Printable View
I don’t think anyone is saying that we should be welcoming her home and throwing a big **** off party for her. Just that we can’t shirk our responsibilities onto some other country. Why should they take her when she is a citizen of this country. Bring her home and deal with her properly.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
It's been great on here lately. We've had experts in Bangladeshi immigration laws, crash investigation experts, English channel tidal experts, the lot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Cartman
Seriously?Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
Well it was always said anyone cpuld get an answer to a question on here. Just the questions got a tad trickier lol :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by ken smith
9 pages of arguing and he still hasn’t grasped it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
My personal opinion is anyone who is involved in terrorist activities deserves the death pelanty :shrug:
Aw c’mon, have a Heart Son 😜Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
����Quote:
Originally Posted by splott parker
Out of interest, where have i said anyone has sympathy for this girl ? ? ? i haventQuote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
many would disagree that it is good news that the government is able to do this, as i said, its a big bold move, something i never thought they would do
Oh I get it, i just do not agree with you, dont confuse the twoQuote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
In fairness posting this shows you don’t know what people are talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
No, but i took your post as a bit tongue in cheek, so joined inQuote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
I don't know how you got 'tongue in cheek' from my post (a link to Bangladeshi officials stating that Begum isn't a civilian and won't be allowed to enter the country)... but o...k....Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
O....k.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
the post you quoted and replied to me
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Immediately wondering how many of those organisations benefit from the weapons our Government sells....Quote:
Originally Posted by Llandaff Blue
That's our Government ****ed, then.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
:thumbup: although you’re not allowed to say thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee
Apologies, my mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
:hehe: :hehe: I know, one poster told me that i need to learn how to decipher information from google, like he does-Basically, just find the info that suits your argument-This thread has been brilliant, some top class piss taking, some of the reply's have had me laughing.Quote:
Originally Posted by ken smith
We had windrush recently. That could easily happen again, but with added teeth.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
Governments operating outside of the law is not a good thing.
Okay , if she comes home, who wants to put her up and care for her and her child for the next 50 to 60 years, just leave your details In a post .
That’s why I pay my tax, so dangerous criminals are monitored so I can be kept safe :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
no worries :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Yes of course we did, and we all agree that was wrong, but while it could easily happen again ? ? ( though the day and age of them finding it easy to abuse power must have gone, as the people are alot more connected ) it might not and imho if we take this incident alone and treat it as a one-off, then the government has done the right thing, which is follow the opinion of the mass's ( for once )Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
You have to be joking hereQuote:
though the day and age of them finding it easy to abuse power must have gone, as the people are alot more connected
If there was a profession for missing the point you’d be the CEO, the whole point of this discussion is you cannot just take a situation as a one off.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
One thing she probably hasn’t factored in is how long she will actually last either in a uk prison or in the country.
I’m sure there are plenty lining up to martyr her.
Has she been involved in terrorist activities?Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
The day and age of it being easy to abuse power must have gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
And you're totally sure you're not naive?
Simple question, “Would you want her living next door to you” ?????Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
Question not directed to you personally, but to anyone !!!
In any case, let’s say Matt is right and this is a one of and the government don’t abuse the use of this. Is it right for us to send a terrorist out into another country and washing our hands of her?
Is that fair to do that to Bangladesh, the Netherlands or any other country? Isn’t our role in this to protect the rest of the world?
I think that depends on your definition of involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
If you include keeping up the morale (and keeping other things up) of terrorists then yes she is involved. If you mean hands on dirty work then we, the public, don't know.
Ah yes can’t wait for the true moral guardians of the U.K., *checks notes* people in high security prisons for murder, to hand out some justice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toadstool
Yes that'll teach her for being brainwashed as a childQuote:
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
But there will be many that see it as justified.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
Can we deport those people?Quote:
Originally Posted by rs3100
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47313657
'Hoda Muthana: Trump says IS woman barred from US return'
Similar case occurring in the States now.
This tickled me, and got me thinking - are there any recent examples of the government abusing its power (or attempting to) or are those days in the past thanks to Twitter?Quote:
Originally Posted by blue matt
I thought of the Gina Miller court case where the government wanted to exercise article 50 without parliament's approval, and the government paying £1bn of taxpayer money to the DUP to get enough seats to 'win' the election. The ferry contract to a company with no ferries seems to have a few question marks over it. Any other recent ones?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...iminal-offenceQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
The government taking the referendum as minding despite one of its biggest backers being illegally funded. Deporting windrush citizens then arresting those who protested against it on terrorist offences. Theresa May being best pals with Paul Darce and Aaron Banks and refusing to investigate LeaveEU because of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy