Rebuffed - Sala Insurance arguments

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MacAdder

My word you have such an inflated opinion of yourself.

---

This comment is kind of ironic considering it’s you who seems to believe my posts are important enough to get upset about on a very regular basis. And don’t think you’ll fool anyone with your cyber bullying nonsense. That’s a really cowardly claim, but it’s par for the course where you’re concerned.

The truth is that you take umbrage with pretty much everything I post regardless of the subject, and you’ve been supplying your outraged responses on a continual basis for years. The bad news for you is that, while you apparently care deeply about what I say, I genuinely couldn’t care less what you think. I just reckon you’re an oddball. You’d have to be to take strangers’ opinions about a football club so seriously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish

Tan is a 'serious' businessman, and I doubt he would pursue a vexatious action without consulting lawyers..

---

On what evidence from his time at city would you base this assertion on?

Not looking to argue just genuinely interested. As much as I think it would be good to have change now I don’t dislike tan and am grateful to some extent. But the things I’d be grateful for are the opposite of what a serious businessman would do

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman

This comment is kind of ironic considering it’s you who seems to believe my posts are important enough to get upset about on a very regular basis.

---

Irony LOL. It is you who seem to be upset, with me telling it as it is.

"Very regular basis" I don't think so, just those posts I can be arsed to reply to. There could be so many more :hehe:

You will notice that I have employed your trick here, cutting and pasting a sample of a post choosing to ignore the rest, usually the points that matter.
My reasoning tho, I refuse to stoop to name calling.

I'm off now to try and enjoy my weekend without obsessing over you.