based on his performances this season?
Printable View
You’re promoting the type of policy that has got the club into a playing/financial mess time and time again, bring in older, no resale players on big wages, then realise that their day is done, pay them off or keep them on the staff until their lucrative contract runs out. We’ve got to get away from this train of thought.
The question shouldn’t be wether Arter would get in our midfield or not. If we have play off ambitions next season the question should be would Arter get into any of the current top 6 teams in this division and the answer is most certainly NO.
JR following me round like a stray dog again.
No doubt adding great input to the threads subject matter in his own little style.
I find it quite funny that Mehmet has talked of the clubs new transfer policy like they have stumbled on some new age way of approaching it. Were we not checking the age of a player we were signing and considering their sell on potential previously?
This threads unbelievable. Theres people on this thread who have not only moaned at results but the style of play and want to 31 year old Harry Arter.
😂😂😂😂
The thread is nearly 100 posts long.
That's unbelievable! :hehe:
What's unbelievable is that drama queens in the thread are making it out like Lewj and I are saying Arter can take us to the Premier League 🤣
All we've said is that in our opinion he's better than that we've got but there's some argumentative people on this forum who'd start an argument in an empty Coronavirus affected stadium🤣
https://www.nottinghamforest.news/20...ew-forest-low/
Forest are apparently paying him £38k per week to play for their Under-23s.
oof
He should be a good player at this level, I'm surprised he can't get in their team.
But that wage is a hell of a lot to be getting no value from.
And the person criticising the club giving a contract to Tomlin wanted Arter.😂😂😂
38 k a week.
Thing is, we can't blame Warnock for that kind of think. Managers generally last less than 2 years in a job. Many of them aren't going to care if they're saddling the club with years of using up their whole wage bill for players who won't play - if they can get the best players for the season they are in. If they have one good year they'll get a job elsewhere and the mess will be someone else's problem.
The fault lies with the people who allow them to behave like that.
If only. I think our scouts are afraid of flying or get seasick. I wish we'd actually go and look at other European league players. And I mean, actually, go and look at them. We're so unimaginative at City.
I watched Moder last night from row A so really close and the guy's tall at 6'2" and can play midfield or wing-back. He's also really quick and looks like an athlete. I liked the way he communicated on the park. He's exactly the type of player we should be signing. The problem is, we think £6M is too expensive and we're skint when in fact if Tan wants to own a football club then bloody well take it seriously (and yes, this is relevant because we wouldn't need to be talking about the like's of Arter if we had a plan).
I think Tan owns a spreadsheet, not a football club. Cardiff City has a weak board with a poor track record and we're just a portfolio asset, not a living, breathing, football club right now. It all feels stale.
It seems we look at loanees (which I don't like) or 30+ signees (which I don't like). Yes, there have been some good signings from L1 & L2 but IMO there'll be more misses than hits which we need to factor in. Buy cheap, buy twice.
Young and hungry - now I do like the sound of that.
You're right, If Tomlin is regarded as finished (sadly) then what are we talking about Arter for?
Should be noted that Brexit has reduced number of leagues we can realistically look at and so there will be fewer bargains from Europe now.
Look at them more and look at them better! Likes of Lex Immers, Glatzel, Zohore, Juan Cala, Magnus Wolf Eikrem all came from abroad in one way or another.
Our scouting at moment limited to players known through ties to Arsenal, Republic of Ireland and Wolves or Crewe. How many scouts do we actually have and what are they doing?
£6m is expensive for a Championship club not in receipt of parachute payments!
Take a look at the transfer fees paid by Championship clubs this summer:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/cham...wettbewerb/GB2
You're right to highlight the Brexit issue and the complications. Our player base is predominantly English/Welsh (but mainly English) and as far as I am aware only Bacuna and D'Almeida are the only exceptions at present (I may be wrong). We have no European players. From what I can tell we have only 2 employed scouts and I do not know what they are doing. MMs RoI influence was a worry for me.
I don't think there are any bargains anywhere anymore. That's why I think if we're going to consider £6M too expensive (compared to the spaffed millions of just a couple of seasons ago) then what are the board's plans for the club?
Vincent Tan's net worth is circa $1.6 Billion. I think we're a spreadsheet and should stop making excuses. The Transfer market only tells a part of the story. We have a very wealthy owner and we're scrounging around in the bargain basement? Doesn't add up. Literally. And anyway, we were in receipt of parachute payments. Isn't that a point worth remembering. What did we do with that money and how wisely did we spend it? Isn't that what this discussion is all about really and why we're even discussing someone like Harry Arter?
Luckily and sensibly the throwing sums like 6m at players at this level is over.
No parachute payments we cant do it even if we could.
I agree and am aware that there are FFP rules. I guess my frustration at the moment is I feel we're stale. More to the point, the board is stale. Choo and Dalman have overseen two promotions and two immediate relegations. Their sanctioning of transfer fees, salaries, and appointments of managers have all cost the club dearly.
If Tan saw us as a living breathing football club and was genuinely interested, then new board appointments should surely have had to follow after allowing the squad to become as financially bloated with average players as they did (there's been one but he is another non-football guy and as I've questioned before, nobody seems to know what his actual role is) The bucks stop with the board and Tan. They are directly responsible (that's what they are paid for and is their job) for the two relegations. You can't claim the successes and forget about the failures. Going up once and coming down straight away was bad enough. To do it twice is unforgivable. The thing is, with our current set-up, we're likely to do it a third time too.
We've been caught napping since the lifting of lockdown. I see very little to no marketing of our club. The shop is badly managed. The ticket office is badly managed. For me, there's a kind of feeling of no hands-on senior management. It's just a feeling. That's why I'm frustrated that Harry Arter is even a discussion on here when I feel there are bigger issues at the club.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/card...rde/verein/603
8th most expensive, Manga, was worth the fee paid as was 12th most expensive (Smithies), 14th most expensive (Morrison), 19th most (Kimbo), 24th most (Thorne) and 25th (Vaulks) but we could have swerved on every other one on that first page and spent the money better elsewhere.
Not sure how it fits to this thread other than to say high transfer fees isn't all that and it being another post saying Brentford investing into talent ID with lower transfer fees paid is to be admired.