How didn’t that go in by Martin then
Printable View
How didn’t that go in by Martin then
Because it wasn't on target.Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Can be off target and still go inQuote:
Originally Posted by Carl Dale's Mole
Nelson off please Mick
Sums this board up. People will argue anything :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Attachment 4536Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Hoof defending is putting us in trouble.
We've been worse this half. Not looking good!
Get in
DeflectionsQuote:
Originally Posted by Carl Dale's Mole
YEYYEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
How did that go in by Moore
Finally!
I'll take that. He didn't want to let one in today did he.. So it had to go in somehow.
Off the keeper's back.Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Great. They scored an own goal - just the sort of thing MM hoped might turn up.
If a few more teams do that we might get promoted
What a magnificent goal!!!
Well.....................perhaps not.
But they all count.
City TV
"It takes a deflection off Kallas' foot and wrong foots the keeper"
Not sure I've heard a goal described so wrongly.
That cut back by Giles then, he's looking for Moore but that type of situation is SCREAMING OUT for a runner from midfield.
Some nice passing between Flint and mozza up top then :hehe:
We've been worse this half. Not looking good!
Had Bacuna's name written all over it. Where was he?Quote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
MurphyQuote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
I thought his whole contribution was that he supposedly "gets into good positions" :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
Not in an attacking midfielders position.Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
He hasn't done bad today in spells but I just don't like him in the position and I never will.
He should have been closing the keeper down just now as well when Moore chased the ball down in the corner.. Only one place the defender is going and its back to the keeper...
AbsolutelyQuote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Bacuna had two chances within a minute to clear the ball there. I'm sorry but he is ****ing shite.
Not great from both fullbacks.
Bacuna had two chances to clear the ball earlier in that attack and messed it up twice.
Bagan gets out to his man but its poor jumping from sang. But yes, should never have been in that position anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Dale's Mole
We aren't playing any fullbacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue lewj
Sums this board up. People will argue anythingQuote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
We've gone to a 442, so instead of putting a natural wide player on we put Colwill.. Who's not a winger.
Ref shit out there as well.
What a Fred Carnos.
Oh well start thumping it up in case the defence can swamp them and jam another last minute draw.
Is the goalkeeper taking part in the forward press yet ?
:hehe: bit of a difference mate, they aren't fullbacks. They're wingbacks. The comment you made that I replied to was a situation you probably could have just let go instead of not backing down.. Not rrappy that important to keep on about though so have a nice day :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
Fullbacks, wing backs, whatever they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
If one of them lets a cross coming in without getting anywhere near him and the one on the opposite side lets the ball float over his head without getting near the scorer then they are to blame.
Bacuna could have cleared it twice though.
We're not very good when the crosses are not very good.
"Good body contortion from Colwill" according to City TV.
Colwill using good feet and skill to get the ball out wide.. I counted 1 man.. Collins in the box.. So Colwill had to delay playing the ball.. We are 1 down and our whole play seems to centre around crossing the ball in, so why after 80 minutes a goal down aren't there players in the box?
Keeping things tight. Being hard to beat.Quote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
Oh wait....
Colwill hell of a player
Attachment 4537