-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MacAdder
Just noticed now, she really does :hehe:
Wrighty has got the easiest fancy dress outfit ever, just puts a syrup on.
There's a photoshop doing the rounds, I'm not putting in on here, but it's funny.
Surprised you haven't seen it.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
So is Harry the one who supports Villa? I honestly don't know. The media have been full of a story that what I would call a sizeable minority in this country are not remotely interested in for days, shouldn't they at least spend some time reflecting the opinions of that minority?
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
So is Harry the one who supports Villa? I honestly don't know. The media have been full of a story that what I would call a sizeable minority in this country are not remotely interested in for days, shouldn't they at least spend some time reflecting the opinions of that minority?
No, it's William who supports Villa.
At the moment, wimp Haz, couldn't support anything.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUETIT
No, it's William who supports Villa.
:thumbup:
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Moodybluebird
My niece gave birth to a mixed race baby boy 2 years ago and she openly discussed the baby's skin colour with me and my wife. It was a point of interest to her that she wanted to talk about and we were happy to listen. I'm not defending the royals but we have no idea in what context the comment was made.
Thats totally different. She wanted to talk about it as a point of interest.
Questioning someone when they enter a relationship with a mixed race person have they considered the colour of their future baby is another.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hilts
Thats totally different. She wanted to talk about it as a point of interest.
Questioning someone when they enter a relationship with a mixed race person have they considered the colour of their future baby is another.
They can't say who and they got different stories of when it was supposed to have happened. !!!!
Why are gullible people being taken in by their bullshit.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUETIT
Why are gullible people being taken in by their bullshit.
the irony though
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
delmbox
the irony though
I know what you are trying to imply, but they have been caught out lying on 4 points already, without much effort. Anyone can find out why Archie can't be a prince (at the moment), she's seen her sister in the last 19 years, plus the money aspect.
If they have lied about simple things, why should anyone believe any of the other bullshit.
If they were making a "police statement", it would get torn to shreads
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Do you honestly believe the royals. Oh the irony Tony. The monarchy should have been gotten rid of years ago. They are a bunch of nutters.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ninian opinian
Do you honestly believe the royals. Oh the irony Tony. The monarchy should have been gotten rid of years ago. They are a bunch of nutters.
It's not about believing the royals, it's about our Megs statements being torn to shreds already, without a royal opening their gob.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUETIT
No, it's William who supports Villa.
At the moment, wimp Haz, couldn't support anything.
Oh no not another media interview for chaps who feel isolated without a footy club
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
This has become the latest polarising issue which has people rush to one side of the debate and become unwilling to budge or see other side's point of view.
Interesting article about why Archie isn't a Prince yet and may not become one: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56325934
Quote:
She referred in the interview to a "George V or George VI convention" that would mean her son Archie would become a prince "when Harry's dad becomes king".
But she went on to say that she had been told when she was pregnant that "they want to change the convention for Archie" so he would not become a prince.
"I saw that Meghan mentioned that there were plans to narrow eligibility and I imagine that this is a reference to the Prince of Wales's stated view that the size of the royal family needs to be reduced," said Bob Morris from the Constitution Unit at UCL.
Isn't that (a smaller and eventually non-existent royal family) what people want?
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
There are real human beings in the UK who have more hatred towards a pregnant woman because she's 'woke' and criticises the Royal family, than they have against politicians who've presided over 130,000 deaths and the worst economic recession in the western world.
Absolutely bonkers.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
surge
This has become the latest polarising issue which has people rush to one side of the debate and become unwilling to budge or see other side's point of view.
Interesting article about why Archie isn't a Prince yet and may not become one:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56325934
Isn't that (a smaller and eventually non-existent royal family) what people want?
Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY
https://www.republic.org.uk/petition
here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY
https://www.republic.org.uk/petition
here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.
No thanks
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY
https://www.republic.org.uk/petition
here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.
WHY ?
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ninian opinian
There are real human beings in the UK who have more hatred towards a pregnant woman because she's 'woke' and criticises the Royal family, than they have against politicians who've presided over 130,000 deaths and the worst economic recession in the western world.
Absolutely bonkers.
Always the same people who get pulled in by it too. Whipped up into a frenzy and staunchly defend it even though it doesn matter.
You can bet the venn diagram of people who hate harry and megan, also hate gary linekar for being paid to much at the bbc and lilly allen for having a spare bedroom is a ****ing circle.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
Yes, they should just narrow eligibility until it is only the people who should really be a prince - i.e. NOBODY
https://www.republic.org.uk/petition
here's a petition to get rid of the Royal family. Please consider signing it.
no thanks
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
delmbox
the irony though
I know ****ing hell :hehe:
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUETIT
WHY ?
Because it is fundamentally unfair as a society that the only people who can become the head of state are ones who have been pushed out of a royal vagina.
They are increasingly an embarrassment, out of touch, take a shitload of taxpayers money and live in palaces with hundreds of servants while mugs up and down the country cheer them on for it. I expect they are having a really good laugh at all the fools who are basically enabling the whole farce to continue.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
Because it is fundamentally unfair as a society that the only people who can become the head of state are ones who have been pushed out of a royal vagina.
They are increasingly an embarrassment, out of touch, take a shitload of taxpayers money and live in palaces with hundreds of servants while mugs up and down the country cheer them on for it. I expect they are having a really good laugh at all the fools who are basically enabling the whole farce to continue.
"They also bring in a lot to the economy though" people will argue.
Tourists would suddenly stop visiting royal castles and palaces if nobody resided in them, apparently. Sadly, nobody has visited visited Hampton Court in centuries because it's vacant.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
"They also bring in a lot to the economy though" people will argue.
Tourists would suddenly stop visiting royal castles and palaces if nobody resided in them, apparently. Sadly, nobody has visited visited Hampton Court in centuries because it's vacant.
I'm going when lockdown ends :wave:
And there is a wonderful Christmas Market/carol service put on there.
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Croesy Blue
I know ****ing hell :hehe:
Pray tell why, as I pointed out it's far from ironic, you happy little follow suiter :hehe:
Why haven't you got a mind/opinion of your own, to put forward, instead of following the braindead. :wave:
-
Re: Harry and Meghan interview
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
"They also bring in a lot to the economy though" people will argue.
Tourists would suddenly stop visiting royal castles and palaces if nobody resided in them, apparently. Sadly, nobody has visited visited Hampton Court in centuries because it's vacant.
More people go to Versailles every year than Buckingham palace. Remind me what they did with their Royal Family