Erm it was in relation to the one sided view of Russia , and as you always say, try and read the whole conversation, otherwise you confuse posters trying to add to the ongoing discussion- there’s a good ladQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Printable View
Erm it was in relation to the one sided view of Russia , and as you always say, try and read the whole conversation, otherwise you confuse posters trying to add to the ongoing discussion- there’s a good ladQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
"and as you always say" wtf :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
I'm giving the whole conversation a read, correct me if I've not got the gist of it.
Nelson asked why no one was pursuing peace and Cyril gave reasons why neither Russia nor Ukraine were backing down. You took that as a one-sided view of Russia and decided to challenge Cyril about his views on war criminals of decades past and the Iraq war of 20 years ago but would rather not discuss historical incidents and want to stay on the recent conflict in Ukraine because it gets confusing when different subjects are discussed in the same headline.
Have I got that right?
as I’ve said it may have better to have started a different thread ( although it could be argued that you had a motive behind your reply to me , just like one or two who consistently continue to do so ) that said it was only a suggestion wasn’t it. This thread is now getting sidetracked as I initially said it would - hope that helpsQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Crikey, you start a thread specifically on the Ukraine war quoting fictitious casualty figures then chip into a reply/OpInIOn (delete as appropriate) I gave Nels dragging up a completely left field reference to the perceived behaviour of US Presidents from around the time you claim to have been born that had nothing to do with my reply. Then try to get sniffy that the thread is being sidetracked as you predicted.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
I think you have disappeared so far through the tunnel of irony on this that you have long since adjusted your eyes to the sunlight on the other side.
Feeling better today hun ?Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Your stupidity is always a tonic, so very few bad days for a while.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
You’re *Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
You are stupidity?Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
It's your stupidity. That is, as you are only too willing to demonstrate, the stupidity belongs to you!
I guess the way you keep trying to hurl insults is more a reflection of you isn’t it…. It’s hilarious , I’d up the dosage if I were youQuote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
You're* funny!Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Please be more forgiving of our Cyril.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Here's an example of what he taps a foot to at youtube. Aww.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzyS79eEgPs
:hehe: :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Have another swing!
Play fair, he was only stating an opinion on the correct grammar usage, ffs !Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
There's no space before an exclamation mark. That's the first time I've seen you commit that error. Lardy excluded a full stop at an end of a paragraph yesterday. Also a first.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
What's going on in your family, Munchkinitis?
You know, Morg. Since you mentioned it I noticed a while back that the user ids RonnieBird, TWGL1 and pipster all make that same grammatical mistake with question and exclamation marks, unfailingly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
I must have a accidently copied that habit ! :sherlock:
My word I must be living in your head rent free :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
You're *Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
:facepalm:Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
:facepalm:indeed, though you may want to read a bit more of the thread that led to my post before drawing too many conclusions!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
It was a typo which I could have quite easily amended but decided to leave it as I knew what your childish reactions would be. I’m led to believe you’re a pensioner (which is why I feel obliged to give you and one or two others a “free pass”,) so act your age please and don’t get above your station.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
A typo? You sent a post specifically correcting my use of "your" stating it should be "You're".Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Feel free to carry on being an idiot about a pompous schoolboy error that backfired on you though!
Considering how dumb you think I am you don’t half reply to a lot of my posts , as I say it’s hilarious seeing you get wound up and fishing for bites.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
The irony of you asking why I hadn't posted when I was in Croatia was obviously lost on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Anyway, any time you want to have some fun winding me up by stupidly thinking you were clever correcting grammar then fill your boots!
Been doing some :sherlock:-ing about this and it appears to be legit. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Leaked phonecall: Russian officials call Putin satan and dwarf <a href="https://t.co/5EdYonxiHh">pic.twitter.com/5EdYonxiHh</a></p>— أبانوب سامي (@AbanoubSamy1293) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbanoubSamy1293/status/1640761890598002694?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Is the New World Disorder crew about to open a second front to add to Ukraine/NATO versus Russia and friends ding-dong via the Chinese navy reportedly about to encircle and blockade the island of Taiwan?
Military holds patrols, exercises around Taiwan Island - https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/2023...47ebb8fc8.html
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chinese military to hold combat alert patrol, joint exercise “encircling island of Taiwan from Sat to Mon” : media</p>— Apex (@Apex_WW) <a href="https://twitter.com/Apex_WW/status/1644502652775018500?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I don’t like where this is headed… <a href="https://t.co/7DRTuyasJ5">https://t.co/7DRTuyasJ5</a></p>— Ian Ellis (@ianellisjones) <a href="https://twitter.com/ianellisjones/status/1644509277107769344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKI NG</a> Taiwan detects eight Chinese warships and 42 fighter jets around the island: defence ministry <a href="https://t.co/A3mGVROEJW">pic.twitter.com/A3mGVROEJW</a></p>— AFP News Agency (@AFP) <a href="https://twitter.com/AFP/status/1644552186955984898?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I see this article is now the top news at the BBC's website.
China simulates hitting 'key targets' on Taiwan - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-65223970
It's not mentioned in that but elsewhere it is being reported the US has dispatched one of its aircraft carriers to that area.
:sherlock: The vessel in the foreground is flying a China and Russia flag.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chinese Eastern Theater Command is continuing to conduct Naval and Air Exercises on the "Encirclement" of the Taiwanese Islands while also launching Strikes against "Mock Targets" that are meant to represent Key Military and Infrastructure Facilities across Taiwan. <a href="https://t.co/uVxWsfcOO3">pic.twitter.com/uVxWsfcOO3</a></p>— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) <a href="https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1644933368331526146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
That might be because the photo is six months old from a joint Chinese and Russian exerciseQuote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202209/1274406.shtml
Ever tried "doing your own research" on things you post? :hehe:
Or even this one from 2021. It's almost like they rehearse the same pose each time they go on exercise.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/2021...39bc70cf3.html
It's a bit early but I think The Dupe of the Day Award is already in the bag!
Dupe of the Day. :hehe:
The Yank aircraft carrier supposedly steaming there in a hurry has a complement of 100 warplanes and a crew of 6,000.
Oh so is WW3 starting this month? I thought it was supposed to be last month, or the month before that, or the month before that, or the….. and so on.
Trumpton posted a brief, intriguing message yesterday. Presumably it was related to Taiwan.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Donald Trump made this disturbing post on his social media app Truth Social: <br><br>“WORLD WAR III” <a href="https://t.co/WoeN6c0DJj">pic.twitter.com/WoeN6c0DJj</a></p>— Daily Loud (@DailyLoud) <a href="https://twitter.com/DailyLoud/status/1645192289478737920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canton Kev
Drip , Drip , Drip
Special forces (According to the files, US officials assessed at the time that of the 97 special forces from Nato countries active in Ukraine, 50 were British. This is considerably higher than the number from the US and France, which were said to have deployed 14 and 15 special forces respectively) have been on the ground in Ukraine wonder who else is in there
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-leak-suggests
Why do person/people who start silly posts keep on returning to those posts to continue to highlight their initial silliness and additional hole digging contributions? It's almost like they are looking for some vindication for their initial stupidity that only they can see!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
I’d prefer to have my opinion than someone like you, who is compliant , obedient, and unquestioning (and weird)
It looks like the dancefloor is free. Given you started this thread with some nonsensical stats you couldn't support, diverted away from your nonsense by dragging Jimmy Carter and the Yemen into the discussion, from nowhere. What is your opinion so the people that support it and don't can discuss?Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Nonsensical stats ….. they could be ( as I originally said) but it’s highly subjective when you think most of the info we get is from Ukrainian intelligence… supported by western media outlets.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Already, the fact that a “leaked report” is stating fellow NATO member states Latvia, France, and the Netherlands had special operatives in Ukraine respectively, as well as US troops suggests that perhaps the initial thread has some truth contained in it. The U.K. had the largest contingent of special forces in the country, the BBC reported, with 50 troops on the ground. ( my guess is that those figures are probably higher)
What the agenda change over the next few months.
So you think that intelligence reports of 90 NATO special forces being in the Ukraine make your nonsensical stats of 234 NATO military trainers and 2458 NATO soldiers being killed in your OP, highly subjective rather than absolute bullshit?Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
As I said they could be , but I suspect the troop losses are probably higher on both sides if American officials who coincidentally more circumspect in describing Ukrainian losses, ( why would that be ) have stated in the leaked document that as of February, Ukraine had suffered 124,500 to 131,000 casualties.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
It’s worth noting that NATO troops have been in Ukraine since 2014 and Canada have been in there since 2015.
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-...n-unifier.html
Thanks for clarifying that you think the Ukraine war is underplaying the loss of nearly 3k NATO troops. Madness!Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1