Printable View
All 97% of them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
What a transformation on your part as well, from self styled seeker of the truth who considers all angles before forming an opinion, to fully fledged Donald Trump cheerleader in just over a month - I'm pleased for you.
But Donald trump the billionaire businessman is such an outsider.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
He watches that alternative news channel as well which isn't main stream media ( Fox News)
God bless him eh?
97% of what though? What kind of filtering was used?Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
"The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future exact climate states is not possible." From an IPCC report. Nothing more needs to be said.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/index.php?idp=36
And one man's Donald Trump cheerleader is another man's anti-Clintonist supporter :biggrin: You have chosen your side, let's see how it all works out for you. You are an intelligent man, I just fail to see how the Clinton crime spree has escaped your attention. Let's revisit this topic further down the line, yeah? But right now until proved wrong, I am firmly on the sides of the victims.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Who says I'm on the Clinton's side? As I've said a few times on here, I wouldn't have voted for Clinton or Trump. Instinctively, I'm against "professional politicians" and certainly do not like the idea of an unelected elite controlling things, but I've also got no enthusiasm whatsoever for what is on offer as an alternative - if it's a choice between the so called liberal progressives and Trump, Le Pen, Wilders, Farage etc. give me the former any day of the week.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Fair enough, and now that you mention it, who says I'm on Trump's side? :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
So what is the endgame of these so called liberal progressives that you are advocating, the one being mapped out by it's architects such as Clinton, Soros, Obama, and the rest of their cohorts?
What a surprise that the "fake news" idiots also don't believe in the scientifically proven global warming and are anti vaccination.
There is plenty of concrete evidence for global warming you can go research yourself without having to use the main stream media output, most scientific journals are free and easy to access if you want to see some unspun source data.
Vaccinations are also proven to be positive. Just go back and look at a world with small pox. The whole mmr autism link was made up by some simpleton and for some reason people won't let it go. Autism signs appear at the same age people were getting the mmr jab, hence the ridiculous link. Again 10 minutes of independent research will show this.
I absolutely love how the "anti main stream media sheeple" are now at the behest of the real fake news. It's the most ironic twist, everyone but the idiots themselves saw coming.
Very Machiavellian or what.Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
Have you ever debated a point? Or are you just as thick as your one word answers paint you to be?
I'm one of your "fake news idiots" but I believe in vaccination but then again I think that Rolf Harris and Jimmy Savile might be innocent so that probably still makes me an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
It is not just a question of whether there is a global warning. It is mainly about whether this warming is man made and whether the costs of combating it, assuming it is man made, are worth it. Nothing in your scientific journals will throw much light on the last question. Anyway, you are assuming that the authors of these climate science articles are independent and trustworthy. Fraud and bias is endemic in science just as it is in every other area of life. You just can't accept the words of climate scientists blindly.
Nothing to debate, you were stating everything as fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
How did they choose the group of scientists who were 97% in agreement with global warming?Quote:
Originally Posted by David Vincent
If you looked up "Progressive" or "Liberal" in a dictionary, it wouldn't say "relating to a political philosophy devised by Bill and Hilary Clinton, Barrack Obama and George Soros" - I believed in liberal progressive values before the four people I named were recognisable public figures believe it or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
It's so predictable isn't it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
I agree with your last paragraph as well.
Whose "they"? The Clintons, Obama and Soros?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Do you think they had a ring around their mates and asked? :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
It's 97% (or between 90 and 100% depending how you measure) of 12 thousand peer reviewed papers published on climate change between 1991 and 2011.
Note: 12,000 = all
It is they who call themselves liberal progressives, when in fact they have highjacked that label in their attempt to establish a one world government, while fooling millions of naive people along the way.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
That doesn't mean you can't debate them if you don't believe it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
You're like a stereotype man, quoting absolute nonsense as fact but then laughing down everything else.
I'm sure we will all find out one way or another, now that President Trump has the keys to the White House and all it's little secrets. It's no wonder a lot of establishment players are desperate to get him out of there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
****ing hell :hehe:
I knew what that article was going to say before I even opened it. Likewise, I know it would have been the opposite opinion if you had posted a DM link. What we have are opposing agendas and ideologies, and each side is going publish absolutely anything that backs their side of the story. It's actually quite comical to watch :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2...ing-the-world/
This is clearly presented data
Obviously fake news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
I'm anti-vaccines for myself, everyone else can do what they want but I know I am at risk of autoimmune conditions so I don't want them, is that a problem?Quote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
This study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives highlights some new understandings as to why the number of people suffering with autoimmune diseases continues to skyrocket.
Here are a couple of short videos explaining a bit about it too, I have some 2/3 hour ones but they are a bit boring if you are not really interested in the subject.
You might think I'm mad but if you take more than 10 mins on the subject and knew what allergies I already have you would clearly see why I don't want to have any. :thumbup:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCl-1c5XWT8&t=620s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfraYYGYDA8
Clearly presented by who? We know that globalist controlled publications are told what to write by fellow globalists. I'm not questioning the data, just stating what we know about the media :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
There you go with that Royal we again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The journal you've linked appears to be talking about levels of mercury rather than vaccines.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R
A congress member on the house ethics, judiciary and oversight commitees stated that in a meeting last Thursday, the Director of the FBI told him that publications such as the New York Times and Washington Post (MSM) cannot be trusted for factual informaton.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Forgot to mention, we already knew from DNC emails that MSM journalists were submitting articles to Democrat staffers for vetting and amendmend prior to publication.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Which articles?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Since the original source of the information is the DNC, I would have though it obvious they were talking about articles pertaining to the Democrats and political issues in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
That's the guy who won the election for Trump isn't it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Maybe he is a patriot, I'm assuming he has the full scoop on Clinton and Obama.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Isn't it called Climate change nowadays ? (to cover all bases) :hehe:
Because I was talking about autoimmune conditions, autoimmunity can be triggered by many things, diet, pollen, things in the environment such as mercury in seafood, anything that stimulates the immune system in to creating a response which is what vaccines are designed to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
http://www.romania-insider.com/measl...children-dead/
Big anti-vaccination campaign in Romania. They say MMR can cause autism.
Measles outbreak kills 17 kids and counting this year alone.
Purely coincidental.