You have had plenty of time and thats just nonsense
How about all you right wingers house all the homeless for say 6 months ?
You are going to have to come up with something better than that
Printable View
You sound like farage
The usual talk from that lot is ....what about our own ? ....our soldiers , our homeless etc etc
So I thats the case and you suggest WE take in these immigrants then you lot take in the homeless ?
Pretty stupid arguement really thinking the immigrants are the cause of all our problems but thats you lot to a tee
Now try again with some proper policies , you have had long enough
Aww Sludgie. You are like a broken record, and have been on here for yrs.
“You lot” , “right wing” 😂, you haven’t got a clue. I’m a working class lad from Ely, who hasn’t voted Tory in my life. Labour either for yrs.
The lot of them are absolutely useless.!
I dipped my toe into this thread just to give you a chance to type more continuous drivel, and have a laugh. Goes to show how a few clicks can send a blind fool like you into overdrive.
This really is the loony section of the MB.
Keep off the mushrooms, get yourself a job, contribute to the country, and stay off here for a while. That’s my advice to you sonny.
Well thats all very romantic but you have been asked several times to provide sensible ideas to deal with immigration
You dipped into this thread and you have just typed complete nonsense which is what you seem to be accusing others of
I dont care where you are from , your background as we have had that before , I couldnt care less , I was in school in Ely for a few years .....give me a medal 🏅
I have helped the homeless , veterans , the disadvantaged in paid and voluntary employment over 30 years on and off ....working on young person's housing and advice projects , charities providing welfare advice to those in need .....maybe you should try contributing to society too you silly old fruitcake
Now then.....today labour ...who are crap ..have announced attempts to speed up the asylum appeals process and get people who shouldn't be here out of the country , quicker
I would imagine that fits well with you but if it doesnt instead of your sanctimonious I am working class cobblers why dont you.....for tge fourth time of asking ....come up with some ideas .......
You sound like an echo chamber shouting " stop the boats " .....get on with it , try and be constructive instead of coming over like a poundshop CJ off Reggie Perrin
You still havnt answered the question as to what can be done
Never mind Jenrick you said
I have put forward what labour who we know are struggling intend doing
But you have just said stop the boats !
Thats about it
I was going to leave it here but you have got arsey again on another tgread , probably because you have fallen at the first fence on here
1. Which human rights laws would you like to delete?
2. Isn't it rather disingenuous for a country that invaded scores of others, often leaving behind complete social and political chaos (cf. Palestine, Afghanistan, South Africa ...) after empire had ended, to complain about people from those very same countries now wanting to come to what they see as the "mother" land?
They don't show that as far as I know.
I am extrapolating from the polls that show a big drop in support by younger voters for Reform at the same time as polls show very high support for Your Party from the same age group.
I am also looking at the polls that show very high levels of support from Reform voters (especially ex Red Wall) for a fully-funded public NHS, a wealth tax, and nationalisation of basic services and utilities - all of which sit better in the Corbyn-Sultana pitch than any other party (including the Greens), although there are still some doubts about ability to deliver (though that is an even bigger problem for Reform).
I am also looking at the very recent polling that shows Reform voters prefer Corbyn (and Sultana) by a distance to Starmer and his circle.
That is why I believe there is evidence that ex-Labour voters who recently backed Reform - not the UKIP core vote - will be attracted to the new party. There is a strand of social conservatism amongst the current Independent group in Parliament (who are likely to join the new party), but the main issue will be on immigration and how that argument plays out, and whether or not it is more important for voters (including Reform voters) than cost of living, public services, public control, wealth taxes and the other key elements of the new party's pitch.
Whilst you are being so virtuos again!!!
Angela Rayner has purchased a third property. She recently acquired a seaside apartment in Hove, on England’s south coast, for over £700,000. This adds to her existing residences:
A home in her Ashton-under-Lyne constituency (bought in 2016 for around £375,000, now valued at about £650,000), and
A grace-and-favour ministerial flat in Admiralty House, Westminster.
Would you like to explain how someone on an MP's salary has managed to accumulate two houses, forget the third as its grace-and-favour :hehe: and considering her previous employments were care worker & union official.
Jesus managed to feed 5000 from five loaves of bread and two fish., but this miracle is nowhere near the miracle that miss Raynor has managed to pull off!! labours champagne socialism in full view and they do not give a fck who sees it.
Would you like to ask her to make available two of her residences to others in need ?
Your persistent berating of others when you voted for this crap is hypocrisy at its finest, its time you took a rest to evaluate what your party is doing to the UK and start issuing some apologies. I would suggest you start with James who has ripped you a new arsehole time after time on this MB with reasoned thought out answers only for you to have one response, he's done you like a kipper SONNY. James has the patience of a saint trying to reason with you I'll just call you a cash in hand FRAUD, your reputation in the trade precedes you.
I have also just read that on various X and reddit pages. Maybe the £4.7m 'wealth' figure includes declared donations to run her office (standard for senior politicians) or maybe it is just made up crap. There is no evidence for significant personal wealth that I can see. The story about her buying a second/third home in London may be true (if she is doing the buying) but the alleged cost has jumped up £100k in 24 hours. None of the figures are evidenced.
She doesn't have major investments, she doesn't do paid work outside Parliament, she may be getting brown envelopes from donors or lobbyists - but no one has given any evidence I can see.
This piece looks most reasonable:
https://www.tuko.co.ke/facts-lifehac...what-net-worth
Always fair to be on the look out for grifters and hypocrites, but Angela Raynor seems to attract a particular type of venom that is less to do with her views or actions as a senior politician, and more to do with her sex and her background.
I cant stand the hypocrisy of rayner , look over my posts you silly sod
James is like you , hes a tory boy too whereas you are working class tory which is even worse, I am alright Jack.....no wonder you agree with all his nonsense....
I wouldn't have charged you for any work, I would have done it because I felt sorry for you
But if I had , it would have been cheque
No flies on me mr gammon
I disagree with what she did with buying her Council home in 2008 - then selling it in 2015.
We are mostly on the same page about Right To Buy - although I am less critical of the individuals who took advantage and more of the politicians who made it happen.
But she is not a hypocrite on that - just wrong - she always supported Right To Buy (although like a lot of other Labour people who has no problem with and took advantage of RTB, she salved her conscience by arguing the discounts were too high).
But the latest controversy is not about Right To Buy. It is a cheap and hypocritical shot from James Cleverley for the Tories. It looks as if he has succeeded in making himself look stupid. Can you believe.....? :hehe:
Av It !!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC_P_ypDQZE
She's definitely not criticised for her gender!
I actually like her in the sense she is down to earth. Buy she rubs people up the wrong way. And when she talks of "Tory scum" she loses any right to avoid criticism.
She's a hypocrite. Of course she is. They all are. More fool any of you that thought a change of government would be different
Does she have different rules to Thatcher, Theresa May and Lizz Truss?, she's been rightly critised because of her policy and her hypocrisy that's it. FWIT, she's only the front carrying out policy's for her globalist pay masters but does it with a smile on her face a truly awful woman.
No same rules - although Thatcher was gone before the social media age so avoided the worst.
Of course Rayner should be criticised for her political decisions and personal hypocrisy. I am not a fan - far from it.
But to deny as you and James appear to do that female politicians ( especially prominent black or working class politicians) do not get an extra level of abuse - including regular rape threats from anonymous creeps - is to deny reality. Diane Abbott is still the top target - but Rayner is up there, as are women MPs from other parties.
Hmm, yeah I just don't buy that Jon. Im pretty alert to any genuine misogyny, and I have called out the use of such terms by a certain poster on here numerous times. I also have daughters and I am particularly aware of snobbery, which i despise. I really don't think people are criticising them for their gender or class.
I guess some individuals may, but it doesn't counter out people who abuse-for example- Jacob Rees Mogg for his poshness or Trump for his small hands and no one was more mocked for their appearance than Boris Johnson.
So I really don't think it is the case tbh and the numbers below seem to suggest that.
I have to say I really do hate personal abuse on any level, and especially towards MPs and councillors etc, as I respect them standing for public office even if I disagree with them. But I do think the abuse is fairly across the board of im honest
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63330885
Dianne Abbott and Emily Thornberry.
Did more to shoot themselves in their feet than any critic could possibly do.
Nothing whatsoever to do with racism or misogyny.
Both come across is nasty to me, Thornberry much, much worse though.
Angela Rayner is just feathering her nest like 9/10’s of all politicians, although she doesn’t help herself at all given her position.
In that regard, she is no worse than anybody and better than Boris Johnson .
Lisa Nandy carries herself far better, seems much more earnest…but doesn’t seem to have the gravitas.
I honestly believe that the vast, vast majority of politicians, right now are absolute ****’s.
Just like in America, politicians on good salaries are managing to increase their wealth at extraordinary levels all whilst shitting all over those who gave them the seat
, the current ccmb massive narrative is that champagne socialist female MPs are not allowed to be criticized this from the crowd that cheered on the vitriol leveled on this MB when it has been Thatcher May and Truss as the target, how's DC looking after the crime crackdown?
Forget that. I've just looked them up. So a far right(er) split from Reform - set up 2 months ago?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_UK
If the MAGAsphere thinks Musk will be funding them, does that mean that twat Rupert Lowe has joined?
Is the Musk-Lowe bromance still a thing?