Corbyn's interview (or non interview) with Sky on Sunday

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:13

Y'know feedy, for someone who was saying this about Corbyn only last night:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:02

it is about time we had clear division in our two main parties. I think this is a welcome appointment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 21:12

You haven't half railed against him a lot.

---

---

---

b) Nobody in this thread is claiming or even acting as if he's the new messiah, this is a thread about whether he was within his rights to ignore a question from one boob on the street

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jon1959 wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:11

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:51

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:42

I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 08:45

What the hell does this mean Feedcrap?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

I know you mostly talk bollocks which you are proving admirably yet again in this thread , but this nonsensical comment is truly mystifying , even for you.

---

---

---

---

---

perhaps you need to look at how sludge, mick et al hold those on the right with such disdain as an example of the lack of respect emanating from certain sections of the left.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:19

Y'know feedy, for someone who was saying this about Corbyn only last night:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:13

it is about time we had clear division in our two main parties. I think this is a welcome appointment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:02

You haven't half railed against him a lot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 21:12

EDIT: My mistake, you were referring to John McDonnell. Apologies.

---

---

---

---

for someone who started the day on track you've really misjudged this conversation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jon1959 wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:11

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:51

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:42

I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 08:45

What the hell does this mean Feedcrap?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

I know you mostly talk bollocks which you are proving admirably yet again in this thread , but this nonsensical comment is truly mystifying , even for you.

---

---

---

---

---

Oh god, that is so spot on http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

You have to ask would Ed Milliband have done that ?

Hell No http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/getmycoat.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:19

Y'know feedy, for someone who was saying this about Corbyn only last night:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:19

it is about time we had clear division in our two main parties. I think this is a welcome appointment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:13

You haven't half railed against him a lot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:02

EDIT: My mistake, you were referring to John McDonnell. Apologies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 21:12

no apology necessary. I like Corbyn as well as Mcdonnell.

---

---

---

---

---

Yes, in retrospect, responding to you is never advisable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 00:44

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

---

---

---

---

---

His car was outside, it was just chained to the railings and he didn't want anyone to see the combination to the lock.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:14

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:51

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:42

I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 08:45

What the hell does this mean Feedcrap?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

I know you mostly talk bollocks which you are proving admirably yet again in this thread , but this nonsensical comment is truly mystifying , even for you.

---

---

---

---

---

is that a request or an instruction? Can I follow the chosen one's lead and ignore the question without any ramifications whatsoever? or does that logic not apply to everyone only the bearded man who walks on water?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rs3100 wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:20

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 00:44

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

Don't recall him getting much sympathy. Didn't deserve it,neither does Corbyn now.

---

---

---

---

---

---

i thought Corbyn eschewed the car and preferred pedal power?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:17

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by babyloncardiff wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:10

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:00

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

Don't recall him getting much sympathy. Didn't deserve it,neither does Corbyn now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

Howard was on Newsnight. He had voluntarily gone on there for the specific purpose of being asked questions and providing answers.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Cameron is always doing it, mid interview. When he's decided he's answered enough questions he strides off mid conversation like a character in an online game who has pressed the skip button to end the conversation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redjk wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:23

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:17

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by babyloncardiff wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:10

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:00

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

Don't recall him getting much sympathy. Didn't deserve it,neither does Corbyn now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

Howard was on Newsnight. He had voluntarily gone on there for the specific purpose of being asked questions and providing answers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

In this case Corbyn is being chased down the road by rude TV paparatzi that clearly did not have an agreement to interview him.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

so cameron gives an answer then, perhaps not a complete answer but still an answer all the same. He is still ahead of the messiah at this stage

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:51

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:42

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 08:45

I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

What the hell does this mean Feedcrap?

---

---

---

---

It's very rarely I discuss politics with my wife but since Corby has been in the frame, we both agree that it is good for politics as he is a true alternative to what has prevailed for years, his potential downfall is that he is followed by many who cannot debate anything unless they are verbally bullying, I know it doesn't bother you neither does it bother me, it might impress the 14 year olds on the board but Corbyn is going to be hindered with the bully boy type of lefties that hang on to his coattails, I think the country needs solid left socialists but it's the caveman attitude that needs to be dropped.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:21

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:14

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:51

I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:42

What the hell does this mean Feedcrap?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 08:45

I know you mostly talk bollocks which you are proving admirably yet again in this thread , but this nonsensical comment is truly mystifying , even for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

your response is symptomatic of my mistrust of socialists. you simply cannot accept differing opinions to yours and look to talk down to those who don't share your world view.

---

---

---

---

---

---

Just answer the question Wriggler.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:22

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rs3100 wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:20

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 00:44

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

Don't recall him getting much sympathy. Didn't deserve it,neither does Corbyn now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

Howard was on Newsnight. He had voluntarily gone on there for the specific purpose of being asked questions and providing answers.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Oh! I didn't know that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:25

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redjk wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:23

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:17

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by babyloncardiff wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:10

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:00

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

Don't recall him getting much sympathy. Didn't deserve it,neither does Corbyn now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

Howard was on Newsnight. He had voluntarily gone on there for the specific purpose of being asked questions and providing answers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

In this case Corbyn is being chased down the road by rude TV paparatzi that clearly did not have an agreement to interview him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

Two very different scenarios.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

You're not getting a rise out of me. Take your obvious trolling elsewhere, who do you think you are? Croesy?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:29

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:21

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:14

I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:51

What the hell does this mean Feedcrap?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mick the Miller wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:42

I know you mostly talk bollocks which you are proving admirably yet again in this thread , but this nonsensical comment is truly mystifying , even for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 08:45

your response is symptomatic of my mistrust of socialists. you simply cannot accept differing opinions to yours and look to talk down to those who don't share your world view.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

Answer my question please.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

I will follow the messiah's lead and exercise my right to not answer. Do you have a problem with that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redjk wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:34

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:25

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redjk wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:23

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:17

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by babyloncardiff wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 10:10

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:00

Don't recall him getting much sympathy. Didn't deserve it,neither does Corbyn now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

Howard was on Newsnight. He had voluntarily gone on there for the specific purpose of being asked questions and providing answers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

In this case Corbyn is being chased down the road by rude TV paparatzi that clearly did not have an agreement to interview him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

Two very different scenarios.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

do you need an agreement to ask a politician a question?

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

I was merely pointing out that you accept Cameron at least gave part of an answer, which is more than we can now expect from the anointed one.

You bet he will

He will do what he does to everyone else that disagrees with him - and refuse to speak to you.

In Mick's world - it's a very lonely place - on the upside - everyone else is happy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feedback wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 09:00

He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by archibald leitch wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:59

I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:43

This.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:29

I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi wrote on Mon, 14 September 2015 23:22

When Michael Howard refused to answer Paxmans question as to whether he had overruled the Head of the Prison service regarding the sacking of a prison governor he was quite justifiably asked the question 12 times and prevaricated each time (he eventually answered 7 years later when Paxman asked him again!!!)

---

---

---

---

---

Murdoch will spin it the way he wants to spin it no matter what Corbyn says or does in the real world.

Archie - Good on him - but he does need a way (if he wants to win people over) to communicate to people who are not hard left card carrying brothers and sisters of the union.

If he wont do that through press channels he dislikes - then he needs to find another way.

The only way being (I guess) is social media - ala Russell Brand - but then again - not everyone uses twitter or will tune into Jezza TV.

So he needs to get his message across using platforms like sky news - whether he likes it or not.

No problem whatsoever with Corbyn refusing to speak with the Murdoch owned media. He should though get himself a decent press officer with a human face like Owen Jones and do it sooner rather than later.

Quite a few mares happening here:

Elwood
Feedy
Jimmy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alfie sherwood wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 12:57

No problem whatsoever with Corbyn refusing to speak with the Murdoch owned media. He should though get himself a decent press officer with a human face like Owen Jones and do it sooner rather than later.

---

I've tried explaining this elsewhere but people like Archie think that PR is for others and Corbyn doesn't need it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kiffa wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 12:59

Quite a few mares happening here:

---

Along with The Penguin it's been like a rightwing bloodbath. http://www.ccmb.co.uk/images/smiley_icons/hehe.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kiffa wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 12:59

Quite a few mares happening here:

---

if you think I've had a mare then you've certainly had a whoosh