I don't recall specifically saying you did. If it bothers you so much show me my post.Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Printable View
I don't recall specifically saying you did. If it bothers you so much show me my post.Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Actually I should have said Yes - it was not me who questioned professors.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
So it was you. good!Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
So, what is the point you are making. Are you even sure anymore?Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
I'm not making any point, its you that's banging on about it, but can you show me the post where I said that you said it?Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Proof that you don't read anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
I'll repeat it again,
Actually I should have said Yes - it was not me who questioned professors. The way you worded the question meant I should have answered in the affirmative.
I actually said, "Was it not you?" And the answer should be "No it was not" or "yes it was" you just confirmed it was. I person with your intelligence should be able to understand the English language to that degree. (Excuse the pun(Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
That's why I am seeking clarification because you struggle for clarity. It took a long time, but eventually you cleared it up. Thanks for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
"Was it not you?"Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
"Yes" - therefore it was not me. Either way, it was not me however desperately you are trying to claim it was.
Of course, the correct and clear way to ask would have been "Was it you?".
Yrasp of the English language appears to be slipping. There is nothing grammatically wrong with "Was it not you?" and the answer to that question should be "Yes it was" or "No it wasn't" You said yes, which infers it was. If you don't accept that please go and check.
However the question was with regard to you claiming I had said that you said that Chamberlain's statement was "Universally acclaimed". I have asked you to show me the thread where I said that but you keep changing the subject. If I said it show me. If you don't I suppose we can safely assume I didn't say it.
Did you stop at the word yes?Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
" Yes - it was not me who questioned professors."
With regards to your second paragraph, you were completely unclear in what point you were making. You have since conceded you weren't making any point at all - probably just arguing with me for the sake of arguing with me. Anyway, you have cleared that one up so, obviously, I cannot show you a post where you said it. I can, if you wish, show you the post that made me seek clarity.
But the answer should have been, "No, it was not me......."Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Regarding my post can I take that as a 'no' then? lol
I did answer originally no.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Anyway, I think it was WalesBales who made that claim, not me. Is this the other persona you claim I have? In which case, I'd like you to prove I am WalesBales - considering your new found admiration of facts.
I don't think you are Wales Bales and i never claimed such a thing. If I had I'd have claimed my 5 pounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Sorry, you were alluding to me knowing you as another persona, so I guess you probably weren't making a point then either.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Not another, others lolQuote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Wow, so this accusation is now extending to me having multiple personas. In the interest of your new found love of facts, you won't mind if I challenge you to provide some facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Its not extending to multiple, it always was multiples but there is no point in mentioning anything because you will simply deny it. But I and several others know. At least you're loyal to your own brief!!Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Hmmm, no facts there.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Me thinks thou does't pro! lmaotest too muchQuote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Was there a Welsh government briefing today? I cannot find any report or reference to one.
No, they are weekly I believe.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Not sure what that says.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
don't worry about it, it was just a typo, and you will deny everything lolQuote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Obviously I will deny accusations that are untrue. It would be silly not to, but here it seems to be an admission of guilt. Oh, I forgot to add lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by xsnaggle
Just came back to this thread to see what's new. Nothing it seems. Maybe it ought to be renamed the CCFC3P0/xsnaggle bitching update. Give it a rest for heaven's sake.
With the utmost respect, there are probably more reliable sources to get your coronavirus information from than a football message board. But, I take your comments on board.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gofer Blue
Are you joking? There’s some top scientists on here is there not? Let’s not forget Professor hberg who knows it all...Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
A few days old now, but this article is worth a read;-
https://www.channel4.com/news/factch...re-of-covid-19
I have noticed, on the ZOE application and website, that areas in and around South Wales are turning a deeper pink, suggesting an infection rate rising above 1%. This is based on people completing a surveyQuote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
https://covid.joinzoe.com/data
That URL doesn't force you to join btw, nor ask for details.
I'm shocked its once a week I thought it would be yearly in this nirvana like Welsh assembly socialist stay at home public lockdown holiday .Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
The daily Conservative ones tend to be Party Political Broadcasts these days. The PM rarely shows up but, based on his performance yesterday, I can understand why they put the slightly less incompetent Grant Shapps and Priti Patel on there instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="7326428" data-share-method="host" data-width="100%" data-aspect-ratio="1.3333333333333333"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/goddamnright-heisenberg-gif-7326428">Goddamnright Heisenberg GIF</a> from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/goddamnright-gifs">Goddamnright GIFs</a></div><script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>Quote:
Originally Posted by goats
Johnson, "the R has not risen above one " - interesting choice of words, would I be right to add but it has gone up to that I wonder?
They are daily on Monday to Friday.Quote:
Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO
Can't recall seeing them at the weekend
Johnnson 'waffle waffle waffle the most important thing is to wash your hands'
He must be using the info from last Friday because they only get the update on a Friday.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
more to the point it lags 2 -3 weeks behind so it doesn't apply to since they relaxed things anyway. The new one of Friday might, just!!
Retail to open in England on June 15....the bridge is going to be busy going east for some essentials, no doubt it will be a few more months before wales wakes up, if it ever does
Yes Daily, but not today. Mr Drakeford must have been busy on his allotment. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Elwood Blues
In my opinion, a national R rate is not a great method of recording what is happening. It needs to be at a more regional level.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson