I don’t know what to think of that. So many talking points but when they went down to 10 we should’ve picked them off, we looked clueless and lacked belief.
Printable View
I don’t know what to think of that. So many talking points but when they went down to 10 we should’ve picked them off, we looked clueless and lacked belief.
2 players offside for their goal https://twitter.com/threebluebirds_/...729832451?s=21
Bang on. You win some, you lose some. Ref evened it out. Next game please.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
SSN saying it was Flint for foul and abusive language.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
it was FlintQuote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
Really? He was either on the floor, bouncing off defenders or mistiming his run. Can see the potential, he needs to find the space and play away from the defenders. Didn’t see anything better than Harris has.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorcus
Originally on BBC website there was no confirmation. There is now.
He should not have been allowed to stay on the pitch at the end to applaud the Cardiff fans.
Agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Where have u got it was Pack?. Seemed to show the red at Flint and all reports have Flint.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
Of course there was such mayhem they could be wrong.
He wasn't. It was Flint.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
Twice he was in and mis timed his run. Atleast he was in a position to get it wrong though, that's positive :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Des Parrot
Strange pair them commentators.Quote:
Originally Posted by splott parker
"He's got him round the throat" for the pen. Not when close on the clip I saw..
makes sense, you would probably find a pen in an officeQuote:
Originally Posted by 2b2bdoo
they're almost always given, I never think they should be though, no way was the contact enough to bring him down. can see why they're annoyed thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
SSN all about the penalty not given at the end but haven't even mentioned their miles offside "goal".
Hadn't the whistle gone?Quote:
Originally Posted by MacAdder
mukes of hazardQuote:
Originally Posted by MacAdder
Thought so at the time, but red button doesn't show replays, and you can't pause/rewind either.Quote:
Originally Posted by ninian opinian
Exactly, no way was there enough pressure to bring him down, the way he goes down makes that pretty obvious as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
It was Flint.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindec
Feck me that was a quick reply. I corrected my mistake :tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott-light...
‘Nine Men West Brom, held by Cardiff’ according to the BBC. How ridiculous.
Obviously. It happened at the death and caused all the action at the final whistle. Its the bigger talking point.Quote:
Originally Posted by MacAdder
Didn't expect to get anything away to them so to get a point i'm pretty happy :xmasayatollah:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
On the Sky Red Button the commentary said Pack but there was such chaos at the end it could have been Flint. The WBA manager was to blame for all of this and I'm sure the authorities will do something about that retrospectively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilts
We had no idea what to do once they went down to 10 which is disappointing
Decent point though
Supposedly there was an altercation in the dugout with West Brom fans shouting at Vaulks that he's a cheat etc, pathetic. That challenge was awful and Vaulks could have been seriously injured
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
So you reckon if the roles were reversed they would not have mentioned the equalising goal?Quote:
Originally Posted by dembethewarrior
We are part of the narrative, which ain't in our favour.
Not paranoia, just fact.
We don't seem to have much going forward - anything attacking was dependent on Giles or a set-piece. Generally solid though and more than I expected.Quote:
Originally Posted by City123
Yeah, very little going forwardQuote:
Originally Posted by Bluebirdman Of Alcathays
I suppose the issues is the midfield was very much one that would be described as "functional" rather than creative and clearly the plan was to be solid, that all changes when they go down to 10
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
I did say just after it happened we were lucky to get away with the Flint challenge.
Stone waller for me.
Happy with a point there when all's said and done.
Not a penalty for me. Yes, Pack had hands on him, but the WBA player obviously dived. There was no pulling, no shoving. That's the kind of bullshit that gets given by VAR. Most refs wouldn't give that in real-time.
Okay, maybe not a stone wall penalty but these are very often given.Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
It depends how much force there has been in the pull back and only the players themselves know whether it was enough.
Pull a shirt and you run the risk.
If it was outside the box then I reckon they'd be given nine times out of ten and the way that the ref had been officiating all through the game, I would not have been at all surprised had a pelanty been awarded.
I doubt Pack would have had much defence had it been.
It was a stupid challenge whichever way you view it.
It was stupid. If anyone on here can tell me why Pack had his hands on the WBA players shoulders as he's attempting to get around the outside of him then i'd be interested to know what the reason was. I'd very much doubt that it was for anyone elses benefit apart from pack, and i very much doubt that it would have helped the WBA player in any positive way, in fact, it could be argued that it impeded his movement. Thankfully, the Ref didn't see it that way, probably because they had scored an offside goal and it was the final kick of the game. For me, a penalty, i'd expect it if it was us and i would be disappointed if it wasn't given. As would the majority on here who are saying it wasn't a penalty. That's football.Quote:
Originally Posted by MacAdder
wow, player between the defender and goal, can't be any easier to spotQuote:
Originally Posted by ninian opinian
is there anyone out of picture, to the left?Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
Don't think so. But also looks a '90% penalty' from the replays. Not sure why Pack was doing that, so daft. I'd also like to say what big-hearted bloke Flint is. I know most players give 100% but he just exudes effort and passion. If City could find a 30yr old Bamba to play alongside him in a back 4, we would let in half the goals we currently do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
That's the point, Pack gave the ref a decision to make, idiot. I like Flint, he works hard and doesn't go missing when he makes a mistake or things get tough for him. Limited at times but honest and competitive. He's a good pro.Quote:
Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish
I still do not see this as a penalty......
Incredible the turnaround in his Cardiff career, from an overpriced (I'd say he still is) donkey to cult hero!Quote:
Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish