£15 rise wanted, Government not happy. It’s about time the Corporation was partly funded by advertising.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BBC LIcence Fee Hike
Collapse
X
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
Lots of people have stopped paying haven't they, since they made the pensioners pay again, they don't seem to enforce it like they used to, maybe harder to do so now?Originally posted by Cleve van Leef View Post£15 rise wanted, Government not happy. It’s about time the Corporation was partly funded by advertising.
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
Since the fee was frozen, and pensioners given an exemption, the service has had to make huge cuts due to the drop in licence revenue. Its not surprising they want a relatively big increase. Either allow it or allow them to collect advertising revenue.
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
Turn them private no one wants to pay for it, give Lineker and co a pay cut, if they can make it work through advertising great if not they can do some streaming channels or something.Originally posted by The Bloop View PostSince the fee was frozen, and pensioners given an exemption, the service has had to make huge cuts due to the drop in licence revenue. Its not surprising they want a relatively big increase. Either allow it or allow them to collect advertising revenue.
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
You have to be over75 to get it free, not just of pension age.Originally posted by The Bloop View PostSince the fee was frozen, and pensioners given an exemption, the service has had to make huge cuts due to the drop in licence revenue. Its not surprising they want a relatively big increase. Either allow it or allow them to collect advertising revenue.
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
I'm happy to pay it as I think it's good value for money. Just this weekend we've watched Have I got News for you, Match of the Day (1 and 2), Planet Earth 3, Doctor Who, listened to some music on BBC Sounds and read numerous News and Sport stories on the website.Originally posted by North Cardiff Blue View PostTurn them private no one wants to pay for it, give Lineker and co a pay cut, if they can make it work through advertising great if not they can do some streaming channels or something.
If we to rely just on Streamers we wouldn't have anywhere near as much local news and sport coverage.
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
Originally posted by PontBlue View PostI'm happy to pay it as I think it's good value for money. Just this weekend we've watched Have I got News for you, Match of the Day (1 and 2), Planet Earth 3, Doctor Who, listened to some music on BBC Sounds and read numerous News and Sport stories on the website.
If we to rely just on Streamers we wouldn't have anywhere near as much local news and sport coverage.
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
Originally posted by PontBlue View PostI'm happy to pay it as I think it's good value for money. Just this weekend we've watched Have I got News for you, Match of the Day (1 and 2), Planet Earth 3, Doctor Who, listened to some music on BBC Sounds and read numerous News and Sport stories on the website.
If we to rely just on Streamers we wouldn't have anywhere near as much local news and sport coverage.
:thimbup:

Where would we be without those Attenborough wildlife documentaries?
Did you wee those macaques nicking mobile phones and bartering to give them back? Clever monkeys!
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
They potentially will, but if an increase doesn't happen, then they can expect further cuts to the beebs output.Originally posted by JumpersforGoalposts View PostI think a significant increase could well lead to a lot of people re-evaluating the value they get from "live" tv as opposed to streaming/catch-up services.
I also thinks it's quite ironic that the government are citing the cost of living as an argument against the proposed increase.
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
People can re-evaluate all they like, but these are the facts regarding annual costs of the licence and the most popular streaming services. With all that you get from the BBC my view is it's worth every penny.Originally posted by JumpersforGoalposts View PostI think a significant increase could well lead to a lot of people re-evaluating the value they get from "live" tv as opposed to streaming/catch-up services.
Sky (Bloody everything) £948
Sky (Basic Package) £228
Netflix £216
BBC £159 (Proposed increase to £174)
Disney £109
Apple TV £108
Prime Video £95
Paramount + £83
ITV X £60
It seems it's the right are the ones who are most against the licence as long as it gets rid of Lineker and the rest of his woke ilk. Isn't it Murdoch and his rags that seem to shout the loudest about abolishing the licence fee? Wonder why
Comment
-
Re: BBC LIcence Fee Hike
You may well be right in terms of the paid services but for those "feeling the pinch" financially the comparison is to the plethora of free services that provide plenty of tv shows and movies.Originally posted by fingers View PostPeople can re-evaluate all they like, but these are the facts regarding annual costs of the licence and the most popular streaming services. With all that you get from the BBC my view is it's worth every penny.
Sky (Bloody everything) £948
Sky (Basic Package) £228
Netflix £216
BBC £159 (Proposed increase to £174)
Disney £109
Apple TV £108
Prime Video £95
Paramount + £83
ITV X £60
It seems it's the right are the ones who are most against the licence as long as it gets rid of Lineker and the rest of his woke ilk. Isn't it Murdoch and his rags that seem to shout the loudest about abolishing the licence fee? Wonder why
Comment
Quick Navigation
Collapse

Comment