I'm not in England and England seems to have different rules although it seems like they don't know what their own rules are over there, judging by that Cummings guy, lol.
Printable View
I'm not in England and England seems to have different rules although it seems like they don't know what their own rules are over there, judging by that Cummings guy, lol.
Dramatic findings in this poll. It can't be good news, but the politicians, especially the UK Government, have brought it on themselves;-
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-falls-sharply
Does it matter though? As long as we have faith in those who know their stuff, ie the scientists, public health etc I’m ok with that like most people it would appear. Who the f bomb trust a politician anyway? I dont care what colour tie they wear.....
Just some positive news from down under: https://amp.theguardian.com/world/20...mpression=true
Why all this fuss about new arrivals to the UK having to go into 14 days quarantine? Why would anyone want/need to come to the UK at the moment unless they are UK citizens returning home? If they are eastern Europeans coming to help harvest fruit & veg I'm sure they would oblige.
Or would they still want to come when you think about it!
Why business trips when we have all these video conferencing gizmos? Anyone coming to the UK for a holiday must be slightly unhinged surely, as (a) we now have the highest per capita COVID death rate in the world* and (b) they will need to be quarantined for the first 2 weeks.
(*source: https://www.businessinsider.com/uk-h...20-5?r=US&IR=T)
The airbridges deal with (b) they will remove the 14 day quarintine for countries with low covid levels.
I agree people won't be rushing back here that's I assume why flights won't be back up to their normal number for a long time. But things will have to be eased back to normal otherwise the economy is ****ed.
As good as video conferencing is for certain things nothing beats a face to face meeting. Business trips won't be at the same volume they always have been for a while but they won't disappear.
Agree on this but in these extraordinary times...? I used to do lots of business meetings all over Europe when I was working and really a lot of them could have been done by video link, except that that facility was not that readily available back the late 90's early 00's. The craziest ever trip was flying to Copenhagen, then a helicopter flight on to Malmo for a meeting that lasted less than one hour.
Interesting..
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...cience-uk-has/
I’m not sure it’s anything newQuote:
“They came to a different policy conclusion, but based really on quite similar science.
“I don’t agree with it. But scientifically, they’re not that far from scientists in any part of the world.”
Sweden’s rate of virus reproduction – the so-called ‘R’ value – is thought to be at one, meaning that, on average, every case will cause one other infection.
In the UK, it is thought to be between 0.75 and one, meaning the virus outbreak is retreating.
While pointing out that the Sweden’s mortality rate is not declining in a similar way to other European countries, Prof Ferguson said: “Nevertheless, it is interesting that adopting a policy which is short of a full lockdown – they have closed secondary schools and universities and there is a significant amount of social distancing, but it’s not a full lockdown – they have got quite a long way to the same effect. That is something we are looking at very closely.
“Lockdowns are very crude policies, and what we’d like to do is have much more targeted controlled transmission going forward, which doesn’t have the same economic impacts.”
Attachment 3868
is devolution good now?
HmmmmQuote:
Sweden
Confirmed 38,589
Recovered
4,971
Deaths
4,468
Denmark
Confirmed
11,734
+35
Recovered
10,489
Deaths
580
Finland
Confirmed
6,887
Recovered
5,500
Deaths
320
Norway
Confirmed
8,455
Recovered
7,727
Deaths
237
I bet those 4,500 dead and their families are glad the economy only contracted by 0.2% instead of 2%. What a relief that must be for them!
Schools in Wales to reopen on 29 June.
Dont know but the Norwegians are wondering
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...aign=DM1251860
So are Sweden too
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52903717
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ronavirus.html
Would you have sacrificed 4000 for 2% on the economy ?
On a completely different topic, I am seeing so many reports about "Tracers" complaining in the Media abut being paid to do nothing. There is another on the BBC Web Page this morning complaining of being paid to watch Netflix.
The solution for these people is simple. They can just quit. Hand in their notice then sit at home and watch Netflix for nothing. What's their problem?
There are more than enough people out there who would bite their hands off for the job, including all the student who normally supplement their grants by working in pubs, and including my boy who applied 2 weeks ago and hasn't even had acknowledgement of his application yet.
Yes, :hehe:. If they feel it is wrong they can, as I suggested, just resign, quit, walk out, stop doing it, desist, and then they can watch Netflix for nothing.
Then, as I said, the job can be given to people who are happy to be paid to sit and do nothing.
I don't even understand why the media report it except to stir the shite?
To report that the Govt's test and trace system isn't running as well as they have advertised... I'd imagine.
Your vitriol is being aimed at the media and the people whistleblowing about what's happening instead of the Govt. responsible for what's happening... That's funny :hehe:
Perhaps it is and there are no people for her to call? For me its just silly for anyone to complain for getting paid to do nothing. As I said, its too easy to resign and let someone else have the stress of doing nothing for money.
Whether the ssytem is working or not wasn't my point, the point was the woman complaining about getting paid for nothing. What really made me smile was that the article said she had only spoken on condition that she remained anonymous. i wonder why? Perhaps it was for fear of losing the great job she has? :hehe: