Asterisk of posting on this forum, you're always likely to pulled up for grammar mistakes. :hehe:
Printable View
If it took Tan six months to realise Riza was crap and six weeks to appoint a new Manager, why would people he'll decide on and sell the club in a week :hehe:
It is the total lack of any corroborating evidence from any other media agency which surely must set alarm bells ringing in the minds of even the regulars on there,with some of the dogmatic being made,their thread on the takeover is starting to have the feel of an urban myth,which everybody knows is fact but no one knows where it started.
I have also noticed one or two of his followers are now saying they've been told by their contacts , which is no doubt BS,That Tan was advised not to sell yet . Are the mods now preparing to slowly drip feed us with bad news,then drop the bombshell,Tan doesn't want to sell
To be fair, I think he was genuine. In passing, I have come across him once or twice in person and he does seem to remember me for whatever reason. My dashing looks and athletic body perhaps :hehe: He also rang me once at home, years ago and probably regarding the red fiasco. Similarly, I once had a phone conversation with Keith (having never met him in person) and I remember my very positive impression of him even though it was probably two or three years ago.
I am not a member of any particular cohort and am happily ensconced in the bowels of Somerset away from the madding crowd.
I used to run the Cardiff City Exiles website a number of years ago (aiding City fans to share lifts and even meet up in ex-pat locations) - and I used to be contacted occasionally by a number of parties connected with the club as a result. His knowledge of me may come from that time. In passing, he has addressed me simply as 'Taunton'.
New one on there now "ex trust no trust" with a flounce about why they needed to leave. Keith isn't liked very much there at all, am I missing something? Forum wise seems to come across well and presents the figures in terms most of us can understand.
On the message boards it's like Jane Austen novels we have "Sense and Sensibility" counterbalanced by "Pride and Prejudice".
Both leading to "Persuasion"....
The CCS is "Northanger Abbey" before we play at "Mansfield Park"...
It has quite the feel of someone taking the general themes off of the message board and putting it into ChatGPT with the prompt of "write me a professional sounding letter based on x, y and z" because the use and style of language doesn't seem consistent with any previous user, just the content. You also have to ask the question as to why someone would create an account on that particular forum for the first time just to post that? So, whilst it looks like an existing user using AI then the identity of the author of that account is another question altogether!
The Trust board is democratically elected by its members and is recognised by football authorities.
Over there it's a cult and the Trust reduces their influence, not that they have had any since scam's time at the club and even then it was miniscule if not non-existent. This also explains why they want scam back.
Hello people and thanks for allowing me in, as it seems with a few others I am banished from that site, for basically speaking my truth which didn't align with a certain person's truth, if you know what I mean lol.
Some interesting stuff coming out now like ALL week " it's in Tans hands" but today it "Tans lawyers, etc ".
Nice to see a good few names that I remember from years back still on here too.
Those accounts and those posts always align with Mr Abrahams … wonder who could be behind them :hehe:
Well, I just signed back up after a 10+ year absence. My old membership lapsed after I moved to Australia and closed down my UK bank accounts.
This second paragraph of the message is not quite true in my opinion "...Trust was founded with the admirable aim of giving supporters a genuine voice in the club's decision-making process and strengthening the bond between Cardiff City and its community..."
The Trust was primarily set up due to the very real threat of Sam Hammam forcing the club into administration/liquidation and the existence of the official supporters Trust gave us the best chance of picking up the pieces in the aftermath of Hammam's reckless spending and governance of the club.
And speaking of governance, the newly created Football Governance Bill sets our own supporters trust as the prime candidate to represent all fans on the heritage items of the club (kit colours, badge changes etc). There has actually never been a more exciting time to be part of the Trust.
https://www.ccfctrust.org/join-the-trust-now/
:thumbup:
Yes, indeed. I did hear on the grapevine that the Department of Culture Media and Sport have arranged a meeting with the Trust. I think they will oversee the office of the Regulator. That should be an interesting conversation at the moment especially when the subject of fan consultation crops up which I’ve no doubt it will.
I bet lol Creoseo.
They said they were flying in and staying for 5 days, thats now not happening. But don't worry they aren't going anywhere. What happened to just needs Tan to sign?
We were always told by our parents
If it sounds too good to be true . You now the rest
7 pages criticising he who can’t usually be named and his forum and the absolute nonsense they are spouting and I get a post deleted on here calling one of their mods pompous and sycophantic?
Why? It is hardly abusive and it is undeniably accurate? The man uses bold and italics he thinks his opinion is that important!
Make your point without calling people pricks. There’s a reason I keep threads about the other board off here usually as it descends into name calling and gets quite childish. I felt this week the nature of the topic meant we needed to crossover.
You may have noticed from my Matlock post I’ve been away this week so have only been watching via mobile in the most part and have tried to allow everyone to make their points. I get home last night and your post is there calling people pricks. It wasn’t just ‘pompous and sycophantic’.
No you’re right, it wasn’t just pompous and sycophantic it was nauseating too, I don’t recall using the word prick at all because I know your very precious about upsetting he who shall not be named.
There you go, people accuse his board of being like North Korea but it’s just as bad on here.
This board is, and always has been, very well moderated and we have had "moments" over the years and whenever MM acts he does with good reason.
Sludge could call anyone what he wanted for a good 18 months - 2 years on here before Mike finally clipped his wings but whoa betide you call an **** moderator a prick, which I don’t even recall saying.
And as for moderating I’ve seen Matt delete posts he didn’t like slagging off his mate La Brute 🙄
Social media politics.
I didn't post for 10 years (i walked away from the club over the rebrand) but have been back on here and at the CCS for the last three years.
Like many I enjoy the banter / discussion / humour on here.
Posters come and go (many come back) but in this modern world of scrutiny and responsibility and complaints etc, moderating has to be taken seriously.
Let's be thankful this board still exists in the format it does.
I will get back under my rock now,