Emre racially abusing Didier Zokora and getting what was coming to him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

As I said, maybe, maybe not mob mentality but it is certainly no coincidence that the same three or four posters get involved in the majority of the spats on here.

---

I need to go and lie down to fully absorb the irony here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

I need to go and lie down to fully absorb the irony here.

---

Rest well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

There is absolutely no excuse for a man to hit a woman.

Now a woman getting into a fight with another woman, well you bring the mud-filled paddling pool, I'll bring the beer

---

:hehe:

looking at the video, those were not just hard challenges but designed to injure a person,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Philbccfc

looking at the video, those were not just hard challenges but designed to injure a person,

---

With the exception of the last, the others are similar challenges to those you see in a lot of niggly games.

Racist gets hard tackles. Eh... whatever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Philbccfc

Not having read all the thread but it seems vigilante justice is the way forward for some, totally ignoring the rule of law.

---

It seems that way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

There is absolutely no excuse for a man to hit a woman.

Now a woman getting into a fight with another woman, well you bring the mud-filled paddling pool, I'll bring the beer

---

:hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

No it’s not mob mentality, it seems to me to be a number of people with a common viewpoint and or or two with a different viewpoint.

If I disagree with the colonel (who I have a lot of time for btw) should I keep schtum I case I get accused of being part of some mob?

What’s your opinion on the subject of the debate btw?

---

My view? If any of those tackles were considered to be assaults then I'm sure the referee would have dealt with them as such and sent the perpetrators off. Not sure any were sent off were they?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ccfc_is_my_life

With the exception of the last, the others are similar challenges to those you see in a lot of niggly games.

Racist gets hard tackles. Eh... whatever.

---

Indeed , no sympathy for him , it was only the last tackle that was a naughty one ......for the rest he was play acting like a fecking baby

At the end of the day real life is about free choice and responsibility

He used racist abuse and ended up having a clattering right in the nuts

If he had kept his mouth shut , then this incident wouldn't even be up for discussion

At the end of the day people can say what they want but if they end up getting a kicking then that's the way it goes , if the person who responds to abuse gets a fine or prison for assault that, again , is the way it goes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY

Indeed , no sympathy for him , it was only the last tackle that was a naughty one ......for the rest he was play acting like a fecking baby

At the end of the day real life is about free choice and responsibility

He used racist abuse and ended up having a clattering right in the nuts

If he had kept his mouth shut , then this incident wouldn't even be up for discussion

At the end of the day people can say what they want but if they end up getting a kicking then that's the way it goes , if the person who responds to abuse gets a fine or prison for assault that, again , is the way it goes

---

Good post. Why wouldn't you say something that coherent in the first place instead of all that angry mumbo-jumbo you spouted last night?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi

Good post. Why wouldn't you say something that coherent in the first place instead of all that angry mumbo-jumbo you spouted last night?

---

What angry mumbo jumbo ?

In my opinion you were talking nonsense and argueing just for the sake of it

If someone is prepared to hurl racist abuse then they need to understand that the person on the end of that racist abuse might react in an agressive and sometimes violent way

That's life I am afraid

Best to look after your arse and keep quiet in the first place , it's the best option

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

As I said, maybe, maybe not mob mentality but it is certainly no coincidence that the same three or four posters get involved in the majority of the spats on here.

---

I get involved in threads in general.

Nobody (questionable) posts a first reply on a thread with the intention of arguing, takes 2 to tango as they say, differing opinions should never end up going the way this has.

A side point to Nelson, mob mentality would be a mob of people together berating a poster, this thread has separate posters individually replying to the colonel.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

I'm asking if the same would apply to me? I'm pretty sure he would say there is no excuse to hit a woman so to me that would be VIOLENCE WHEN IT SUITS, it's as simple as that.

---

Until he answers the question, we are only guessing - I guess.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Philbccfc

looking at the video, those were not just hard challenges but designed to injure a person,

---

Seen a few like that Monday wolves v brum.

Last one was the only one that was as you state.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

My view? If any of those tackles were considered to be assaults then I'm sure the referee would have dealt with them as such and sent the perpetrators off. Not sure any were sent off were they?

---

Last one got a yellow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StraightOuttaCanton

Your psychological profiling in the first 3 paragraphs feel really accurate to me.

Just my interpretation, but it feels to me that the lone wolf in this thread has little or no appreciation of the effects of mental health issues

I’ve encountered more devastating effects on lives from words (bullying,prejudice etc) than I ever have from violence. Maybe it’s juat that violence gets a higher profile.

---

I have too. CC is the sort of bloke who would happily name call (from the safety of his bedroom in most cases), and then cry foul if someone decked him. If someone called me a tw@t, a ****, a faggot (funnily CC has called me all of those things, yet cries about insults in this very thread!) I would not look to retaliate violently. However, if I called someone some of those things, and they felt the only response was to kick me in the nuts, I don't think I'd have any complaints. I wouldn't deem the response appropriate, but the fact I have deliberately angered a person and lit the paper means I'd have very little moral ground on which to stand.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badly Ironed Shirt

Until he answers the question, we are only guessing - I guess.

---

Well if you were stupid enough to call a black bloke a nggr and were hit either by him or his black or white girlfriend or wife then I am afraid that's real life wether it's acceptable or not goes out the window , you have commited a racially motivated public order offence and he or she has assaulted you in response to that

It's up to the police and courts to deciede what is and what isn't acceptable

If you can up to the police and said a black man or black woman just punched me in the face because I called him a ****** I reckon they wouldn't treat it as the crime of the century

That's my view , I am not black , I don't go around hitting women but if I was black and someone racially abused me I don't know how I would react to what is extreme provocation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

My view? If any of those tackles were considered to be assaults then I'm sure the referee would have dealt with them as such and sent the perpetrators off. Not sure any were sent off were they?

---

The last one drew a yellow card.

Welcome to the mob btw

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

The last one drew a yellow card.

Welcome to the mob btw

---

I am aware of the yellow now - Another poster kindly pointed that out earlier.

Your second comment I find quite strange to be honest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY

Well if you were stupid enough to call a black bloke a nggr and were hit either by him or his black or white girlfriend or wife then I am afraid that's real life wether it's acceptable or not goes out the window , you have commited a racially motivated public order offence and he or she has assaulted you in response to that

It's up to the police and courts to deciede what is and what isn't acceptable

If you can up to the police and said a black man or black woman just punched me in the face because I called him a ****** I reckon they wouldn't treat it as the crime of the century

That's my view , I am not black , I don't go around hitting women but if I was black and someone racially abused me I don't know how I would react to what is extreme provocation

---

Your last point is the most pertinent. We are not black, we cannot truly understand the anger that the N word generates for many in the black community. I know people will now allude that my claim means that "White people can't get offended", but the truth is there is no term for labelling a white person that carries the connotations, history nor significance of the N word to the black community.

And, yes, the police would most likely approach such a scenario by asking if the racist wanted to press charges, bearing in mind that the police would then have to press charges for the racially motivated public order offence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badly Ironed Shirt

I have too. CC is the sort of bloke who would happily name call (from the safety of his bedroom in most cases), and then cry foul if someone decked him. If someone called me a tw@t, a ****, a faggot (funnily CC has called me all of those things, yet cries about insults in this very thread!) I would not look to retaliate violently. However, if I called someone some of those things, and they felt the only response was to kick me in the nuts, I don't think I'd have any complaints. I wouldn't deem the response appropriate, but the fact I have deliberately angered a person and lit the paper means I'd have very little moral ground on which to stand.

---

Well reasoned

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

I am aware of the yellow now - Another poster kindly pointed that out earlier.

Your second comment I find quite strange to be honest.

---

Where are your manners? Where is my thank you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

I am aware of the yellow now - Another poster kindly pointed that out earlier.

Your second comment I find quite strange to be honest.

---

Way back a few pages I did point out that it drew a yellow.

“Welcome to the mob” is a nod to the fact that your opinion of said incidents appears to be consistent with that of what may not not be considered a mob.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

Way back a few pages I did point out that it drew a yellow.

“Welcome to the mob” is a nod to the fact that your opinion of said incidents appears to be consistent with that of what may not not be considered a mob.

---

My sincere apologies - I have not been through the thread in full and had missed you pointing out it was a yellow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dembethewarrior

Where are your manners? Where is my thank you?

---

Possibly because I was first to mention the yellow card on page feckin two!!
:hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badly Ironed Shirt

I have too. CC is the sort of bloke who would happily name call (from the safety of his bedroom in most cases), and then cry foul if someone decked him. If someone called me a tw@t, a ****, a faggot (funnily CC has called me all of those things, yet cries about insults in this very thread!) I would not look to retaliate violently. However, if I called someone some of those things, and they felt the only response was to kick me in the nuts, I don't think I'd have any complaints. I wouldn't deem the response appropriate, but the fact I have deliberately angered a person and lit the paper means I'd have very little moral ground on which to stand.

---

He has form for it.
Loves to Dish it out.
Whines like a Baby if he gets it back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

Possibly because I was first to mention the yellow card on page feckin two!!
:hehe:

---

Watch it sonny. No stealing my thunder. He states above he dodnt see your post..

:hehe:

Nick won't thank me though.

He's awful stubborn.

His posting etiquette states that he will insist raucheously a poster remove their slanderous post about his persona, but he won't apologise, cos it's me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by James fox

He has form for it.
Loves to Dish it out.
Whines like a Baby if he gets it back.

---

Sad to say that is my experience too. Very odd fellow indeed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badly Ironed Shirt

Sad to say that is my experience too. Very odd fellow indeed.

---

All Attention is Good Attention to him.
He just Loves Attention.
Why?.
Maybe Something from his Childhood?.

Instead of “sticks and stones may break my bones....” I have a new rhyme for virtue signallers, social justice warriors and snowflakes!

Slurs and names will hurt my brain
Free speech is fascist thought crime

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by James fox

All Attention is Good Attention to him.
He just Loves Attention.
Why?.
Maybe Something from his Childhood?.

---

I think the colonel’s gone off on one a bit here, but I don’t think personal attacks are justified.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

My sincere apologies - I have not been through the thread in full and had missed you pointing out it was a yellow.

---

Once you've read the full thread I'm sure you will have a different opinion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by James fox

He has form for it.
Loves to Dish it out.
Whines like a Baby if he gets it back.

---

:hehe: What a load of rubbish, I don't think he is bothered at all by the name calling, if someone calls you something instead of responding to what you have said then you are going to mention it aren't you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

:hehe: What a load of rubbish, I don't think he is bothered at all by the name calling, if someone calls you something instead of responding to what you have said then you are going to mention it aren't you?

---

You're right, he isn't bothered. Which may explain why he can't comprehend how anyone else could possibly be affected by such abuse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badly Ironed Shirt

You're right, he isn't bothered. Which may explain why he can't comprehend how anyone else could possibly be affected by such abuse.

---

Do you get upset by people on here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamieccfc

Once you've read the full thread I'm sure you will have a different opinion

---

Different opinion of what?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dembethewarrior

Where are your manners? Where is my thank you?

---

Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TH63

I think the colonel’s gone off on one a bit here, but I don’t think personal attacks are justified.

---

They're not. But, he's holding a shit load of stones, and he's sat in a big glasshouse. I've seen him go off on an almighty insult laden rant on more than one occasion. It is amusing, but it's not as amusing as him trying to take the moral high ground for being insulted in this thread. The guy lacks self-awareness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

Do you get upset by people on here?

---

Not at all. Doesn't mean that I can't sympathise with people who do get upset by people on here, does it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nick

Different opinion of what?

---

Of the apparent mob squad

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamieccfc

Of the apparent mob squad

---

No.

CC can be his own worse enemy, however, NelsonCA61 was quite right about the mob mentality on this board. The same mob mentality that was shown on the recently cleansed Rita Ora thread. Same people, same mob mentality just a different poster that time.