Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Ta for that link. It opens with:-
- Matt Hancock wanted to “deploy” a new Covid variant to “frighten the pants off” the public and ensure they complied with lockdown, leaked messages seen by The Telegraph have revealed.
The Lockdown Files – more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages sent between ministers, officials and others – show how the Government used scare tactics to force compliance and push through lockdowns. -
But we can be sure someone who's unable or unwilling to comprehend simple English (AKA a Teletubby) will come along to insist Covid wasn't a contrived psy-op from the off and that the government and its ministers acted in good faith throughout.
We can be equally confident they were mug enough to volunteer for a Covid needle which was the primary objective of the entire caper that most seemingly still haven't cottoned on to.
I posted two links a few days back that detailed Pfizer's decades long history of lies and deceit. Those who rolled a sleeve up for something made by those charlatans must feel like kicking themselves.
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
Ta for that link
Attachment 5443
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
I think the WHO need to take over when the next pandemic hits.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Orwell's greatest warning from his novel 1984 was the state (government = govern mind) controlling the psychology of the population through fear.
For almost two years it, in alliance with corporate media, induced mass hysteria and psychological conformity.
The Edward Bernays propaganda schtick worked a treat.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
@ 40 seconds in the shorter second video. He says "amplify", I.e. cycle. He goes on to imply you can find whatever you desire to erroneously by over-cycling his PCR test, which as mentioned happened in Blighty when they ran it at 42 cycles whenever the prevailing narrative required more (fake) cases of Covid-19.
The Tanzanian president called BS in 2020 after a goat and some fruit tested positive for Covid-19. He was among a handful of leaders from black majority countries who refused to go along with the Covid hoax. He and they wound up brown bread within 18 months. The presidents of Haiti and Burundi were two of the others. The one leader of a white majority country who also said no is still with us although he, the president of Belarus, was almost toppled in a coup for not playing ball.
"...which as mentioned happened in Blighty when they ran it at 42 cycles whenever the prevailing narrative required more (fake) cases of Covid-19."
Can you provide a source for this wild claim?
"The presidents of Haiti and Burundi were two of the others [who ended up "brown bread"]
Yes, I remember this one. You said that the president of Haiti was assassinated so they could install a pro-vaccine shill. The new president wasn't pro-vaccine either though, was he? Like all of your claims, they turn out to be false.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
Ta for that link. It opens with:-
- Matt Hancock wanted to “deploy” a new Covid variant to “frighten the pants off” the public and ensure they complied with lockdown, leaked messages seen by The Telegraph have revealed.
The Lockdown Files – more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages sent between ministers, officials and others – show how the Government used scare tactics to force compliance and push through lockdowns. -
But we can be sure someone who's unable or unwilling to comprehend simple English (AKA a Teletubby) will come along to insist Covid wasn't a contrived psy-op from the off and that the government and its ministers acted in good faith throughout.
We can be equally confident they were mug enough to volunteer for a Covid needle which was the primary objective of the entire caper that most seemingly still haven't cottoned on to.
I posted two links a few days back that detailed Pfizer's decades long history of lies and deceit. Those who rolled a sleeve up for something made by those charlatans must feel like kicking themselves.
Of course they didn't act in good faith throughout. Anybody with a modicum of sense can recognise that.
I had the Oxford/Moderna vaccines - how does that fit with your Pfizer/Satanic narrative?
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I think the WHO need to take over when the next pandemic hits.
Who?
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
Orwell's greatest warning from his novel 1984 was the state (government = govern mind) controlling the psychology of the population through fear.
For almost two years it, in alliance with corporate media, induced mass hysteria and psychological conformity.
The Edward Bernays propaganda schtick worked a treat.
You're terrified of everything because you watch endless YouTube videos, for God's sake :hehe:
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
You're terrified of everything because you watch endless YouTube videos, for God's sake :hehe:
PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives. Apparently Matt Hancock was testing twice a week.��
That’s was the issue with the PCR test , too many false positives, which became a casedemic
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives. Apparently Matt Hancock was testing twice a week.��
That’s was the issue with the PCR test , too many false positives, which became a casedemic
Where's the source for that? I've used that quote: "PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives." to try to find a source for it and I'm not getting any hits.
Thanks.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
The thing is this is not new information… but I can get a link
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1411/rr
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
I don't know whether it's new or old information as I can't find the information anywhere other than what has been presented as fact on here.
Even now, the link you have just shared is about lateral flow tests - not PCR tests - which is what you and Organ Morgan have said were flawed.
Do you have any sources to back up the quote "PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives"?
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
He's an absolute ghoul. I hope he sees the inside of a cell in the near future.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Apologies, the article does go into PCRs as well as LFTs.
"Not as accurate as previously thought" is the determination from the person who submitted that article to BMJ.
Nothing in there about "40-45 cycling" and 97% false positives though, as far as I can see.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
I don't know whether it's new or old information as I can't find the information anywhere other than what has been presented as fact on here.
Even now, the link you have just shared is about lateral flow tests - not PCR tests - which is what you and Organ Morgan have said were flawed.
Do you have any sources to back up the quote "PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives"?
https://rumble.com/vd70ip-world-heal...ielded-to.html
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...453-7/fulltext
Lancet study
0.8 % - 4%
That could be a large number when testing 300k per day
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
An interesting read about numerous issues that PCR testing could face but, nonetheless, there's absolutely nothing (again) relating to "PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives".
You couldn't have just plucked those figures from thin air so if you can remember where you got them from, I'd love to be educated on it.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
An interesting read about numerous issues that PCR testing could face but, nonetheless, there's absolutely nothing (again) relating to "PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives".
You couldn't have just plucked those figures from thin air so if you can remember where you got them from, I'd love to be educated on it.
This article explains it a bit better
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...t-b550133.html
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
I accept that there is a scope for error. I'm not saying that there isn't.
But 0.8%-4% is a little bit short of the 97% false positives that have been bandied about for the last few pages without any evidence.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
You're terrified of everything because you watch endless YouTube videos, for God's sake :hehe:
You'd be hiding under the bed before you could say H1N1.
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tito Fuente
I accept that there is a scope for error. I'm not saying that there isn't.
But 0.8%-4% is a little bit short of the 97% false positives that have been bandied about for the last few pages without any evidence.
I think the high percentage error rate is apparently when a person can test positive two or three months after the initial infection, when they are basically asymptomatic and no risk at all.
No doubt the Covid Files will cover this in due course
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
You'd be hiding under the bed before you could say H1N1.
Hiding :sherlock:
Hi D ing :sherlock: :sherlock:
Hi D :sherlock: :sherlock: :sherlock:
Re: Effective Covid Measures Implemented
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
I think the high percentage error rate is apparently when a person can test positive two or three months after the initial infection, when they are basically asymptomatic and no risk at all.
No doubt the Covid Files will cover this in due course
I can't speak to that. It's interesting though - so if you can give a source for that then I'd definitely give it a read.
All I'd really like to see sometime this side of Christmas is evidence of " PCR Pandemic: Ramp up PCR 'test' to 40-45 cycle yielding 97% false positives".
