive. His decision most likely came from a desire to raise further funds for the club from the far East and use a colour important to him and many other people in the part of the world he came from. He obviously made the decision without realising the depth of feeling from the fans or taking into account the history of the club, which he can not have been fully made aware of by his advisers. His decision must also at least partly have been based on the overall indication from the fans, in a number of surveys carried out, that they would accept a change to red on the basis he put forward. When he subsequently realised the depth of feeling against red he reversed his decision and did apologise. I am not sure what else he could have done to be honest but it seems that you want a grovelling apology for something he did not intend, which is unreasonable. For the last two years the club has been properly run within strict financial guidelines and we have now a manager who knows what he is doing. Why can you not let this go now and come back to watch the club you say you support, like quite a few other people have done. Its time to stop all this nonsense.
:thumbup: