Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
Stan, more than one person in the thread has pointed out his strengths. We get it.
It's great he's scored goals as well, that wasn't being questioned either was it? Or that
he's a fan favourite? Or he tries hard etc etc.
He didn't do his job yesterday, two massive chances to affect the game in a positive way and he ultimately didn't deliver. I agree he isn't always going to deliver, no player gets 100 percent of things right, but he'd done the hard work winning the ball. He needed to lay it off.
Vaulks was slammed in the match thread and ran his arse off, wasn't that bad, yet people feels comfortable having a pop at him, yet it seems we can't discuss Uche and what he did wrong because, why?
(This isn't arguing fans, it's discussing)